Netanyahu to Congress 2011 – full video

May 25, 2011

THIS is a man who can make a speech.

Eloquent and moving.

Israeli Prime Minister Addresses Congress

Willing to give up land for peace

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visited Capitol Hill today meeting with members of Congress and delivered an address to a Joint Meeting of Congress.

During his speech to Congress P.M. Netanyahu stated, “As President Obama said, borders will be different than 1967. Israel will not return to ‘indefensible’ borders.”  He added “It’s absolutely vital that a Palestinian state be demilitarized.”

He suggested that Israel is “willing” to advance the negotiations but must “make painful compromises” for peace.

House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), Netanyahu and Congressional Leaders also held a briefing with reporters following the joint meeting.

To members of AIPAC last night, Netanyahu said, “Israel cannot return to the indefensible 1967 line,” which President Obama said is the foundation for negotiation.

Updated: Tuesday at 4:52pm (ET)

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Netanyahu to Congress 2011, posted with vodpod

Obama administrations LGBT initiative to redefine marriage and family by executive fiat.

May 7, 2011

By what authority does this government have to impose these barbaric regulations on this country?

Barbaric, correct.  This is barbaric.

The freeks don’t WANT to conform to society.  The rest of US have to conform to them?

How is this democratic?  When did the few and obnoxious get to MAKE the rules for the rest of us?  When was it decided that it was not the MAJORITY RULE but the MINORITY decree?

Why have we let these clowns destroy the family and morality?

This is not FREEDOM.  This is the immoral few setting the agenda for the many, because the majority have been told to sit down and – SHUT UP!

HOW is the below Constitutional?

For children to be taught this type of thing in school is against the perversion laws that are still on the books in many states and cities.

Kevin Jennings agenda is coming to the fro:

Seven year olds are shown graphic sex cartoon – as part of their education curriculum

This man is still working as the “SAFE SCHOOL” CZAR.

These CZAR things need to be abolished and these people arrested for child abuse.

—Here are some more that come to mind:

orthwestern U. – From the IVY league to the lowest depths of perversion -Sex show professor defends live demo for students
Skins – British, now American soft porn – another reason to get your kids an iPhone
Planned Parenthood – Launches new “initiative” to teach PARENTS how to PERVERT their kids. Margaret Sanger began PP as a Eugenics program.
Helena, Montana – Kindergarten SEX education is right out of the Kevin Jennings play book – Education CZAR, appointed by Obama, and who was the founder the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network.
Girls – as young as 7 years old are target markets for the sex industry. Parents complicit in the perversion of their own daughters

Sex Change You Can Believe In! Obama is the Most Pro-Transgender President Ever

Posted on May 5, 2011 by Ben Johnson

by Ben Johnson

Your Tax dollars at work: HUD’s new ad campaign promoting transgender rights.

Call it sex-change you can believe in. This author reported Tuesday that Barack Obama had held the first-ever White House transgender conference last Friday. The People’s House conducted this proud meeting in such complete secrecy that we know the identity of only one attendee, Mara Keisling of the National Center for Transgender Equality (NCTE), a group lobbying for “a comprehensive civil rights bill that protects people from discrimination based on gender identity.” The measure, which would forbid private individuals from refusing to do business with or rent a home to a cross-dresser, is but one of many extremist policies that earned NCTE a meeting with White House brass. The U.S. Civil Rights Commission is now planning to “hold its first-ever hearing to specifically address the civil rights of LGBT people.” Despite these “firsts,” the Obama administration has already advanced transgender interest groups through a series of executive fiats. If you don’t believe me, believe The Huffington Post. It remarked that a recent housing proposal “marks the latest in a string of Obama administration attempts to enhance gay rights through federal regulation.” Some of the administration’s actions literally redefine the government’s definition of the family, stifle any opposition to gender confusion, and encourage schoolchildren to think of transgender practices as normal and mainstream (or else).

The First Transgender Appointee?

Last January, Obama named Amanda Simpson the Senior Technical Advisor to the Commerce Department. Simpson, who served as a test pilot and longtime employee of Raytheon before becoming a “woman,” sits on NCTE’s board of directors. The move was thought to be the first-ever transgender presidential appointment.

During his budget showdown with John Boehner, Obama (and Boehner) managed to see thatLGBT programs escaped deep budget cuts. Aside from these two matters, Obama has chosen to act through federal regulation, having government agencies write new rules without sullying his own hands. His administration has proven indefatigable in pursuing transgender concerns.

Thoughtcrime, Obama-Style

Last Thursday, Labor Secretary Hilda Solis (an Open Borders advocate) issued the department’s new harassment policy, which applies not only to the department but to all its “contractors at every level.” It bans any “unwelcome conduct, verbal or physical, based on race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy and gender identity), national origin, age, disability, genetic information, parental status, or sexual orientation.” This includes “making jokes or remarks that are offensive,” with “offensive” defined by the offended. Any infraction will result in “corrective and disciplinary action, up to and including removal, against all persons who have been found to have engaged in that conduct.” Upon hearing of this, theTransgender Law Center thanked Solis and Obama.

Solis has been on the frontlines of advancing LGBT interests. Last June, the Department of Labor redefined the terms “son and daughter” to include homosexual non-relatives.

Unfortunately, this is not the only way LGBT activists are coming after your sons and daughters.

Mainstreaming Cross-Dressers in Public Schools

NCTE has seconded “Safe Schools” Czar Kevin Jennings’ efforts to promote the LGBT agenda under the guise of fighting “bullying.” In March, Harper Jean Tobin, an attorney and expert on transsexuality who serves as NCTE policy counsel, attended the National Summit on Gender-Based Violence Among Youth, sponsored by the U.S. Department of Education, Justice, and Health and Human Services (HHS). The NCTE told officials to force schools to:

Harper Jean noted that at the March summit on “bullying,” (s)he had a nice “inspiring” têteà-tête with Russlyn Ali and Tom Perez, who head up civil rights enforcement at the Departments of Justice and Education.

Perez, the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, may have perjured himself before the U.S. Civil Rights Commission while testifying about the DoJ’s dismissal of the Black Panther voter intimidation case.

The LGBT activists and Obama administration officials know Americans differ sharply on the issues of homosexuality and cross-dressing, with traditional Christians rejecting both practicesin toto. They do not care. Their attitude seems to be, whatever parents believe, their children belong to The State eight hours a day and must adopt the Left’s amoral views during that time. Since children are especially impressionable and peer pressure is a defining factor for many children, The State is using the public schools to indoctrinate children into accepting lifestyles their parents find immoral.

Confirmation of Illegal Propaganda?

Tobin noted the “conference was used to announce the launch of no fewer than ten new anti-bullying campaigns and resources by participating organizations ranging from Facebook to the National PTA to, a federal website bringing together key resources, including resources on protecting LGBT youth.” This lends further confirmation that the Obama White House invites far-Left organizations to government events, then asks them to shill for its programs – a fact confirmed by left-wing activist Sally Kohn, who attended a series of outreach programs run by the White House’s Office of Public Engagement (OPE) headed by Valerie Jarrett. (Coincidentally, the NCTE’s blog has an entry shilling for ObamaCare, although the post has no specific content about transgender people.) Congressman Darrell Issa has demonstratedthis constitutes illegal covert propaganda.

Apparently, the propaganda runs both ways.

Federal Propaganda Campaign

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) celebrated April, “fair housing month,” by launching a year-long, $41 million campaign to fight “discrimination.” Its “Live Free” ad campaign singles out transgender people as an especially victimized class. (The campaign also prints Spanish language posters encouraging “victims” to report housing discrimination against “persons of foreign descent.”)

HUD is, well, proud its subservience to LGBT concerns has caused transgender “gender discrimination” complaints to skyrocket by more than 1,500 percent in one year.

'Offensive': Mrs Bullivant withdrew her daughter from the school after the graphic cartoon was shown to a class of seven-year-olds

'Offensive': Mrs Bullivant withdrew her daughter from the school after the graphic cartoon was shown to a class of seven-year-olds

Redefining the Term “Family”

The housing department is similarly pleased with a new rule in the Federal Register that this author exposed in January, which would literally redefine the term “family” to include gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender couples.

HUD Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing John Trasviña recently revealed the rule is moving full-steam ahead. “HUD is finalizing a federal rule to ensure that HUD housing and programs are open to all, irrespective of marital status, gender identify, and sexual orientation,” he said.Metro Weekly, a D.C.-area LGBT publication, has noted how radical this stroke-of-the-pen is, reporting the proposed rule would “expand the reach of sexual orientation and gender identity protections without changing that law because, as [HUD Secretary Shaun] Donovan said in January, the ‘[Federal Housing Administration] represents one-third of all mortgages in this country.’”

The covers 4.4 million HUD-financed housing units that accept funds from such programs as section 8 housing, public housing, Federal Housing Administration (FHA) programs, Community Development Block Grants, and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA). Ironically, Section 8 vouchers are often distributed through local churches, which will now be bound by this rule that violates its most sacred teachings about human sexuality.

Where it cannot pass or make laws, the Obama administration will simply pretend they exist. In July 2010, HUD announced it would enforce the Fair Housing Act as though it included sexual orientation and transgendered people – which it does not – arguing that discriminating against a man dressed as a woman could be construed as prejudice against women.

The Obama administration disregards the rule of law at will, now ignoring laws it wishes not to enforce (DOMA, voter intimidation against whites, illegal immigration laws), now drafting executive orders or regulations to make law from thin air, and sometimes twisting existing laws to apply to situations they clearly does not cover.

Rule by Executive Decree

Not surprisingly, transgender organizations are among those encouraging Obama to rule by executive orderThe Washington Blade reported sexual activists “have been pressing Obama to issue an executive order that would bar the federal government from contracting with companies that don’t have non-discrimination policies based on sexual orientation and gender identity for their workforce. Such a directive has been seen as an interim alternative while Republicans remain in control of the U.S. House to passing the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would bar job bias against LGBT people.” This is precisely what Hilda Solis implemented, albeit through federal regulation rather than an executive order. The impact is the same: a revolutionary cultural policy most Americans viscerally reject foisted upon them by liberal government decree. This disregard for the will of the people, this use of force to impose immorality from above, is the essence of modern liberalism.

Big Government and Immorality are Life-Partners

Few people believed Barack Obama’s protests when he insisted he did not want to own a car company. In fact, big government liberals want to own, control, or subsidize as much of the country as possible. The more the nation is dependent upon government, the more the liberals who control government can enforce their will. HUD pays the rent on 4.4 million housing units; now, with the stroke of a pen, the owners must open their doors to those they may consider perverts and sexual deviates.

First, liberals expand the reach of government. Second, they broaden the ability of the president to pass laws independent of Congress. Finally, they use this power to overturn traditional values as far as lies within their power.

Americans must combat this by rejecting government funds and returning to self-reliance, reviving traditional morality, and reducing the size and scope of government. Only when government is deprived of such power and purview can those who find such practices abhorrent rest assured they will not be forced to approve of them in their workplace, their schools, or their homes.

House approves cuts that adjust for Obama’s spending spree – Democrats call THAT DRACONIAN? Brats!

February 19, 2011

Keeping spending where it’s at is what the Democrats call a cut?

Thats the same thing as saying “honey, I know I’ve gained 50 lbs in 6 months, but I promise I won’t eat any MORE than what I eat today.  Pass the chips and soda, will you, please?— OH and do help yourself to the cheesecake over there, seeing as how I’m not going to pile it ON today. ”





House approves dramatic cuts in federal spending in 235-189 vote


Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, February 19, 2011; 5:48 AM


In a rare early morning weekend vote, the House approved an aggressive plan Saturday to eliminate dozens of federal programs and offices while slashing agency budgets by as much as 40 percent, drawing out more than $60 billion in deficit savings.





Setting up a showdown early next month with President Obama and Senate Democrats, House Republicans pushed the legislation through after a marathon debate capped off by an all-night session Friday that spilled into Saturday morning. During the bleary-eyed final roll call at 4:35 a.m., 235 Republicans were joined by no Democrats in support of dramatic spending reductions that they said were needed to address a soaring annual deficit of $1.6 trillion; 189 Democrats — as well as three Republicans — opposed it, accusing Republicans of writing the bill with a “double meat ax.”

The three Republicans voting against the measure wereReps. Jeff Flake (Ariz.), Walter Jones (N.C.) and John Campbell (Calif.).

For Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio), it marked an early political victory as his newly empowered GOP troops lived up to a 2010 campaign pledge to trim spending levels to those before the 2008 financial crisis caused an unprecedented level of government spending and intervention into the private economy.

“It’s democracy in action,” Boehner said in an impromptu, triumphal press conference off the House floor just past 9 p.m. Friday.

Yet Boehner’s victory could prove ephemeral as he faces staunch opposition from Obama, who vowed to veto the bill, and Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.), who declared it “draconian.”

The Senate is expected to take up its version of the spending measure the first week of March, just before a March 4 deadline for when the current funding resolution expires. With Democrats pushing to keep spending at 2010 levels for the remainder of this year, the two sides begin a grueling negotiation process more than $61 billion apart.

That gulf grew further Friday when Republicansapproved a series of measures that would provide narrow savings but impose sharp policy prescriptions, including the abolition of any federal funding going to Planned Parenthood and the restriction of any funds going toward the implementation of Obama’s health-care law.

The threat of a government shutdown looms if the sides cannot agree on funding levels by then, and they are already jockeying over how to draft a very short-term spending bill to keep the government open in March while the broader talks continue for the rest of fiscal year 2011, which ends Sept. 30. This debate is the first of several showdowns between the resurgent House Republicans and the Democratically-controlled Senate, including a pending dispute later this spring over Obama’s wish to raise the federal debt limit above the current ceiling of $14.3 trillion as Republicans demandbudgetary reforms that would restrain government spending.

“It’s going to be fascinating here over the next few weeks and months as we work our way through this. But these are going to be the most important two, three, four months that we have seen in this town in decades,” Boehner said. “It’s all one fight.”



Democrats accused Boehner of caving in to the demands from his conservative flank, which opposed an initial spending-cut package that was roughly half the size of the final draft. “They’re now driven by an arbitrary number picked out of the air because it sounded good,” House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said of campaign pledge, which is $100 billion lower than Obama’s proposed 2011 budget that was never enacted. Compared to 2010 levels, the spending cuts represent more than $61 billion in real savings, what would be the largest rescission of federal funds since the conclusion of World War II.

“A lot of them don’t know the ramifications in their own communities of what they’re doing,” Hoyer said in an interview.

If enacted as is, the GOP plan would eliminate numerous programs, including the Corporation for National Service, which runs the Americorps program; it would terminate federal funding of theCorporation for Public Broadcasting. It would cut $600 million from border security and immigration programs. It would eliminate nearly $80 million for the District and slash funding for the cleanup of Chesapeake Bay.


Obama’s own staff were targeted for more than $120 million in reductions from last year, including the elimination of funds for high-level advisers who serve as “czars” for policy areas such as climate change and executive compensation for corporations that received federal bailout funds.

Democrats tried to impart political pressure on Republicans for cutting so deeply into the federal government, particularly the 87 GOP freshmen who vaulted Boehner into the speaker’s chair with their November victories. On Friday, before the final vote, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee accused Rep. Nan Hayworth (R-N.Y.) of abandoning her local economy because the Republican plan would eliminate an Energy Department loan guarantee program that could impede a biomass project employing 80 people in her district north of Manhattan. “Hayworth ran on the promise of job creation, but in one of her first acts in Congress she is pushing a budget that will put some of her constituents out of work,” the DCCC said.

It was to no avail. Hayworth voted for the broad spending cuts.

Indeed, the freshman class has emerged as a critical bloc of votes that could prove decisive on the final negotiations over the spending bill, the debt limit vote later in the spring and many other key issues. Roughly half have never held public office before, so leadership does not yet know how the newcomers will react if Boehner and other congressional Republican leaders negotiated a compromise that does not cut as much spending as the House just approved.

Asked where the spending legislation was headed next, Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), a 12-year veteran, shook his head in wonderment and said the freshmen could hold the key. “I have no idea. Nobody really knows where this is going from here,” said Simpson, who helped craft the $61 billion in cuts as a member of the Appropriations Committee.

Boehner reveled Friday night in both the impending victory and the unusually open process that stretched through most of the week, allowing hundreds of amendments to be proposed and nearly 150 of them to receive votes. He took a victory lap through the lobby off the chamber floor and engaged reporters in an unplanned 25-minute question-and-answer session, contending the wide-open process produced a “real debate” that stood in stark contrast to “watching 20 years of leaders tighten down the process, tighten down the process, tighten down the process.”

“I’m proud of this vote,” he said.






Nancy Pelosi – Obama Healthcare would still be necessary even if all was well with it. Is she HOPING for the violence she has voiced?

January 4, 2011


Is this Nacy’s way of asking FOR violence against the “conservatives?”

I wonder..!?

This communist piggy is not above that.





Vodpod videos no longer available.


TEXAS – San Antonio – Congressman Lamar Smith, New House Judiciary Chairman, Prepares to Investigations on Obama’s Impeachment.

November 6, 2010


San Antonio Congressman taking a stand on Justice.

John Carter, representing Austin,  should get on this band wagon.

I’ll be sending him a gentle reminder.

The House Judiciary Committee Ranking Republican Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, center, accompanied by Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa,left, and Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn. , fields questions during news conference on Capitol Hill, in Washington, Tuesday, Aug. 10, 2010, announcing the introduction of a resolution condemning the Proposition 8 decision in California on same-sex marriage.



New House Judiciary Chairman to Obama: Prepare for Investigations:


Veteran Congressman will head influential House Judiciary Committee
By Jim Forsyth
Thursday, November 4, 2010




The San Antonio Congressman who is in line to become chairman of the powerful House Judiciary Committee is promising ‘a number of investigations and oversight committee actions’ which he vows will ‘hold the administration accountable,’ 1200 WOAI news reports.

Veteran Republican Lamar Smith, a Yale graduate and social conservative who grew up in the brush country of south Texas which is now transit point for illegal immigrants and drugs, said in a news conference that a number of issues will come into the sights of his committee when he takes the chairmanship in January, from cracking down on child pornography to taking the Obama Administration to task for failing to do enough to protect the southern border.

Smith says it is his Constitutional duty.

“Part of that checks and balances is in fact holding the administration accountable, is in fact insisting on more transparency, is insisting on more honesty, and getting the facts,” Smith said.  “Right now, because of the one party monopoly, the Administration has been able to dodge any kind of supervision, any kind of oversight committee action, and they refuse to testify, and that is no longer acceptable.”

Smith, 63, says he says he has spoken to Speaker-designate John Boehner and has been told that he will move to the chairmanship of the committee.  He has been ranking Republican on the committee for four years, and also headed the House Ethics Committee during the previous Republican majority.

Smith repeatedly attacked what he called the ‘one party control’ which has allowed the Administration and majority Democrats to ramrod their position on key issues like health care and border security through Congress.

“Right now, we’ve had one party control all aspects of our government, and the result of that is that the American people have only gotten one side of a lot of issues,” he said.

One thing that Democrats openly expressed their concern about is the ability of Republicans like Smith, chairmen of key House committees, to use the Majority’s subpoena power to compel testimony on a whole host of issues.  Smith says their concerns were justified.

“There are going to be a number of investigations or oversight committee actions, trying to get to the facts,” he promised.

Smith cited national security and the threat of terrorism will be a key area that the Judiciary Committee plans to take action quickly, and said border security, an issue always close to Smith’s heart, will also take top billing.

“We need to have better national security and border security.  We need to know who is coming across the border, why they are coming across illegally.  We need to reduce the huge amount of drug smuggling and immigrant smuggling.”

Smith said that reform of the 14th Amendment, which grants automatic citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants who are born in the U.S., is also an issue his committee may take up under his chairmanship.  The 14th Amendment is a hot button issue for conservatives who call for restricting immigration.

He said adding ‘meaningful’ lawsuit reform will also be a top priority.

“I think we are going to be able to reform and amend the health care bill,” he said.  “We are not going to be able to repeal it, because the president would veto any repeal.  But we can go back and make some changes and improvements.  We need to reduce health care costs, and we need medical liability reform, and make sure we can stop the number of frivolous lawsuits.”

Smith promised to ‘use subpoena power if necessary’ to ‘call on Administration officials to get to the truth and get to the facts.’


Obama believes Conservatives are the enemy calls them enemies

November 1, 2010

Conservatives are RACISTS, Sexists, Bigots, and whatever else Liberals can come up with.

One has to wonder what irked him so much about the HISPANICS?

Maybe it’s the fact that some HISPANICS are finally seeing the Democrats are not for THEM, but rather holding them down.  Just like the blacks and any other “minority.”   They want to be the answer to all’s ailments, but the answer is to follow the letter of the Democrats to the T, so if you can’t do that, then you are the ENEMY.  They say that, since they are the answer, then you should WANT to follow them and adhere to EVERYTHING that they want you to do and say, because it’s for your own good and don’t you WANT that which is GOOD.  The Democrats want this, not only for AMERICA, they want to bring this SUPERIOR understanding to the rest of the World.  They want the WORLD to be dominated with this philosophy.  They BELIEVE that this is the only RIGHT ideology.  They are the only answer, because they know what RIGHT.


Dissent is the ENEMY.

The AMERICAN people are once again rebelling against a central authority.  The heathen and unruly are pushing back.  The American people are themselves the enemy of themselves.  This is what the Democrats, who are no longer Democrats believe.  The Democrats are Communists.  The Democrats call themselves “Socialists and Globalists and Progressives,” but they are nothing more or less then the Communistic Dictators running as a group like an OLIGARCHY, soon to be a MONOPOLY.

The PEOPLE are the ENEMY.

Official presidential portrait of Barack Obama...

Image via Wikipedia

These policies are in direct opposition to the Constitution and there is a reason for that.  These policies establish Dictatorships and Tyranny’s.  The policies are circumventing the Constitution and are, therefore, the definition of TREASON

Nov 1, 7:51 PM EDT

Obama pulls back on ‘enemies’ remark to Latinos

Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) — A day before the pivotal midterm elections, President Barack Obama pulled back from remarks he made last month when he called on Latino voters to punish their “enemies” on Election Day. In an interview Monday with radio host Michael Baisden, Obama said he should have used the word “opponents” instead of enemies.

John Boehner

Image via Wikipedia

Republicans were quick to criticize the president’s remarks. House Minority Leader John Boehner was expected to use Obama’s words in an election eve speech in Ohio to paint the president as a staunch partisan.

“Sadly, we have a president who uses the word ‘enemy’ for fellow Americans, fellow citizens. He used it for people who disagree with his agenda of bigger government,” Boehner said, according to prepared remarks released in advance of his speech.

Obama’s original comments came during an interview with Eddie “Piolin” Sotelo, a Hispanic radio personality. Piolin questioned how Obama could ask Latinos for their vote when many don’t believe he’s worked hard to pass comprehensive immigration reform.

Obama responded: “If Latinos sit out the election instead of saying, ‘We’re gonna punish our enemies and we’re gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us,’ if they don’t see that kind of upsurge in voting in this election, then I think it’s gonna be harder.”

The president said Monday that the message he was trying to send was that voters need to support lawmakers who stand with them on the issue.

“Now the Republicans are saying that I’m calling them enemies,” Obama said. “What I’m saying is you’re an opponent of this particular provision, comprehensive immigration reform, which is something very different.”

With Republicans poised to score sweeping victories in Tuesday’s election, Obama has been imploring the Democratic base to vote in hopes of turning some close races in his party’s favor.

Though Obama had no publicly announced campaign events on his schedule Monday and Tuesday, the president has been doing radio interviews targeting young people, African-Americans and voters in key states. He was also to hold a conference call Monday night with campaign volunteers in Florida, New Hampshire, New Mexico and Hawaii.


MY comment at the site:

He’s the enemy.  The enemy of the AMERICAN people.  This phony POTUS is practicing TREASON.  He’s circumventing the Constitution by implementing policies or appointing people that are the antithesis to the American LAW.  This is necessary for the Democrats to be able to implement Global LAW and REPLACE the Constitution and the MUSLIMS want it to be THEIR LAW that is put in place.  The Democrats are narcissistic and think that they can control the Muslims and this is why they have enlisted the “kulak” (fists) of ISLAM to help them in the SUBMISSION of the European Americans.  Once the American peoples submission is at hand, the Democrats (in name only) will turn on the MUSLIMS, because their objective is GLOBALISM – AKA Communism

%d bloggers like this: