Obama should not be president – Israel is thrown under the bus by POTUS, AND the US is also case asunder by proxyMay 21, 2011
Vodpod videos no longer available.
Jonathan Schanzer of the Jewish Policy Institute addressed the Center for Security Policy’s National Security Group on Capitol Hill. He is the author of Hamas vs. Fatah.
Obama’s Abandonment of America
Reprinted from carolineglick.com.
I was out sick yesterday so I was unable to write today’s column for theJerusalem Post. I did manage to watch President Obama’s speech on the Middle East yesterday evening. And I didn’t want to wait until next week to discuss it. After all, who knows what he’ll do by Tuesday?
Before we get into what the speech means for Israel, it is important to consider what it means for America.
Quite simply, Obama’s speech represents the effective renunciation of the US’s right to have and to pursue national interests. Consequently, his speech imperils the real interests that the US has in the region – first and foremost, the US’s interest in securing its national security.
Obama’s renunciation of the US national interests unfolded as follows:
First, Obama mentioned a number of core US interests in the region. In his view these are: “Countering terrorism and stopping the spread of nuclear weapons; securing the free flow of commerce, and safe-guarding the security of the region; standing up for Israel’s security and pursuing Arab-Israeli peace.”
Then he said, “Yet we must acknowledge that a strategy based solely upon the narrow pursuit of these interests will not fill an empty stomach or allow someone to speak their mind.”
While this is true enough, Obama went on to say that the Arabs have good reason to hate the US and that it is up to the US to put its national interests aside in the interest of making them like America. As he put it, “a failure to change our approach threatens a deepening spiral of division between the United States and Muslim communities.”
And you know what that means. If the US doesn’t end the “spiral of division,” (sounds sort of like “spiral of violence” doesn’t it?), then the Muslims will come after America. So the US better straighten up and fly right.
And how does it do that? Well, by courting the Muslim Brotherhood which spawned Al Qaeda, Hamas, Jamma Islamiya and a number of other terror groups and is allies with Hezbollah.
How do we know this is Obama’s plan? Because right after he said that the US needs to end the “spiral of division,” he recalled his speech in Egypt in June 2009 when he spoke at the Brotherhood controlled Al Azhar University and made sure that Brotherhood members were in the audience in a direct diplomatic assault on US ally Hosni Mubarak.
And of course, intimations of Obama’s plan to woo and appease the jihadists appear throughout the speech. For instance:
“There will be times when our short term interests do not align perfectly with our long term vision of the region.”
So US short term interests, like for instance preventing terrorist attacks against itself or its interests, will have to be sacrificed for the greater good of bringing the Muslim Brotherhood to power in democratic elections.
And he also said that the US will “support the governments that will be elected later this year” in Egypt and Tunisia. But why would the US support governments controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood? They are poised to control the elected government in Egypt and are the ticket to beat in Tunisia as well.
Then there is the way Obama abandoned US allies Yemen and Bahrain in order to show the US’s lack of hypocrisy. As he presented it, the US will not demand from its enemies Syria and Iran that which it doesn’t demand from its friends.
While this sounds fair, it is anything but fair. The fact is that if you don’t distinguish between your allies and your enemies then you betray your allies and side with your enemies. Bahrain and Yemen need US support to survive. Iran and Syria do not. So when he removes US support from the former, his action redounds to the direct benefit of the latter.
Beyond his abandonment of Bahrain and Yemen, in claiming that the US mustn’t distinguish between its allies and its foes, Obama made clear that he has renounced the US’s right to have and pursue national interests. If you can’t favor your allies against your enemies then you cannot defend your national interests. And if you cannot defend your national interests then you renounce your right to have them.
As for Iran, in his speech, Obama effectively abandoned the pursuit of the US’s core interest of preventing nuclear proliferation. All he had to say about Iran’s openly genocidal nuclear program is, “Our opposition to Iran’s intolerance – as well as its illicit nuclear program, and its sponsorship of terror – is well known.”
Well so is my opposition to all of that, and so is yours. But unlike us, Obama is supposed to do something about it. And by putting the gravest threat the US presently faces from the Middle East in the passive voice, he made clear that actually, the US isn’t going to do anything about it.
May 11, 2011
Palestinian State in September? Hamas Says No Way
Gaza rulers say September most likely too soon to declare Palestinian independence, as too many questions pertaining to state’s viability remain unanswered
Senior Hamas official Mahmoud al-Zahar said Wednesday that the Islamist movement was somewhat skeptical as to the viability of Fatah’s September-bound bid for statehood.
Speaking with the Palestinian Ma’an News Agency, al-Zahar said that “all the talk of a Palestinian state is… an attempt to pacify us.”
He further wondered as to the nature of the Palestinian state, should it be declared in several months’ time: “Where is the land for this state? Are those living in the West Bank and Gaza to be its citizens? What will be the fate of the five million Palestinians in the diaspora? Are we to give up the right of return?”
He also said that anyone who thinks that a Palestinian state would be accepted by the international community without it recognizing Israel first, “does not understand the (political) landscape.”
Hamas, he said, is willing to accept a Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders, but will maintain its refusal to recognize Israel, since a formal recognition of Israel would “cancel the right of the next generations to liberate the lands.”
Read more at YNet.
Palestinians never miss an opportunity.
In short, every American who is concerned about the security of the United States should be livid. The US President just abandoned his responsibility to defend the country and its interests in the interest of coddling the US’s worst enemies.
AS FOR ISRAEL, in a way, Obama did Israel a favor by giving this speech. By abandoning even a semblance of friendliness, he has told us that we have nothing whatsoever to gain by trying to make him like us. Obama didn’t even say that he would oppose the Palestinians’ plan to get the UN Security Council to pass a resolution in support for Palestinian independence. All he said was that it is a dumb idea.
Obama sided with Hamas against Israel by acting as though its partnership with Fatah is just a little problem that has to be sorted out to reassure the paranoid Jews. Or as he put it, “the recent announcement of an agreement between Fatah and Hamas raises profound and legitimate questions for Israel.”
Hamas is a jihadist movement dedicated to the annihilation of the Jewish people, and the establishment of a global caliphate. It’s in their charter. And all Obama said of the movement that has now taken over the Palestinian Authority was, “Palestinian leaders will not achieve peace or prosperity if Hamas insists on a path of terror and rejection.”
Irrelevant and untrue.
It is irrelevant because obviously the Palestinians don’t want peace. That’s why they just formed a government dedicated to Israel’s destruction.
As for being untrue, Obama’s speech makes clear that they have no reason to fear a loss of prosperity. After all, by failing to mention that US law bars the US government from funding an entity which includes Hamas, he made clear that the US will continue to bankroll the Hamas-controlled Palestinian Authority. So too, the EU will continue to join the US in giving them billions for bombs and patronage jobs. The Palestinians have nothing to worry about. They will continue to be rewarded regardless of what they do.
Then of course there are all the hostile, hateful details of the speech:
He said Israel has to concede its right to defensible borders as a precondition for negotiations;
He didn’t say he opposes the Palestinian demand for open immigration of millions of foreign Arabs into Israel;
He again ignored Bush’s 2004 letter to Sharon opposing a return to the 1949 armistice lines, supporting the large settlements, defensible borders and opposing mass Arab immigration into Israel;
He said he was leaving Jerusalem out but actually brought it in by calling for an Israeli retreat to the 1949 lines;
He called for Israel to be cut in two when he called for the Palestinians state to be contiguous;
He called for Israel to withdraw from the Jordan Valley – without which it is powerless against invasion – by saying that the Palestinian State will have an international border with Jordan.
Conceptually and substantively, Obama abandoned the US alliance with Israel. The rest of his words – security arrangements, demilitarized Palestinian state and the rest of it – were nothing more than filler to please empty-headed liberal Jews in America so they can feel comfortable signing checks for him again.
Indeed, even his seemingly pro-Israel call for security arrangements in a final peace deal involved sticking it to Israel. Obama said, “The full and phased withdrawal of Israeli military forces should be coordinated with the assumption of Palestinian security responsibility in a sovereign, non-militarized state.”
What does that mean “with the assumption of Palestinian security responsibility?”
It means we have to assume everything will be terrific.
All of this means is that if Prime Minister Netanyahu was planning to be nice to Obama, and pretend that everything is terrific with the administration, he should just forget about it. He needn’t attack Obama. Let the Republicans do that.
But both in his speech to AIPAC and his address to Congress, he should very forthrightly tell the truth about the nature of the populist movements in the Middle East, the danger of a nuclear Iran, the Palestinians’ commitment to Israel’s destruction; the lie of the so-called peace process; the importance of standing by allies; and the critical importance of a strong Israel to US national security.
He has nothing to gain and everything to lose by playing by the rules that Obama is trying to set for him.
2 Comments | African countries, Amero - Islamic war, assembly, assembly, At the white house, Burqa / Niqab, Catholicism, communist / socialist / liberal / democrat, corruption, economy, Egypt, Fascist, flotilla, gathering, government sensorship, Iran, Iraq, Islamification, ISRAEL, jordan, Judaism, Kenya, Kosovo, Lebanon, Libel, Libya, Main Stream Media, Marxist, Marxist-Leninist, meeting, Middle East countries, NEW WORLD ORDER, Obama - the Muslim, Palestine, Political corectness, political correctness, Politically Correct, Progressive, propaganda, propaganda, protests, Religion, Saudi Arabia, Sedition, Serbia, Social media, socialist, speaking against ISLAM or Muslims or Mohammed, Stalin, Syria, Taqiyah lie, taqiyya, takiyah, takiyya, takiya, Terrorist, terrorist or pirate, Town Hall, townhall, Treason, UN general assembly, unconstitutional government policy, useful idiots, Weapons, welfare, Women and Children used as FODDER by MUSLIMS | Tagged: Caroline Glick, Iran, middle east, Mississippi River, Muslim, muslim brotherhood, President Obama, United States | Permalink
Posted by txlady706
No only is the uprising in the ME NOT Democratic, it’s a sort of CIVIL WAR.
I say civil war, because if one looks at the entire area as PERSIA and Muslim, then the area and issue becomes VERY clear.
Iran is not the head. There is no HEAD. The HEAD is ISLAM.
The wars are over control of the region. The issue is who will be the leader of the coming LARGER fight. Who wins here is who will take the baton of ISLAM to carry it forward in to the NEW MILLENNIAL.
2011 is 1432 H in Islam.
Bahrain Sees Hezbollah Plot in Protest
In Report to U.N., Government Says Lebanese Militant Group Has Been Working to Overthrow Ruling Khalifa Family
by Jay Solomon
Bahrain has accused the Iranian-backed militia Hezbollah with seeking to overthrow the island-state’s ruling family, in a report to the United Nations, escalating the growing cold war between Sunni Arab states and Shiite-dominated Iran.
The confidential report, sent to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon last week, alleges that Hezbollah has been training Bahraini opposition figures at camps in Lebanon and Iran. Bahrain’s government also accuses Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and other senior members of the Islamist Lebanese organization of directly plotting with Bahrain’s largely Shiite opposition on how to challenge the ruling Khalifa family.
Iran, Hezbollah and Bahrain’s opposition movement deny …
Below is a good understanding of the ME. Look at each countries -“Constitution and the Rule of Law .” This will give a good feel for each.
Hizballah to pull its heavy missiles from Syrian safekeeping
DEBKAfile Exclusive Report May 1, 2011, 9:30 PM (GMT+02:00)
The Lebanese Shiite Hizballah has obviously decided the Assad regime is sinking.DEBKAfile’s military sources report the organization is preparing to pull its heavy, long-range weapons out of storage in Syrian military facilities – no longer sure they are safe there – and risk transporting them to Lebanon.
Last year, Syrian President Bashar Assad agreed to store Hizballah’s incoming Iran-made Fatah-110 surface missiles and its Syrian equivalent the M-600 and the mobile SA-8 (Gecko) anti-air battery which holds 18 warheads with a maximum range of 12 kilometers. Tehran paid for the upkeep of the Hizballah hardware on Syrian side of the border after Israel threatened to bomb these potential game-changers if they crossed over.
Deployed at Hizballah bases in Lebanon, the Fatah-110 and M-600 would place almost every corner of Israel within range of bombardment, while the SA-8 would seriously restrict Israeli Air Force operations over southern Lebanon and Galilee.
However, as the uprising against Assad rolls ever closer to Damascus, Hizballah see a very real threat of it infecting the Syrian army and has decided that now might be its last chance to get hold of the core arsenal it has standing by for war with Israel before events get out of hand in Syria.
Hizballah’s headquarters in Dahya, Beirut, became alarmed when they heard about strong resentment building up in the Syrian 11th Division over the Assad crackdown against the dissidents – among officers as well as other ranks.
The 11th Division, which is camped outside Aleppo, is the best trained and organized of all Syrian army units, equipped as its strategic reserve with the most advanced weaponry. If the unrest has reached this elite unit, Hizballah reckons there is no time to losing for pulling its missiles out of Syrian military safekeeping.
Meanwhile, top Hizballah and Iranian offices in Tehran are working on the best way to transport the missiles into Lebanon without exposing them to Israeli attack, DEBKAfile’s Iranian sources report. Some of them calculate that Israel would not venture to strike them while still on Syrian soil because it would lay itself open to interfering, or even getting in the way of, the revolt against President Assad and playing into his hands.
A security emergency might well take the wind out of protest movement’s sails.
But already, Tehran’s Lebanese surrogate is beginning to distance itself from Bashar Assad, its longtime strategic partner and arms supplier, having decided he has his back to the wall. April 28, the Hizballah-controlled Lebanese Al Akhbar newspaper started criticizing the Assad regime on its op-ed pages.
Leave a Comment » | afghanistan, African countries, Airforce, Amero - Islamic war, Aristocracy, Army, ATF, Burqa / Niqab, communist, communist / socialist / liberal / democrat, corruption, democrat, Dereliction of Duty, Egypt, ELITE, environmentalists, Fascist, Globalists, green, green peace, Greenies, illegals, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Islamification, Islamists, ISRAEL, jordan, Kenya, Kosovo, Kuwait, Lebanon, Lenanon, Libel, Liberal, Libya, Main Stream Media, Mao and Che Guevara, Maoist, Marxist, Marxist-Leninist, Middle East countries, Military, Napolitano, Navy, NEW WORLD ORDER, nuclear, Obama - the Muslim, Pakistan, Palestine, Pol Pot, Political corectness, political correctness, Politically Correct, Progressive, propaganda, propaganda, Republican, RINO, ROTC, Saudi Arabia, Sedition, Serbia, sharia, Social media, socialist, Somalia, Syria, Terrorist, terrorist or pirate, Turkey, Tyranny, useful idiots, voter fraud, Weapons, welfare, Women and Children used as FODDER by MUSLIMS | Tagged: Bahrain, Ban Ki-moon, Bashar al-Assad, Hassan Nasrallah, hezbollah, Iran, lebanon, Shia Islam, Sunni Islam, syria, United Nations | Permalink
Posted by txlady706
Article 1 section 9 of the US Constitution –
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present,Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State.
Obama is illegally sitting as head of the UN (not US– UN) Security Council.
This is directly relevant to the article :
Under the UN Charter, the functions and powers of the Security Council are:
* to maintain international peace and security in accordance with the principles and purposes of the United Nations;
* to investigate any dispute or situation which might lead to international friction;
* to recommend methods of adjusting such disputes or the terms of settlement;
* to formulate plans for the establishment of a system to regulate armaments;
* to determine the existence of a threat to the peace or act of aggression and to recommend what action should be taken;
* to call on Members to apply economic sanctions and other measures not involving the use of force to prevent or stop aggression;
* to take military action against an aggressor;
* to recommend the admission of new Members;
* to exercise the trusteeship functions of the United Nations in “strategic areas”;
* to recommend to the General Assembly the appointment of the Secretary-General and, together with the Assembly, to elect the Judges of the International Court of Justice.
One might say that the UN is not a STATE.
Well, then the US can be viewed similarly as the UN, because we are a bunch of states that come together under the Constitution. The UN has a similar charter that the Nations that are part of it also adhere to. This however, is a title that is ABSOLUTELY illegal for a US PRESIDENT TO HOLD.
April 13, 2011
The New Axis of Jihad
2 Comments | afghanistan, Al Sharpton, Amero - Islamic war, Article 9 of the US CONSTITUTION - nobility clause, ASIA, assembly, Black, black leader, Burqa / Niqab, China, China, communist, communist / socialist / liberal / democrat, corruption, CZARS, democrat, Dereliction of Duty, Donation, Education- or lack there of, Egypt, ELITE, environmentalists, Fascist, flotilla, gathering, government sensorship, green, Iran, Iraq, Islamification, Islamists, Jesse Jackson, Lebanon, Libel, Liberal, Libya, Main Stream Media, Marxist, Mental Plantations, Middle East countries, Military, NAACP, NEW WORLD ORDER, nuclear, Obama - the Muslim, OBAMA APPOINTMENTS, Palestine, Political corectness, political correctness, Politically Correct, Progressive, propaganda, propaganda, protests, Religion, Republican, Robert Gibbs, Rupert Murdoch, Saudi Arabia, second amendment, SECURITY ADVISOR, Sedition, sharia, Social media, socialist, Somalia, speaking against ISLAM or Muslims or Mohammed, Taqiyah lie, taqiyya, takiyah, takiyya, takiya, Terrorist, terrorist or pirate, Treason, Tyranny, UN general assembly, useful idiots, Weapons | Tagged: Al-Qaeda, Barack Obama, Iran, Judges of the International Court of Justice, Libya, middle east, New York Times, Saddam Hussein, United States, Warfare and Conflict | Permalink
Posted by txlady706
Unfortunately, just like MAD, that ONLY works for an enemy that is ideologically similar.
Islamic countries are not. Muhammad saw to that. And OBAMA put himself on the UN security council to obtain the power of the post. No matter that it’s UNCONSTITUTIONAL. (see Article 9) Islam is not even a religion. Anything that is 1/5th or less of anything can’t be classified as any ONE thing. Islam is Shariah Law, culture, ideology, politics and Maybe, if there is room, religion.
If one reads the Q’RAN, Hadith, and the Sunna’s, one begins to understand the core of it is born of a boy, angered by his orphanhood and has to survive under harsh and hostile circumstances. He finds a niche. And it’s violence. Be MORE violent then your enemy and you will win. Then, later, after much achieved success by using these lessons learned, he hears of Judaism and Christianity. He is illiterate. He has other people translate – directionless translations and broken at that, this is how he begins to perceive other religions. He deems them inferior. He decides to implement TACTICS of the major religions. These were not placed for the betterment of society and the procreation of LIFE. NO. These were implemented as TOOLS to seduce into Islam, so that those who succumb, MUST SUBMIT to ONLY Islam and through that submission the direction is not LIFE, but CONQUEST in in lieu of life. This is WHY martyrdom is so revered in Islam. It is ABOVE life.
How sad that our politician don’t see HOW incompatible this false religion is to the WEST.
It’s sad that they choose to make deals with the devil. The devil that they don’t even understand. How vain it is of them to think that they can out wit something they don’t even TRY to understand. When my daughter says that she doesn’t understand, but does nothing to try to understand, then I recognize her as being lazy. THIS is the REASON why westerners are UNDERSTOOD by Muslims to be lazy. They have had their elites attend our schools and limbed in our culture in order to infiltrate us. They have been methodical and specific. While our “leaders” have been scratching their asses playing kids games.
The U.S. Arms Its Islamic Enemies–Again
Evidence grows with each passing week that in Libya the U.S. government and its allies are providing air cover and arms directly to its avowed enemies–including thugs from al Qaeda, Muslim Brotherhood, and Taliban–those who’ve devoted the past decade to slaughtering American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. Worse, top U.S. and U.K. officials now acknowledge this and condone it.
At this week’s London conference on the Libyan war, while U.S. Secretary of State Clinton said the tyrant Gadhafi must go, U.K. Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg saidthat if Gadhafi were to go, Libya could become a hard-line Islamist state, but the “gamble” was worth it. Above all, both stressed, Western allies must convey “humility” and forswear any desire to “impose” its preferred type of law-abiding government in Libya or anywhere else in the region.
In Foreign Policy magazine two military and terrorism experts describehow “Libya contributed hundreds of the fiercest foreign fighters to Iraq’s al Qaeda-led insurgency” and ask “Should Washington be worried that it’s now backing these guys against Qaddafi?” In fact, Washington foreign policymakers are more likely to be pleased than worried. For details, see only the vicious theories of Samantha Power, Obama’s national security adviser, who calls herself a “humanitarian hawk”–much like George W. Bush styled himself a “compassionate conservative” while proclaiming Islam to be a “good and peaceful religion.” Libya is only the latest in a long-term effort by foreign policymakers to encourage, fight for and sponsor Islamic regimes.
This craven and self-sacrificing policy is deadly, yet embraced by Democrats and Republicans alike in the U.S., albeit obscured by quibbles over the timing and tactics of Obama’s invasion. Both believe the world must be made “safe for democracy”–for mob rule and the almighty ballot–which means, in the Middle East: made safe for the rise and spread of Islamic rule. To “accomplish” this end the West is to “gamble” the lives and fortunes of its own citizens, while ensuring that secularism, the rule of law, individual rights and constitutionalism have no real chance in the Middle East, since that would entail “imperialistic colonizing”
Democrats and Republicans alike accept the myth that the “enemy of our enemy is my friend.” Even if the Christian Right occasionally admits to there being a real enemy, it finds a moral sanction in “turning the other cheek” to evils and threats, while the Relativist Left feels morally sanctified that the “lesser of two evils” isn’t really an evil at all, especially since there’s never any clear “black and white.” Meanwhile Islamic rebels are certain the U.S. and Israel are “evil”–Big Satan, Little Satan–and should be “wiped off the map.”
When cowardly, doubt-ridden disquietude meets irrational, brazen certitude the latter inevitably wins. The civilized West today is unjustifiably cowardly and guilt-ridden, while the Islamic radicals are certain, insane, evil, and dangerous; thus the former provides air cover, arms and moral sanction to the latter. The Islamic radicals specialize in rearing homicide-bombers, but it’s the West that rears the real suicide-bombers, for when the U.S. military bombs Libya–as it did Iraq and Afghanistan–it does so to clear a path for its sworn enemies.
Who exactly are the “rebels” and why are the U.S. and its allies so eager to help them? In Iran in early 1979 the Carter administration couldn’t care less about the philosophy or aims of the Ayatollah Khomeini, but only that the pro-Western Shah of Iran be deposed; by March a “referendum” established an Islamic republic; by April scores of prominent Iranians were executed; by December the ruling mullahs declared Khomeini to be absolute ruler for life. Ever since, Iran has been a major sponsor of world-wide terrorism.
In Afghanistan in the 1980s the Reagan administration and a CIA (then led by today’s Pentagon chief, Robert Gates) helped finance and train al Qaeda, the Taliban and Osama bin Laden in their fight against the invading Soviets (who withdrew in 1989). The U.S. also backed Iraq in its eight-year war against Iran, which failed, yet emboldened Saddam Hussein, and the U.S. fought him later. In the 1990s Afghanistan became a haven for terrorism, which led to the devastation of Sept. 11. In the decade since the U.S. has spent thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars ensuring “regime change” in Iraq and Afghanistan, which now have Islamic constitutions and are far closer in theocracy and practice to Iran than ever before.
Americans should realize that “the enemy of our enemy” is not our friend, but our enemy, and that America has many enemies, both at home and abroad. There can be no success in playing off one against the other.
Yet the same suicidal pattern is visible in Pakistan, Egypt and Libya, where military strongmen (and onetime U.S. allies) Musharraf, Mubarak and Gahdafi–not unlike Shah of Iran and Saddam Hussein in Iraq–have faced insurgencies emboldened by U.S. rhetoric and military aid, even though the “rebels” have showed every sign, yet again, of being devoted Islamic terrorists and enemies of America. Amid these “rebellions” few in Washington or the media have bothered to examine the actual make-up or aims of the rebels.
Rebellion is applauded for its own sake. Western cheerleaders claim anything is better than the status quo. Hope! Change! Democracy! The voice of the People is the voice of … Allah! The grim facts become clearer after the dust settles and new leaders and rules take irreversible hold–more fundamentally Islamic than before, closer to Iran than before, more anti-American than before–with the help of the U.S. government.
Thanks solely to the U.S., Iraq’s constitution ensures a “democratic, federal, representative, parliamentary republic” where “Islam is the state religion and a basic foundation for the country’s laws” and “no law may contradict the established provisions of Islam.” Is this why Americans must go to war in the Middle East? The official name of Afghanistan, where the U.S. has fought for a decade, like the failed Soviets, and Obama has boosted U.S. troops to 130,000, is” “the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan.” Is this why Americans must fight in the region?
Pakistan, with 170 million people (sixth largest in the world, and the second largest Muslim population after Indonesia) has nuclear weapons and is officially the “Islamic Republic of Pakistan.” It’s also part of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), a permanent delegation to the United Nations with 57 member states, all of which are philosophically anti-American and support U.N. missions to ensconce Islamic rebels in the governments of once-U.S. allies. Is this why we fight in the Middle East?
In Egypt this year the Obama administration helped unseat Mubarak, and it is now reported that the terror-sponsoring Muslim Brotherhood is taking over, re-writing the constitution, and preparing the ground for yet another state sponsor of terrorism, aimed directly at Israel. Essam el-Erian, the leader and spokesman, recently got 77% of voters to call for an Islamic state. “The Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamist group once banned by the state, is at the forefront, transformed into a tacit partner with the military government that many fear will thwart fundamental changes. . . . It is also clear that the young, educated secular activists who initially propelled the non-ideological revolution are no longer the driving political force.” In Libya “the rebel commander, Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, admits his fighters have al Qaeda links” and that he himself fought the U.S. in Afghanistan before being captured and released to fight another day, now with U.S. help.
Some Western cheerleaders pretend to be chagrined and surprised by all this, while others applaud it precisely because they are anti-Western and antisemitic at root and thus welcome any Middle East regime that’s more closely aligned with Iran’s mission to rule the world and destroy Israel and the U.S. There should be no surprise that this is what the Quran encourages and demands, but Americans should be asking: Why is this what U.S. leaders–from Carter to Bush to Obama–also seem to encourage and demand?
1 Comment | Amero - Islamic war, Article 9 of the US CONSTITUTION - nobility clause, communist, communist / socialist / liberal / democrat, corruption, democrat, ELITE, environmentalists, Fascist, Globalists, green, green peace, Greenies, Islamists, Liberal, Maoist, Marxist, Marxist-Leninist, Political corectness, political correctness, Politically Correct, Progressive, propaganda, propaganda, Religion, Republican, RINO, Sedition, sharia, sick, Social media, socialist, speaking against ISLAM or Muslims or Mohammed, Taqiyah lie, taqiyya, takiyah, takiyya, takiya, Terrorist, terrorist or pirate, Treason, Tyranny, unconstitutional government policy, useful idiots, voter fraud, Weapons | Tagged: afghanistan, Al-Qaeda, Foreign Policy, George W. Bush, Iran, Islam, Libya, middle east, osama bin laden, Saddam Hussein, Western World | Permalink
Posted by txlady706
Obama sits on the security council in the UN, so he could stop this.
This UNCONSTITUTIONAL post that he holds should quickly end his presidency. This is impeachable. How can he sit there and not do anything about this type of FINANCIAL game playing? Very easy. HE DOESN’T operate for the US and as a result, he will also not say anything about this AS The PRESIDENT of the US. He has other allegiances.
The mainstream media is VOID on this.
They have completely ignored this huge story and they will bury as quickly as they can.
This should be something to shed light on, but they are too afraid, because that would expose the fact that OBAMA sitting on the UN security council IS A VIOLATION of the CONSTITUTION — THE NOBILITY clause — Article 1 section 9
—No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State.
- Posted: Mon, Mar 28 2011. 5:01 PM IST
Govt to pay Iran for oil using Germany: report
Under pressure from the United States to break direct commercial links with the Islamic republic, India intends to place money for its Iranian oil imports in an account with the Bundesbank, the Handelsblatt business daily reported
Berlin: India is set to pay Iran for billions of dollars worth of oil imports by channeling funds to Tehran via the German central bank, a German newspaper report said Monday.
Under pressure from the United States to break direct commercial links with the Islamic republic, India intends to place money for its Iranian oil imports in an account with the Bundesbank, the Handelsblatt business daily reported.
The Bundesbank would then transfer the money to the European-Iranian Trade Bank AG (EIH), based in the northern German city of Hamburg, the paper said, quoting financial and political sources.
“We are in talks with the Bundesbank,” the paper cited Neeta Bhushan from the Indian finance ministry as saying.
The arrangement has been given the green light by two ministries in the German government, Handelsblatt said.
<Obama is head of the UN security council – HE COULD STOP THIS! But his ally is the BANKERS in this and not America and American interests. >
Two of the EIH’s main shareholders, Bank Mellat and Bank Refah are subject to European Union sanctions approved last year in addition to UN restrictions, the paper said.
Contacted by AFP, the Bundesbank declined to comment while a spokeswoman for the economy ministry told a regular government briefing that the EIH, also known as the EIHB, was not itself subject to EU or UN sanctions.
“The inclusion of a bank on the (sanctions) list is not something decided by the (German) government but the European Union council,” spokeswoman Sarah Schneid said.
“What counts is involvement of a bank in financing Iran’s nuclear and missile programme … The government investigates closely any indications (of such involvement).”
Chancellor Angela Merkel’s spokesman Steffen Seibert stressed that the bank was under “strict” supervision, with all transfers over €10,000 ($14,000) needing to be reported and all those above €40,000 requiring approval.
Germany has long been under fire for its close business ties with Iran, with the country’s exports there totalling €3.8 billion in 2010, according to official figures.
Berlin’s abstention this month over a UN Security Council resolution — it holds a non-permanent seat — authorising military action in Libya has also angered Germany’s partners and put Merkel under
Leave a Comment » | Article 9 of the US CONSTITUTION - nobility clause, assembly, bloomberg, Capital, communist, communist / socialist / liberal / democrat, corruption, democrat, Dereliction of Duty, environmentalists, Fascist, gathering, George Soros, Globalists, government sensorship, green, green peace, Greenies, Islamists, Liberal, Main Stream Media, Maoist, Marxist, Marxist-Leninist, NEW WORLD ORDER, Political corectness, political correctness, Politically Correct, Progressive, propaganda, propaganda, Republican, RINO, Rupert Murdoch, Social media, socialist, townhall, Tyranny, UN general assembly, unconstitutional government policy, useful idiots, voter fraud, Weapons, welfare | Tagged: Angela Merkel, article 9 of the US Constitution, council, Deutsche Bundesbank, European Union, Germany, India, Iran, nobility, Politics of Germany, Security, Steffen Seibert, UN, United Nations Security Council, United States | Permalink
Posted by txlady706
Turkey – Iran cargo plane carrying “suspicious” cargo is “CLEARED” by Turkey officials and Israel seizes ARMS from Iran. Any connection?March 16, 2011
Turkey frees detained Iran cargo plane, finding ‘nothing illegal’ on board
Plane had been forced to land in Turkey on suspicion it was carrying weapons to Syria, day after ship allegedly bringing arms from Iran to Gaza was seized by Israel.
- Published 17:28 16.03.11
- Latest update 17:28 16.03.11
An Iranian cargo plane, forced to land in southeast Turkey on suspicion it was carrying weapons to Syria, departed on Wednesday after a search squad found nothing illegal on the plane, officials said.
A team trained in chemical, biological, radioactive and nuclear cargo from the Civil Defense Directorate inspected the plane, which landed in the city of Diyarbakir late on Tuesday en route from Tehran to Aleppo in northern Syria, the state-run Anatolian news agency said.
Airport officials said the plane, which had two pilots, an unknown number of crew members and no passengers, was ordered to land on suspicion it was carrying Iranian weapons to Syria.
Selcuk Unal, spokesman for Turkey’s Foreign Ministry, told Reuters: “The plane was allowed to continue on its route after a routine control.” He added the search squads had found “nothing illegal” inside the aircraft.
The forced landing occurred on the same day Israeli naval commandos seized a cargo ship in the Mediterranean Sea carrying what Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said were Iranian-supplied weapons intended for Palestinian militants in the Gaza Strip.
The Israel Defense Forces said the vessel that was captured with Iranian weapons had set off from the Syrian port of Latakia and stopped in Mersin, Turkey, before heading towards Alexandria in Egypt. Turkey was not involved in the arms shipment, it said.
On Wednesday, Israeli Defense Miniser Ehud Barak told reporters at Ashdod Port, where the seized cargo ship was taken, that he hoped Turkey carried out a proper inspection.
“We have seen this plane that was stopped in Turkey, and it must be hoped that there, too, they will conduct checks as required, and that the other players that are involved, too — that everyone in their area do the right things so that this mutual reinforcement of terror and (military) build-up ceases,” Barak said.
Before leaving Diyarbakir, the plane, identified as a Russian-made Ilyushin 62 and bearing Arabic script and green livery, was parked on the tarmac at the airport, which is used for both civilian and military aviation.
Iranian Army Commander-General denies sending weapons to Gaza on “Victoria” ship; Hamas also claims weapons weren’t for them.
“The Zionist regime’s diet is mixed with lies, lies and more lies,” Gen. Amir Ataollah Salehi said. “We deny all false reports.”
The Zionist regime is a usurper,” he added. “There is an Islamic awakening throughout the Middle East and North Africa that sees the damage.”
Salehi said “there is no doubt that Israel is calculating its losses since the departure of the Egyptian Pharoh. God willing, they will sink to the bottom of the Mediterranean Sea.”
He added that “next year the armed forces of the Islamic Republic will be stronger than ever.”
A Hamas spokesman also denied that the weapons aboard the Victoria was headed for them, Israel Radio reported on Wednesday.
The IDF intercepted a cargo vessel, called the Victoria, en route from Turkey to Egypt on Tuesday. The ship was found to contain advanced weaponry, including anti-ship missiles labeled in Farsi, as well as manuals explaining how to use them in Farsi.
The ship was boarded by several teams of commandos from Flotilla 13, known as the Shayetet, and reached the Ashdod port overnight Tuesday.
Yaakov Katz contributed to this report.
Leave a Comment » | Amero - Islamic war, communist, communist / socialist / liberal / democrat, conceal carry, second amendment, gun control, guns, right to bear arms, Open carry, corruption, gathering, Iran, Islamification, ISRAEL, Marxist, Middle East countries, Military, NEW WORLD ORDER, nuclear, Political corectness, Progressive, propaganda, Syria, Terrorist, terrorist or pirate, trade deficit, Treason, Turkey, Tyranny, unconstitutional government policy, useful idiots, Weapons | Tagged: Aleppo, Anatolia, Anatolian Agency, Ashdod Port, Benjamin Netanyahu, Cargo aircraft, Diyarbakır, Gaza Strip, Iran, ISRAEL, Israel Defense Forces, Mediterranean Sea, syria, turkey | Permalink
Posted by txlady706