Transgenders are becoming more violent – Male assaults female over a parking space with a hammer – ban the HAMMERS?

May 12, 2019

Mental illness and the normalization of it (by the WEST) is making many violent

“WOMAN” (who is not bio female) assaults another woman (who is a bio female) with a HAMMER
1- will the hammer be charged? Will Hammers be banned?
2- Will the MAN who has a mental illness be charged?
3- Will the WEST stop normalizing the MENTAL ILLNESS of people who clearly are becoming violent?

Will I need a permit for a hammer now?


Woman gets hammer out in row over disabled bay parking outside KFC


Read more:

Twitter: | Facebook:



Woman gets hammer out in row over disabled bay parking outside KFC Jimmy NsubugaFriday 10 May 2019 12:10 pm Share this article via facebookShare this article via twitterShare this article via messenger 129 SHARES Families brawl with hammers over parking space outside KFC Play Video Loaded: 0% 0:00Progress: 0% PlayMute Current Time 0:00 / Duration Time 1:43 Fullscreen Police have arrested two women after a group of people were filmed fighting outside KFC. A video posted online showed the melee in Stonedale Retail Park, in Liverpool, on Wednesday evening. Police have charged Carol Lea, 55, from St Helens with possessing an offensive weapon in a public place and threatening behaviour. Another woman, 56, also from St Helens, was detained on suspicion of affray and was cautioned for threatening behaviour. A woman was apparently wielding a hammer The incident happened outside KFC in Stonedale Retail Park, in Liverpool (Picture: Google) Officers said a third woman, 19, sustained a head injury after she was allegedly punched and had to be treated in hospital. A police statement statement said: ‘At around 7.15pm, officers were called to Stonedale Retail Park on East Lancs Road to reports of an altercation in a car park near to KFC, and threats being made by a woman in possession of a hammer.’ Lea was released on conditional bail pending further enquiries. Police are continuing to investigate the incident. Anyone with information is asked to contact @MerPolCC on 101 with reference 19100230164 or @CrimestoppersUK anonymously on 0800 555 111.


Read more:





May 9, 2019

forget poetic justice and adjectives to create an idea – Word will do it for you

Microsoft to Release Version of Word That Makes Your Grammar 'Politically Correct'


New features will screen out ‘offensive’ language

Microsoft is set to release a new version of Word that uses artificial intelligence to make your writing ‘politically correct’.

You know how annoying it is when the iPhone corrects ‘fucking’ to ‘ducking’ every time you type out the word? Imagine that for an entire essay.

The new feature, called ‘Ideas in Word’, will recommend ‘sensitive’ phrases like “We need to get some fresh blood in here” be modified so that “fresh blood” becomes “new employees”.

“It might underline places where your writing exhibited gender bias,” reports Fast Company. “If you tend to say “mailman” or Congressman” in the generic, it might suggest you use “mailperson” or “Congressperson.” If you use the term “gentlemen’s agreement,” it may suggest you use “unspoken agreement” instead.”

The term “disabled person” would be replaced with “person with a disability” while the new version’s “inclusiveness check” searches for words or phrases that might be “offensive” to someone from another country or culture.

Mark Sullivan, who is a fan of the new features, says he is worried about “unknowingly or accidentally inserting terms or references in my writing that convey value judgements that I don’t really mean” and wants to avoid “writing something that might offend”.

Rumor has it that every new purchase of Word will come with a voucher for a yearly supply of soy lattes from Starbucks.

NBC terrorist – in custody – threatened to Blow up a Church – MEDIA is coordinating a cover up.

May 1, 2019

Initially reported, but the silence across the media is deafening.  This was an attack on a Church during EASTER.  They were among many #EasterWorshipers that were being attacked that day.  Mental illness is being blamed for much of these attacks.  The attacks keep being described as mental illness have a few things in common.  They keep “hearing” voices.  They have a belief that g-d or spirits are talking to them.  Another thing that I have noticed is that they have, many -not all, have military backgrounds.

Could some have been CONDITIONED?


MSM Blackout of Armed Woman Who Threatened to Blow Up San Diego Church on Easter Morning



A 31-year-old former NBC News producer attempted to attack a San Diego church on Easter morning, where she held her own baby hostage and threatened to blow up a parish.

Despite a blackout in national media coverage, NBC San Diego provided the details about the horrifying incident that the dozens of Christians in attendance were lucky to escape from:

The San Diego Police Department has identified the woman who is accused of walking into an Easter Day service in Clairemont with a baby and a weapon on Sunday.

She is being identified as Anna Conkey, 31, former intern and freelance digital producer for NBC 7. Conkey is also an SDSU graduate and was in the U.S Navy…

Police said Conkey walked into the auditorium of the Mount Everest Academy Sunday afternoon, where a non-denominational church was having an Easter Day service, and began making threats.

According to police, Conkey walked onto the stage and made threats that she was going to blow up the church while she waved a handgun.

The church’s head pastor, Benjamin Wisan, said the woman seemed very agitated and frustrated and “not in her right mind.”

“This girl came through the back of the stage. She had a baby and a gun,” Wisan said. has reported that Conkey is pleading not guilty to a host of charges including three counts of making criminal threats, one count of attempting to make a threat, child abuse, interfering with an officer, possessing a gun in a school zone, making a false bomb report and misdemeanor interfering with a religious service.

Conkey will face over 23 years in prison if she is ultimately convicted of her crimes. Her young baby, who she put in harms way needlessly during her deranged rampage, is now in the state’s custody.

The videos posted on Conkey’s YouTube page indicate that she was very troubled. Posts on her blog show that she believed that God was talking directly to her, she could speak in tongues, she was possessed by spirits, and Jesus Christ appeared to her in dreams. Social justice was a common theme to poetry that she regularly posted.


MSM Blackout of Armed Woman Who Threatened to Blow Up San Diego Church on Easter Morning


——Here’s a very ominous blog — it goes to the mental state (just in case it gets taken down) —



It has occurred to me that I’ve never disclosed my full testimony of how I became a true follower of Jesus. So if you ever find yourself interested, here it is.

I was raised as a Christian. My parents met at a bible study in the Philippines. My mom was a missionary, my dad was a religious program specialist in the Navy, a minister of sorts. So I was always in church activities and around that church atmosphere while growing up.

In fact, my earliest memory is of me as a baby, looking down at my parents, who were looking down at me in a crib. I was above them in a kind of rainbow-cloud, and God was talking to me. He told me, “You have to the be the one to show them the way.” But I didn’t recall this until November 2018, when I specifically asked Jesus to help me remember. He reminded me of this back in 2016, but I thought he was referring to my parents, who I perceived as already godly people that didn’t need any guidance, and so I rejected the message.


Anyway, I’ve always had that strange out-of-body memory, and when I was a child I used pretend I was still with Him. I would talk to Him all the time and remember what He told me. But as I got older, the memories of Him began to fade. Eventually, I started finding church activities boring or hypocritical, and around 14 or 15 I began seriously questioning the authenticity of the Bible—especially anywhere that talked about a “woman’s place.”

My mom was very, “you need to learn how to cook and clean so you can take care of your husband,” and I was very, “why do I have to do more chores than my brother?!” Because of this, I became resentful and “rebellious,” as my mother would call me (to this day I hate cleaning and I never learned to cook till I was married)…but personally, I think I was actually an angel  compared to my brother lol. I never did any drugs, didn’t drink, didn’t even date except for two weeks when I was 16. We held hands while walking home from school, and kissed once at a dance. I think I’d kissed a grand total of 4 boys by the time I was 18.

When I was 19, I ended up joining the Navy as a Mass Communication Specialist, and that’s when things started to go downhill spiritually. For the first two years I was pretty good…but then in 2008, while stationed in Boston, I couldn’t muster the courage to find a church on my own and I ended up being completely influenced by the worldly people around me. Those two years in Boston were the “funnest” days of my life, by the world’s standards, but spiritually my darkest.

God even stepped in on Feb. of 2008, by allowing me to tear my ACL and meniscus in my left knee during a skiing accident (it was my first time skiing too). I’ve long since learned that any time I physically fall it’s a reflection of my walk with God. Unfortunately, I didn’t learn my lesson, and my knee surgery was a failure—but I didn’t know for four years. So, I was in constant pain and my knee was always swelling and popping out of place in a very painful way.

When God brought me back to San Diego in the fall of 2009, I started going to church again, but I still had no real connection with God. And at one point I completely stopped going again because a group of girls at the bible study I attended were very judgmental when I started describing my “dream man” in completely physical terms rather than “spiritual qualifications.” Like, OK sorry I misinterpreted the question, but so did NOT need the snootiness.

“Coincidentally,” when Jesus actually appeared to me for the first time, He met all my physical qualifications lol.

Anyway, in 2011 I was soooo thankful to finally meet a guy who was equally possessive and head over heels for me as I was for him that I turned to God and started giving thanks! Like whooo, thank you Jesus! A good man! We met on deployment in February and  ended up getting married three months after returning from deployment—a total of about 8 months knowing each other. He was not a Christian…but that was OK with me because at that time I didn’t consider myself much of a Christian either.

I think it’s pertinent to add that when my husband suggested we get married, I asked God and received a very loud, very audible NO. But it didn’t come from the region of my head–it came from my heart! So I was looking around like, ” where did that come from?” and I dismissed it as my imagination.

We ended up eloping Nov. 2011 without telling any of our family because we planned to have an actual marriage celebration the following year. By the way, this is also around the time that I began to receive reconstructive surgery for my knee after all those years. I had to have three surgeries over the course of a year to fix the first failed one.

My husband and I did end up having a cute ceremony with all our family in September 2012, and I actually got pregnant later that month after the ceremony. However, I had a miscarriage in October because I was stupid and didn’t know anything about being pregnant. I thought it was AFTER the first trimester that you were most at risk of losing a baby, so I went ahead and rode a bunch of rides at Sea World…I ended up miscarrying within hours of leaving the amusement park. I was only six weeks pregnant, but it was still heartbreaking. I know it was a boy, and he’s waiting for me in heaven. His name is Caleb.

Anyway, after I got married I would have an off-and-on relationship with God. But mostly it was off. Especially after I started attending university where everyone is basically anti-Christ. I got swept up in the feminist movement for about a year, until I realized they only care about themselves and don’t actually care about the people who are hurting, ie., those being abused and sexually exploited through prostitution.

In 2015, as I was studying my degree for journalism, God kept kindling this passion in me for those who have been sexually abused. I would focus on sharing the story of those who had been victimized for nearly every big school project I was assigned. It might seem a little strange, especially since I’ve never been sexually abused myself (unless you count sexual harassment while in the military), but I could not stop hurting for these women who had been traumatized in this way.

Now in college, although I  was older, God blessed me with a kind of age-less personality, which helped me make friends with the younger college girls. I became very close to one in particular. However, she and her friends were all into the New Age movement, which is about mysticism and the occult. Because I was always with her, some of the New Age ideologies were rubbing off on me, and at one point in 2016 I even began to channel a spirit.

Well here’s the backstory. It was late at night in July, and I couldn’t sleep, so I was gazing out my balcony window looking at the stars. One star in particular was very bright, so I just kept looking at it. But the more I looked at it, the more I saw it moving! It became very erratic in its movements, and very visibly moving; I could easily track it with my eyes. It really freaked me out, but I was so fascinated by this star. THEN I saw this light beam shoot out from the star, and within a few moments I saw a pink ball of light moving quickly out of the sky and descend in my direction. It was going up and down like a helicopter behind my apartment complex—like it was looking for something. However, it was completely silent, and moving faster than any aircraft has the ability to! This pink ball of light terrified me so much, I jumped away from my window and back into bed.

I think that ball of light did find me, and it was demonic.

Well about a month later, (August 2016), our family had just moved into a new home, and the fall semester was just beginning at my university. One of my classmates posted an interesting article on twitter about how to “speak wit the universe,” and how the “universe” wants to speak back to us. So I followed the steps, and immediately began channeling. Except I didn’t realize that was what I was doing. I thought I was just conversing with “the universe.”

For about a week, I would open myself to receiving messages from this entity. I would ask questions regarding life and the afterlife; just basic “why is the world like this” questions, and would receive an immediate response. However, the moment I wanted to pray to Jesus I would have an immediate recoil. I would actually avoid speaking the name Jesus out loud, and become hateful of the word. I couldn’t understand why, but felt it was because Jesus was fake and I was in the truth or something.

But for some reason I was watching videos on YouTube and stumbled across a movie called, “The Age of Deceit,” by FaceLikeTheSun. It was a few hours long, and explained how the New Age Movement is all demonic—and how the bible is the ONLY TRUTH. When it talked about channeling, and I realized that’s what I’d been doing, I was immediately on my hands and knees praying for God to forgive me! I felt so dirty that I had to physically wash myself. As I was washing,  I felt the presence of God come over me, and I realized I couldn’t remember anything the demon had told me in response to my questions about life. In fact, I couldn’t even remember the specific questions I had asked. And I know it’s because they were all lies, and God was giving me a new slate so I would no longer be deceived. This was Aug. 28, 2016—the day I was reborn.

I continued delving into “the rabbit hole,” as people in this Truther movement of Christian conspiracy theorists call it. I learned so much about the bible, fallen angels, nephilim, Luciferianism, the New World Order, genetic modification and its relation to the mark of the beast in the Book of Revelation.

I started attending church regularly on Jan. 1, 2017, and about three months later is when I met Jesus for the first time in a very life-changing dream. And that’s the background story of how I came to be where I am now.

Thanks for reading, and I hope it has blessed you in some way.


——She has a video too – very strange – hard to listen to —-


Obama’s misstep – Israel’s ’67 borders would cripple defense and peace – Why suggest it then?

May 24, 2011

I believe that Obama’s goal is the Muslim goal primarily.  He is a Communist secondarily.  He’s an anti Colonialist, as defined by the African definition.  If one is anti – colonialist, then one is against the West and ALL that the WEST represents. This, indeed, means anti – Jewish and Christian, anti- Capitalist and anti – Socialist, this further means anti – Capitalist.  This leave Theocracy and nothing else.  THIS is OBAMA.

This also means that a Caliphate across the ME, would not be objectionable to him.  He is after all a TRUE son to Africa, not America.  Regardless of his birth place, he is African.  He’s SAID so.

Obama’s diversionary tactics

By Caroline B. Glick

What did the president wish to accomplish by purposely starting an ugly fight with the prime minister this past weekend? | As the Washington Post pointed out on Friday, US President Barack Obama purposely provoked the current fight with Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu. He knew full well that Netanyahu does not back the Palestinian formulation that negotiations with Israel must be based on the indefensible 1949 armistice lines, or what are wrongly referred to as the 1967 lines. In the days leading up to Obama’s speech last Thursday, Israel registered explicit, repeated requests that he not adopt the Palestinian position that negotiations should be based on those lines.

And so it was a stinging rebuke when Obama declared Thursday: “The borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps.” According to the Washington Post, Obama wrote these lines of his speech himself and Netanyahu was informed of them just as he was scheduled to fly to the US on Thursday evening. Obama gave the speech while Netanyahu was in the air on his way to Washington to meet Obama the next morning. It is hard to think of a more stunning insult or a greater display of contempt for the leader of a US ally and fellow democracy than Obama’s actions last week. And it is obvious that Netanyahu had no choice but to react forcefully to Obama’s provocation.

The question is why would Obama act as he did? What did he wish to accomplish by purposely starting such an ugly fight with Netanyahu?

Probably the best way to figure out what Obama wished to accomplish is to consider what he did accomplish, because the two are undoubtedly related.

ON MAY 4, two weeks before Obama gave his speech, Fatah and Hamas signed a unity agreement. Hamas is the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. Like its fellow Brotherhood satellite al-Qaida, Hamas shares the Brotherhood’s ideology of global jihad, the destruction of Western civilization and the establishment of a global caliphate. Also like al-Qaida, it is a terrorist organization which, since its establishment in 1987 has murdered more than a thousand Israelis.

In 2005, Hamas subcontracted itself out to the Iranian regime. Since then, its men have been trained by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and by Hezbollah. Hamas maintains operational ties with both outfits and receives most of its weapons and significant funding from Iran.

The agreement between Fatah and Hamas makes Hamas a partner in the leadership of the Palestinian Authority. It also paves the way for Hamas to win the planned Palestinian legislative and presidential elections that are scheduled for September just after the UN General Assembly is scheduled to endorse Palestinian statehood. It also sets the conditions for Hamas to integrate its forces and eventually take over the UStrained Palestinian army in Judea and Samaria and to join the PLO.

The Hamas-Fatah unity deal constitutes a complete repudiation of the assumptions informing Obama’s policies towards the Palestinians and Israel. Obama perceives the conflict as a direct consequence of two things: prior US administrations’ refusal to “put light” between the US and Israel, and Israel’s unwillingness to surrender all of the territory it took during the course of the 1967 Six Day War.

The Hamas-Fatah unity deal is indisputable proof that contrary to what Obama believes, the conflict has nothing to do with previous administrations’ support for Israel or with Israel’s size. It is instead entirely the consequence of the Palestinians’ rejection of Israel’s right to exist and their commitment to bringing about Israel’s destruction.

Forcing Israel into indefensible boundaries, (which as Netanyahu explained to Obama at the White House on Friday, “were not the boundaries of peace, they were the boundaries of repeated wars because the attack on Israel was so attractive for them,”), will not advance the cause of peace. It will advance the Palestinians’ goal of destroying Israel.

Obama had two options for contending with the Palestinian unity deal. He could pay attention to it or he could create a distraction in order to ignore it. If he paid attention to it, he would have been forced to disavow his policy of blaming his predecessors in the White House and Israel for the absence of peace. By creating a distraction he would be able to change the subject in a manner that would enable him to maintain those policies.

And so he picked a fight with Netanyahu. And by picking the fight, he created a distraction that has, in fact, changed the subject and enabled Obama to maintain his policies that have been wholly repudiated by the reality of the Palestinian unity deal.

By inserting the citation of the 1949 armistice lines into his speech, Obama made Israel’s size again the issue.

Political map of Israel with Westbank and Gaza, Golan Heights, and southern Lebanon

Political map of Israel with Westbank and Gaza, Golan Heights, and southern Lebanon

The Hamas-Fatah unity deal actually demonstrates that not only is Israel’s size not the cause of the conflict, it is the main reason that Israelis and Palestinians live in relative peace.

Israel’s control over Judea and Samaria and east Jerusalem, and with them, its ability to ward off invasion and attacks on its major cities is what has prevented wars. If Israel were more vulnerable, the de facto Palestinian terror state would not be weighing whether or not to begin a new terror war as its leaders from Fatah and Hamas are doing today. It would be waging a continuous campaign of terror whose clear aim is Israel’s destruction for again, as Netanyahu said the 1949 armistice lines make war an attractive option for Israel’s enemies.

BY PICKING a fight with Netanyahu, since Thursday, no one could have possibly noted this basic truth because the false issue of Israel’s control over these areas — that is, Israel’s size — has dominated the global discourse on the Middle East.

Obama would never have been able to create his diversion from the unwelcome fact of Palestinian duplicity and rejectionism, to imaginary problem with the size of Israel without the enthusiastic support given to him by the Israeli Left.

Led by opposition leader Tzipi Livni, the Israeli Left responded to Obama’s full-scale assault on Israel’s legitimacy by launching a full-scale partisan assault on Netanyahu. Rather than back Netanyahu as he fights for the country’s future, Livni called for him to resign and said that he was wrecking Israel’s ties with the US. In so doing, the Left provided crucial support for Obama’s move to maintain his phony anti- Israel paradigm for Middle East policymaking in the face of the Palestinian unity deal’s repudiation of that model.

The Left’s assault on Netanyahu is not the only way it has enabled Obama to maintain his pro-Palestinian policies in the face of the Palestinians’ embrace of terror and war. In his speech to AIPAC, Obama argued that Israel needs to surrender its defensible boundaries because the Palestinians are about to demographically challenge Israel’s Jewish majority.

As Obama put it, “The number of Palestinians living west of the Jordan River is growing rapidly and fundamentally reshaping the demographic realities of both Israel and the Palestinian territories. This will make it harder and harder — without a peace deal — to maintain Israel as both a Jewish state and a democratic state.”

The demographic time bomb story is a Palestinian fabrication. In 1997, the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics published a falsified Palestinian census that inflated Palestinian population data by 50 percent. The Israeli Left adopted this fake report as its own when Palestinian terrorism and political warfare convinced the majority of Israelis that it was unwise to give them any more land and that the peace process was a lie.

Since 2004, repeated, in-depth studies of Jewish and Arab birthrates and immigration/ emigration statistics west of the Jordan River undertaken by independent researchers have shown that the demographic time bomb is a dud. In January, the respected demographer Yaakov Faitelson published a study for the Institute of Zionist Strategies in which he definitively put to rest the tale of pending Jewish demographic doom.

As Faitelson demonstrated, Jewish and Arab birthrates are already converging west of the Jordan River at around three children per woman. And whereas the fertility rates of Israeli Arabs, Gazans and residents of Judea and Samaria are all trending downward, Jewish fertility is consistently rising. Moreover, whereas the Arabs are experiencing consistently negative net immigration rates, Jewish net immigration rates are positive and high.

Faitelson based his multiyear projections on current population numbers in which Jews comprise 58.6 percent of the population west of the Jordan River and Muslims constitute 38.7% of the overall population. Non-Jewish, non-Muslim minorities comprise the other 2.7%. Using assessment baselines for Jewish net immigration well below current averages, Faitelson showed that in the years to come, not only will Jews not lose our demographic majority. We will increase it.

Faitelson’s study, like the studies published since 2004 by the American-Israeli Demographic Research Group show that from a demographic perspective, Israel is in the same situation as many Western states today. Namely, it has to develop policies for dealing with an irredentist minority population.

There are many reasonable, liberal policies that Israel can adopt. These include applying the liberal Israeli legal code to Judea and Samaria and enforcing the laws of treason. It is hard to see why the best policy for Israel is to take some of that irredentist population off its books by establishing a terror state ruled by what Netanyahu rightly referred to as “the Israeli equivalent of al-Qaida” on its border.

ALL OF this brings us back to Hamas, terrorism, the Palestinian rejection of Israel’s right to exist, and Obama’s diversionary moves to facilitate his preservation of a Middle East policy based on a wholly false and discredited assessment of reality and the Israeli Left’s facilitation of Obama’s efforts.

When we realize what Obama is up to, we recognize as well what Netanyahu must do in response.

In his address before Congress on today and in all of his appearances in the coming weeks and months, Netanyahu should have one goal: to bring the focus of debate back where it belongs — on the Palestinians.

At every opportunity, Netanyahu needs to pound the message that the Palestinians’ commitment to Israel’s destruction is the sole reason that there is no peace.

As for the Israeli Left, it is high time that Netanyahu place the likes of Livni on the defensive. This involves two things. First, Netanyahu must attack the Left’s doomsday demographic projections that are without factual basis and are indeed antithetical to reality. As long as the demographic lie goes unchallenged by Netanyahu, the Left will continue to argue that by refusing to build a terror state on the outskirts of Tel Aviv, Netanyahu is endangering Israel.

Netanyahu deserves a lot of credit for standing up to Obama on Friday. He showed enormous courage in doing so. It was his finest hour to date and polls over the weekend show that the public appreciates and supports him for it. He must build on that success by putting the focus on the truth.

Obama’s solution – Israel should give up land for peace. Obama’s knowledge of history is stunted as is his logic.

May 23, 2011

Obama’s False Choice

By Jonathan Tobin | In his address to AIPAC Sunday morning, President Obama doubled down on the points he made in his speech on Thursday. After a lengthy, and not entirely unjustified defense of his administration’s record of support for Israel’s security, he continued talking down to the Jewish state and its government as if he knew better than they about the situation in the Middle East.

Following the talking points that the administration has been furiously spinning since Thursday, Obama attempted to explain that there was nothing original or new in his attempt to lay down the 1967 lines as the starting point for future talks. It is true, as he asserted that his line bout “mutually agreed upon swaps” of territory means that the “borders will be different.” But contrary to his claim that this is what past administrations also support, the Bush 2004 letter let it be known that the United States supported Israel’s claims on Jerusalem and the major settlement blocs. Obama is neutral about Israel’s borders. That is why the Palestinians view his support of the 1967 borders as a green light for them to refuse to talk unless Israel agrees to surrender every inch of territory.

Even worse, Obama’s lecture about why Israel must make further concessions in spite of Arab intransigence was condescending and somewhat misleading. Obama said that demographics and technology mean the status quo can’t be sustained and implicitly accused Israel of “procrastination.” But Israel has already offered the Palestinians a state in virtually all of the West Bank, part of Jerusalem and Gaza and been turned down twice. Even the supposedly right-wing government of Benjamin Netanyahu has made its commitment to a two-state solution clear. Obama says Israel can’t wait “another decade or two or three decades” to make peace. But Israel has been trying to make peace for 63 years. The world may be “moving too fast” to wait for peace but why must he lecture the Israelis when it is the Palestinians who refuse to talk, let alone recognize the legitimacy of a Jewish state no matter where its borders are drawn?

 Road Map to Peace

Although Obama rightly declared that the United States would oppose attempts to bypass the peace process via the United Nations, his mention of the 1967 borders will be used, as it has already by the Palestinians, to buttress their attempt to get recognition for an independent state inside those lines with no recognition of Israel.

Like all Obama speeches, the president presented a false choice in which he said the “easy thing” would be to say nothing about the peace process rather than to confront it as he has done. Democratic Party donors will have the final word on how foolish his attempt to ambush Netanyahu this past week. But the real false choice is the notion that it is somehow in Israel’s power to magically create peace. That decision has always been in the hands of the Palestinians and the Arab world. So long as they ally themselves with terrorists and refuse to negotiate and to demand a “right of return” which would destroy Israel (and which Obama again failed to condemn) there will be no peace.

Egyptian spring – What it means to the Christians over there

May 22, 2011

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Egyptian spring – What it means to the Christia…, posted with vodpod

Obama should not be president – Israel is thrown under the bus by POTUS, AND the US is also case asunder by proxy

May 21, 2011
Vodpod videos no longer available.
Jonathan Schanzer: Hamas & Fatah, posted with vodpod

Jonathan Schanzer of the Jewish Policy Institute addressed the Center for Security Policy’s National Security Group on Capitol Hill. He is the author of Hamas vs. Fatah.

Obama’s Abandonment of America

Posted by Caroline Glick on May 20th, 2011 and filed under Daily MailerFrontPage.

Reprinted from

I was out sick yesterday so I was unable to write today’s column for theJerusalem Post. I did manage to watch President Obama’s speech on the Middle East yesterday evening. And I didn’t want to wait until next week to discuss it. After all, who knows what he’ll do by Tuesday?

Before we get into what the speech means for Israel, it is important to consider what it means for America.

Quite simply, Obama’s speech represents the effective renunciation of the US’s right to have and to pursue national interests. Consequently, his speech imperils the real interests that the US has in the region – first and foremost, the US’s interest in securing its national security.

Obama’s renunciation of the US national interests unfolded as follows:

First, Obama mentioned a number of core US interests in the region. In his view these are: “Countering terrorism and stopping the spread of nuclear weapons; securing the free flow of commerce, and safe-guarding the security of the region; standing up for Israel’s security and pursuing Arab-Israeli peace.”

Then he said, “Yet we must acknowledge that a strategy based solely upon the narrow pursuit of these interests will not fill an empty stomach or allow someone to speak their mind.”

While this is true enough, Obama went on to say that the Arabs have good reason to hate the US and that it is up to the US to put its national interests aside in the interest of making them like America. As he put it, “a failure to change our approach threatens a deepening spiral of division between the United States and Muslim communities.”

And you know what that means. If the US doesn’t end the “spiral of division,” (sounds sort of like “spiral of violence” doesn’t it?), then the Muslims will come after America. So the US better straighten up and fly right.

And how does it do that? Well, by courting the Muslim Brotherhood which spawned Al Qaeda, Hamas, Jamma Islamiya and a number of other terror groups and is allies with Hezbollah.

How do we know this is Obama’s plan? Because right after he said that the US needs to end the “spiral of division,” he recalled his speech in Egypt in June 2009 when he spoke at the Brotherhood controlled Al Azhar University and made sure that Brotherhood members were in the audience in a direct diplomatic assault on US ally Hosni Mubarak.

And of course, intimations of Obama’s plan to woo and appease the jihadists appear throughout the speech. For instance:

“There will be times when our short term interests do not align perfectly with our long term vision of the region.”

So US short term interests, like for instance preventing terrorist attacks against itself or its interests, will have to be sacrificed for the greater good of bringing the Muslim Brotherhood to power in democratic elections.

And he also said that the US will “support the governments that will be elected later this year” in Egypt and Tunisia. But why would the US support governments controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood? They are poised to control the elected government in Egypt and are the ticket to beat in Tunisia as well.

Then there is the way Obama abandoned US allies Yemen and Bahrain in order to show the US’s lack of hypocrisy. As he presented it, the US will not demand from its enemies Syria and Iran that which it doesn’t demand from its friends.

While this sounds fair, it is anything but fair. The fact is that if you don’t distinguish between your allies and your enemies then you betray your allies and side with your enemies. Bahrain and Yemen need US support to survive. Iran and Syria do not. So when he removes US support from the former, his action redounds to the direct benefit of the latter.

P Photo/US Navy, Kurt Eischen The USS New Orleans makes its way down the Mississippi River on March 5, 2007. The U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet says two of its vessels -- a submarine, the USS Hartford and an amphibious ship, the USS New Orleans -- collided in the Strait of Hormuz between Iran and the Arabian peninsula early Friday.

Beyond his abandonment of Bahrain and Yemen, in claiming that the US mustn’t distinguish between its allies and its foes, Obama made clear that he has renounced the US’s right to have and pursue national interests. If you can’t favor your allies against your enemies then you cannot defend your national interests. And if you cannot defend your national interests then you renounce your right to have them.

As for Iran, in his speech, Obama effectively abandoned the pursuit of the US’s core interest of preventing nuclear proliferation. All he had to say about Iran’s openly genocidal nuclear program is, “Our opposition to Iran’s intolerance – as well as its illicit nuclear program, and its sponsorship of terror – is well known.”

Well so is my opposition to all of that, and so is yours. But unlike us, Obama is supposed to do something about it. And by putting the gravest threat the US presently faces from the Middle East in the passive voice, he made clear that actually, the US isn’t going to do anything about it.

May 11, 2011

Palestinian State in September? Hamas Says No Way


Palestinian Hamas leader Mahmoud Zahar walks on an Israeli flag while taking part in a rally to mark the upcoming 23rd anniversary since the group's foundation, in Gaza city, Thursday, Dec. 9, 2010. The arabic text reads: "For sure will be destroyed. Israel". AP Photo.

Gaza rulers say September most likely too soon to declare Palestinian independence, as too many questions pertaining to state’s viability remain unanswered

Senior Hamas official Mahmoud al-Zahar said Wednesday that the Islamist movement was somewhat skeptical as to the viability of Fatah’s September-bound bid for statehood.

Speaking with the Palestinian Ma’an News Agency, al-Zahar said that “all the talk of a Palestinian state is… an attempt to pacify us.”

He further wondered as to the nature of the Palestinian state, should it be declared in several months’ time: “Where is the land for this state? Are those living in the West Bank and Gaza to be its citizens? What will be the fate of the five million Palestinians in the diaspora? Are we to give up the right of return?”

He also said that anyone who thinks that a Palestinian state would be accepted by the international community without it recognizing Israel first, “does not understand the (political) landscape.”

Hamas, he said, is willing to accept a Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders, but will maintain its refusal to recognize Israel, since a formal recognition of Israel would “cancel the right of the next generations to liberate the lands.”

Read more at YNet.

Palestinians never miss an opportunity.

In short, every American who is concerned about the security of the United States should be livid. The US President just abandoned his responsibility to defend the country and its interests in the interest of coddling the US’s worst enemies.

AS FOR ISRAEL, in a way, Obama did Israel a favor by giving this speech. By abandoning even a semblance of friendliness, he has told us that we have nothing whatsoever to gain by trying to make him like us. Obama didn’t even say that he would oppose the Palestinians’ plan to get the UN Security Council to pass a resolution in support for Palestinian independence. All he said was that it is a dumb idea.

Obama sided with Hamas against Israel by acting as though its partnership with Fatah is just a little problem that has to be sorted out to reassure the paranoid Jews. Or as he put it, “the recent announcement of an agreement between Fatah and Hamas raises profound and legitimate questions for Israel.”

Hamas is a jihadist movement dedicated to the annihilation of the Jewish people, and the establishment of a global caliphate. It’s in their charter. And all Obama said of the movement that has now taken over the Palestinian Authority was, “Palestinian leaders will not achieve peace or prosperity if Hamas insists on a path of terror and rejection.”

Irrelevant and untrue.

It is irrelevant because obviously the Palestinians don’t want peace. That’s why they just formed a government dedicated to Israel’s destruction.

As for being untrue, Obama’s speech makes clear that they have no reason to fear a loss of prosperity. After all, by failing to mention that US law bars the US government from funding an entity which includes Hamas, he made clear that the US will continue to bankroll the Hamas-controlled Palestinian Authority. So too, the EU will continue to join the US in giving them billions for bombs and patronage jobs. The Palestinians have nothing to worry about. They will continue to be rewarded regardless of what they do.

Then of course there are all the hostile, hateful details of the speech:

He said Israel has to concede its right to defensible borders as a precondition for negotiations;

He didn’t say he opposes the Palestinian demand for open immigration of millions of foreign Arabs into Israel;

He again ignored Bush’s 2004 letter to Sharon opposing a return to the 1949 armistice lines, supporting the large settlements, defensible borders and opposing mass Arab immigration into Israel;

He said he was leaving Jerusalem out but actually brought it in by calling for an Israeli retreat to the 1949 lines;

He called for Israel to be cut in two when he called for the Palestinians state to be contiguous;

He called for Israel to withdraw from the Jordan Valley – without which it is powerless against invasion – by saying that the Palestinian State will have an international border with Jordan.

Conceptually and substantively, Obama abandoned the US alliance with Israel. The rest of his words – security arrangements, demilitarized Palestinian state and the rest of it – were nothing more than filler to please empty-headed liberal Jews in America so they can feel comfortable signing checks for him again.

Indeed, even his seemingly pro-Israel call for security arrangements in a final peace deal involved sticking it to Israel. Obama said, “The full and phased withdrawal of Israeli military forces should be coordinated with the assumption of Palestinian security responsibility in a sovereign, non-militarized state.”

What does that mean “with the assumption of Palestinian security responsibility?”

It means we have to assume everything will be terrific.

All of this means is that if Prime Minister Netanyahu was planning to be nice to Obama, and pretend that everything is terrific with the administration, he should just forget about it. He needn’t attack Obama. Let the Republicans do that.

But both in his speech to AIPAC and his address to Congress, he should very forthrightly tell the truth about the nature of the populist movements in the Middle East, the danger of a nuclear Iran, the Palestinians’ commitment to Israel’s destruction; the lie of the so-called peace process; the importance of standing by allies; and the critical importance of a strong Israel to US national security.

He has nothing to gain and everything to lose by playing by the rules that Obama is trying to set for him.

%d bloggers like this: