Vodpod videos no longer available.
2 Comments | Airforce, Army, At the white house, gathering, ISRAEL, jordan, Judaism, Middle East countries, Military, Palestine, Religion | Tagged: Barack Obama, Benjamin Netanyahu, ISRAEL, middle east, obama, Prime Minister of Israel, United States, White House | Permalink
Posted by txlady706
Obama should not be President – Obama is setting Israel up for a WAR and the same logic would lead to a WAR in the US – He is setting a DANGEROUS precedentMay 21, 2011
This President is dangerous to the US. The logic that started the war in Libya has nothing to do with Gadhafi, per se. It has to do with setting the stage. This president is not a leader. He IS an actor. The stage is being prepared by others. He is only the lead role at the moment. And this is WHY he is dangerous. Nothing is REAL. It’s all staged. No one that is a REAL player gets hurt, according to the globalists.
I’m convinced that there is a fracturing in the Globalists clique. Some of them are Global Capitalists and others are Global Communists. There is an ideological strife a foot. The reason I believe that is because there are leaks of information surfacing that would otherwise NOT be there.
Be that as it may, the other agents in play are the Muslims. They are outmaneuvering the Globalists on some fronts and the Globalists are making hasty errors in judgement. They are forced to move more quickly, but some have already made deals with the other side. Those, I believe, are the Capitalists, because they have only one goal, money, but not money in that they have paper or stuff like that, but money in terms of true wealth and that is Control driven. They have to get CONTROL of the commonly accepted currency, because in the end, that is their only truest commodity.
So, how does that correlate to Gadhafi and how does that set the stage for a war that the US be subjected to?
It’s the Logic. The UN is the Global GUN. The reason that Gadhafi was attacked is to begin to set the precedent and NO other reason. The next casualty will be potentially Syria, in my opinion. The following, and this may not occur until AFTER the election, is Israel. And the reasoning is nice outlined below, in Gaffeney’s article. However, I would take it a step farther. The same situation is setting itself up here too, in the US. The next casualty, may indeed be, the US. Hezbollah and Hamas have set up shop in South America and Mexico. They are taking over the cartels. They got their FEET in the door by selling weapons and training the Cartels. Now, they are tenured within those “armies.” The same situation is setting itself up. What difference is there in logic? It is the same. The Palestinian’s cry that they were removed from their land. The Mexicans cry the same. US children are being taught toward sedition and outright treason of their own country by “teachers” whose agenda is to overthrow the state that they teach. Even the methods are the same between the Palestinians and what they are doing to Israel and what the “Mexican’s” are doing to the US. The similarities should not go unnoticed. The fish ALWAYS stinks from the HEAD.
<thanks to Mandy for the Gaffney article.>
I would also like to mention that Obama sitting as the head of the UN security council is a direct violation of the nobility clause in Article 9 of the US CONSTITUTION.
The ATF who’s under the Homeland security, which the CIA is also under, is headed by a CZAR. This agency is NOT steered by an elected official. This is an appointment by the PRESIDENT. These CZAR headed agencies have taken control of legitimate agencies and are run by executive fiat. This is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. How is it that they have been allowed these POWERS? These agencies have seized control of America. They overrule the Constitutional limitations of power.
Communist China may be bad, but America is going to be much worse, if this continues unchecked.
The Gadhafi precedent: Could attack on Libya set the stage for action against Israel?
By Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | There are many reasons to be worried about the bridge-leap the Obama administration has just undertaken in its war with Col. Moammar Gadhafi. How it will all end is just one of them.
Particularly concerning is the prospect that what we might call the Gadhafi precedent will be used in the not-too-distant future to justify and threaten the use of U.S. military forces against an American ally: Israel.
Here’s how such a seemingly impossible scenario might eventuate:
It begins with the Palestinian Authority seeking a United Nations Security Council resolution that would recognize its unilateral declaration of statehood. Three top female officials in the Obama administration reprise roles they played in the council’s recent action on Libya: U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice, a vehement critic of Israel, urges that the United States support (or at least not veto) the Palestinians’ gambit. She is supported by the senior director for multilateral affairs at the National Security Council, Samantha Power, who in the past argued for landing a “mammoth force” of American troops to protect the Palestinians from Israel. Ditto Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, whose unalloyed sympathy for the Palestinian cause dates back at least to her days as first lady.
This resolution enjoys the support of the other four veto-wielding Security Council members – Russia, China, Britain and France – as well as all of the other nonpermanent members except India, which joins the United States in abstaining. As a result, it is adopted with overwhelming support from what is known as the “international community.”
With a stroke of the U.N.’s collective pen, substantial numbers of Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and Israeli citizens find themselves on the wrong side of internationally recognized borders. The Palestinian Authority (PA) insists on its long-standing position: The sovereign territory of Palestine must be rid of all Jews.
The Israeli government refuses to evacuate the oft-condemned “settlements” now on Palestinian land or to remove the IDF personnel, checkpoints and facilities rightly seen as vital to protecting their inhabitants and, for that matter, the Jewish state itself.
Hamas and Fatah bury the hatchet (temporarily), forging a united front and promising democratic elections in the new Palestine. There, as in Gaza – and probably elsewhere in the wake of the so-called “Arab awakening” – the winner likely will be the Muslim Brotherhood, whose Palestinian franchise is Hamas.
The unified Palestinian proto-government then seeks international help to “liberate” its land. As with the Gadhafi precedent, the first to act is the Arab League. Its members unanimously endorse the use of force to protect the “Palestinian people” and end the occupation of the West Bank by the Israelis.
Turkey, which is still a NATO ally despite its ever-more-aggressive embrace of Islamism, is joined by Britain and France – two European nations increasingly hostile to Israel – in applauding this initiative in the interest of promoting “peace.” They call on the U.N. Security Council to authorize such steps as might be necessary to enforce the Arab League’s bidding.
Once again, Team Obama’s leading ladies – Mrs. Clinton, Ms. Power and Ms. Rice – align to support the “will of the international community.” They exemplify and are prepared to enforce the president’s willingness to subordinate U.S. sovereignty to the dictates of transnationalism and his personal hostility toward Israel. The concerns of Mr. Obama’s political advisers about alienating Jewish voters on the eve of the 2012 election are trumped by presidential sympathy for the Palestinian right to a homeland.
Accordingly, hard as it may be to believe given the United States’ long-standing role as Israel’s principal ally and protector, Mr. Obama acts in accordance with the Gadhafi precedent. He warns Israel that it must take steps immediately to dismantle its unwanted presence inside the internationally recognized state of Palestine lest it face the sort of U.S.- enabled “coalition” military measures now under way in Libya. In this case, they would be aimed at neutralizing IDF forces on the West Bank – and beyond, if necessary – in order to fulfill the “will of the international community.”
Of course, such steps would not result in the ostensibly desired endgame, namely “two states living side by side in peace and security.” If the current attack on Libya entails the distinct possibility of unintended (or at least unforeseen) consequences, application of the Gadhafi precedent to Israel seems certain to produce a very different outcome from the two-state “solution”: Under present and foreseeable circumstances, it will unleash a new regional war, with possible worldwide repercussions.
At the moment, it seems unlikely that the first application in Libya of the Gadhafi precedent will have results consistent with U.S. interests. Even if a positive outcome somehow is forthcoming there, should Mr. Obama and his anti-Israel troika of female advisers be allowed, based on that precedent, to realize the foregoing hypothetical scenario, they surely would precipitate a new international conflagration, one fraught with truly horrific repercussions – for Israel, the United States and freedom-loving people elsewhere.
A Congress that was effectively sidelined by Team Obama in the current crisis had better engage fully, decisively and quickly if it is to head off such a disastrous reprise.
– Here’s another article as food for thought –
WHY THE FRAMERS INCLUDED THE “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” CLAUSE
by Tom Deacon
(May 16, 2010) — Section 1 ofArticle II of the United States Constitution sets forth the eligibility requirements for serving as President of the United States:
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
Try to understand this: At the time of the adoption of the Constitution there were no “natural born Citizens” (no country yet = no citizens, period?), so yes, the Founders wrote in a “grandfather” clause to allow those present (already born) at the time the Constitution was signed to qualify to be president. However, if you weren’t born yet when the Constitution was adopted (that includes Obama), then you had to be a “natural born Citizen,” meaning both parents must be U.S. citizens. It is amazing how tough this is for some people to understand. The reason Congress “investigated” McCain was because he was not born in the USA. They concluded in their report that that was OK, because his “parents” (notice the plural form of “parents”) were both U.S. Citizens. This is not true for Obama, and he clearly was not held to the same standard.
The Constitution says you must be a natural born Citizen, or a citizen at the time the Constitution was adopted. The Founders wanted the president to be a natural born Citizen, but they recognized that there were NO natural born Citizens until after the Constitution was adopted. They didn’t know that 200+ years from the signing, the education system would have dumbed down the USA’s population to the point that understanding it was an endangered ability.
Some may believe the natural born Citizen clause isn’t fair. The Founders of our nation believed it was the right thing to do because they had just fought a war with those who had allegiance to a country other than the one they were fighting to create….that country was the one they left to come to America, namely, England. The Founders did not want to elect a newborn to the office of the president, nor did they want to wait 35 years for a natural born Citizen to meet the age requirement to be president. So they grandfathered themselves in with the statement “or a Citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution.” No doubt they trusted themselves and their children who were born prior to the signing of the Constitution to be loyal only to the USA, fighting a war with England would have had that effect on them.
Obama is the “poster child’ who proves once again that the wisdom of America’s Founders was impeccable.
You can make up excuses till the earth fries from global warming, but you can’t change the truth.
8 Comments | Airforce, Amero - Islamic war, Aristocracy, Army, Article 9 of the US CONSTITUTION - nobility clause, ASIA, assembly, assembly, At the white house, ATF, ATF, Burqa / Niqab, Catholicism, China, communist, communist / socialist / liberal / democrat, conceal carry, second amendment, gun control, guns, right to bear arms, Open carry, corruption, CZARS, democrat, Dereliction of Duty, economy, Education- or lack there of, Egypt, Elena Kagan, ELITE, environmentalists, FACEBOOK, Fascist, First Amendment and Freedom of speech foreign and domestic, flotilla, FOURTH AMENDMENT - illegal search and seizure, gathering, George Soros, Globalists, government sensorship, green, green peace, Greenies, gun, Healthcare, history, illegals, infectious disease, Iran, Iraq, Islamification, Islamists, ISRAEL, jordan, Judaism, Kosovo, Lebanon, Libel, Liberal, Libya, Main Stream Media, Mao and Che Guevara, Maoist, Marxist, Marxist-Leninist, meeting, Middle East countries, Military, mortars, Napolitano, Navy, NEW WORLD ORDER, nuclear, Obama - the Muslim, OBAMA APPOINTMENTS, OBAMACARE, Pakistan, Palestine, Pol Pot, Political corectness, political correctness, Politically Correct, Progressive, propaganda, propaganda, Rahm Emanuel, Religion, Republican, RINO, ROTC, Rupert Murdoch, Saudi Arabia, second amendment, SECURITY ADVISOR, Sedition, Social media, socialist, speaking against ISLAM or Muslims or Mohammed, Syria, Taqiyah lie, taqiyya, takiyah, takiyya, takiya, Terrorist, terrorist or pirate, Town Hall, townhall, townhall, trade deficit, Treason, Turkey, twin towers, Tyranny, unconstitutional government policy, useful idiots, voter fraud, Weapons, welfare, Women and Children used as FODDER by MUSLIMS | Tagged: Barack Obama, Benjamin Netanyahu, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Israel Defense Forces, Mahmoud Abbas, middle east, Palestinian National Authority, Palestinian people, United Nations, United Nations Security Council, United States | Permalink
Posted by txlady706
Obama Should Not Be President – OUR PRESIDENT has just called for the ETHNIC cleansing of the JEWS from their own land. This is not a “border” issue. This is ETHNIC CLEANSINGMay 20, 2011
The arguments are the same. The logic is equivalent.
If it is logical that Israel should give up their land then, the US should release the WEST to Mexico.
If the AZTECS want to CEDE from Mexico, because it was the SPANISH who came to Mexico, then should Mexico give up that portion of territory to them? It was the Spaniards who unified a country of INDIANS and then settled it. Doe that sound familiar?
Since the Jews would be cast out of their lives in their own country, then would that not indeed be the SAME as what occurred in Europe to the Czechs? and many other places where Jews and gypsies were driven out?
That is called ethnic cleansing.
OUR PRESIDENT has just called for the ETHNIC cleansing of the JEWS from their own land.
wiki defined ethnic cleansing:
Ethnic cleansing “is a purposeful policy designed by one ethnic or religious group to remove by violent and terror-inspiring means the civilian population of another ethnic or religious group from certain geographic areas. (Commission of Experts Established Pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 780)”.
This presidents logic, if transposed on our own situation, would create an ethnic cleansing here. If he didn’t follow the SAME logic, then the WORLD would see America as a hypocrite. Which, would not be favorable to all you appeasers out there. It’s a LOOSE / LOOSE LOGIC.
This argument WILL come up and be used. Mark my words.
Rabbi: ‘The President of the United States is Asking for Ethnic Cleansing’
Thursday, May 19, 2011
By Fred Lucas
(CNSNews.com) – President Barack Obama has made an unprecedented demand on Israel, Jewish leaders said Thursday, after the president called for Israel to redraw its borders to where they were in 1967 before the Six Day War. One rabbi said Obama was, in essence, asking for “ethnic cleansing” of thousands of Jewish families.
“It’s immoral in that basically the president of the United States is asking that 500,000 people who live, work, and raise families around Jerusalem – Jewish families – that they be uprooted, resettled, deported from their homes, have their families broken,” Rabbi Aryeh Spero, founder of Caucus for America, told CNSNews.com.
“The president of the United States is asking for ethnic cleansing,” said Rabbi Spero. “It’s ironic that the president, who speaks in humanitarian tones regarding the Palestinians, doesn’t have any humanitarian concerns toward 500,000 Jewish people and families that will be uprooted and deported from their homes.”
Obama made the demand on Israel during a speech on the Middle East, delivered at the State Department on Thursday, as a way to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But Spero believes Obama was not being honest.
“Every time Israel relinquishes land on the altar of peace, it gets not peace but rockets,” Spero said. “This has been played over and over by the Palestinian Authority, then with Yasser Arafat, with Hamas. He knows what will happen with the Israelis, and yet it doesn’t seem to bother him.”
“I’m just very disappointed that my president seems to be so indifferent to the plight of the Jewish people in Israel,” he said.
Though Israel has given up land to Palestinians in the past because of pressure from the United States, no U.S. president has asked this much, said Rabbi Gershon Tannenbaum, director of the Rabbinical Alliance of America.
“It’s par for the course, but not to this extent,” Tannenbaum told CNSNews.com. “In other words, other presidents have also pressured Israel with the hope of achieving some kind of peace. But considering the history and considering facts on the ground, no president has been as severe as President Obama.”
However, Tannenbaum thinks the proposal is a non-starter primarily because the borders have never been the issue.
“The suggestion is going to die, this is not going to work,” he said. “It won’t go anywhere. If you notice, there was an attack on all the borders of the state of Israel. There was an attack on the 1967 borders. The problem with Israel for the Palestinians is the very existence of the state of Israel — not its borders — but that it exists at all. They will not rest until there is no Israel.”
But Spero is not so sure the proposal will just go away, even without support from Congress.
“While he [Obama] can’t force the Jewish people out of their lands, he can certainly pressure Israel to the point where it finds itself in a very insecure state of affairs,” said Rabbi Spero. “He could without certain military weapons and parts that are needed for Israel’s defense. So, it’s a tremendous amount of intimidation and pressure.”
Israel expanded its territory after the Six Day War defeating Egypt, Jordan and Syria. Israel gained the West Bank, the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem, the Gaza Strip, and the Sinai Peninsula (the Sinai was returned to Egypt in a deal brokered in 1978). Since 1967, and most notably in the early 1990s, Israel gave up significant amounts of land for peace to the Palestinians. The conflict has nevertheless raged onward.
“The reason Israel today is bigger than it was in 1967 is because the Arab countries united in an attack against Israel,” Tannenbaum said. “Miraculously, Israel fought them off and won. Now Israel has returned a majority of the West Bank and Israel has returned the Gaza Strip. There still is no peace. So at this point, returning more land is counterproductive and is not the answer. And the president is wrong in his plan.”
On the eve of a visit to the U.S. by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the timing of the announcement seemed calculating, said Rabbi Yehuda Levin, a spokesman for the Rabbinical Alliance of America.
“I’m not a political Zionist,” said the rabbi. “I have my problems with the state of Israel and the things that they do that flies in the face of our religious traditional heritage. Nevertheless, in terms of security for human beings, one has to be totally concerned. I have many family members and extended family members and fellow Jews in Israel and I’m concerned for their safety.”
“I’m just prayerful that the Congress of the United States will respond to the Jewish people and residents of Israel that the position of one human being as president does not reflect what the country feels,” Levin said.
Obama recognized the negotiations would be a challenge because of the agreement between the Fatah, the leading Palestinian political party and the terrorist group Hamas, but he reaffirmed America’s relationship with Israel.
Still the speech has sparked concern and widespread coverage.
“We welcome the president’s recognition of Israel’s security needs and that Hamas cannot be a partner in the peace process, but a call to a return to 1967 borders as the basis for negotiations, even with ‘land swaps’ is a non-starter, when at least half of the Palestinian rulers are committed to Israel’s destruction,” said Rabbis Marvin Hier and Abraham Cooper, founder of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in a written statement. “The road to peace has been clear for a long time — direct negotiations between parties who recognize each other’s legitimacy.”
Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla), in a statement released after the president’s speech, said: “This proposal is a slap in the face of our friend and democracy’s only ally in the Middle East: Israel. As a nation, we should support and promote freedom and democracy in the region, but we should not do so at the expense of Israel. That land belongs to Israel – period.”
“Based on archeological evidence and historical right, that land belongs to Israel,” said Inhofe. “As I have outlined several times before, Israel is a strategic ally to the United States that acts as a roadblock to terrorism. Every other country in that region hates Israel and would stop at nothing for Israel’s destruction just as they would stop at nothing to see our own destruction.”
“President Obama’s speech today kowtows to the very forces that hate us,” said the senator. “I will try to address all these issues on the Senate floor next week to refute President Obama’s message today.”
8 Comments | afghanistan, Amero - Islamic war, assembly, At the white house, Burqa / Niqab, Catholicism, communist, communist / socialist / liberal / democrat, corruption, democrat, Dereliction of Duty, Egypt, environmentalists, Fascist, gathering, Globalists, government sensorship, green, green peace, Greenies, history, Honnor killings, illegals, Islamification, Islamists, ISRAEL, jordan, Judaism, Libel, Liberal, Main Stream Media, Maoist, Marxist, Marxist-Leninist, meeting, Middle East countries, Military, Napolitano, NEW WORLD ORDER, Obama - the Muslim, Palestine, Political corectness, political correctness, Politically Correct, Progressive, propaganda, propaganda, Religion, Republican, RINO, Saudi Arabia, Sedition, sharia, sick, Social media, socialist, Syria, Terrorist, Treason, Turkey, Tyranny, UN general assembly, unconstitutional government policy, useful idiots, voter fraud, Weapons, welfare | Tagged: Barack Obama, Benjamin Netanyahu, ethnic cleansing, Family of Barack Obama, Gaza Strip, ISRAEL, Israeli–Palestinian conflict, jews, middle east, President of the United States, United States | Permalink
Posted by txlady706
No only is the uprising in the ME NOT Democratic, it’s a sort of CIVIL WAR.
I say civil war, because if one looks at the entire area as PERSIA and Muslim, then the area and issue becomes VERY clear.
Iran is not the head. There is no HEAD. The HEAD is ISLAM.
The wars are over control of the region. The issue is who will be the leader of the coming LARGER fight. Who wins here is who will take the baton of ISLAM to carry it forward in to the NEW MILLENNIAL.
2011 is 1432 H in Islam.
Bahrain Sees Hezbollah Plot in Protest
In Report to U.N., Government Says Lebanese Militant Group Has Been Working to Overthrow Ruling Khalifa Family
by Jay Solomon
Bahrain has accused the Iranian-backed militia Hezbollah with seeking to overthrow the island-state’s ruling family, in a report to the United Nations, escalating the growing cold war between Sunni Arab states and Shiite-dominated Iran.
The confidential report, sent to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon last week, alleges that Hezbollah has been training Bahraini opposition figures at camps in Lebanon and Iran. Bahrain’s government also accuses Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and other senior members of the Islamist Lebanese organization of directly plotting with Bahrain’s largely Shiite opposition on how to challenge the ruling Khalifa family.
Iran, Hezbollah and Bahrain’s opposition movement deny …
Below is a good understanding of the ME. Look at each countries -“Constitution and the Rule of Law .” This will give a good feel for each.
Hizballah to pull its heavy missiles from Syrian safekeeping
DEBKAfile Exclusive Report May 1, 2011, 9:30 PM (GMT+02:00)
The Lebanese Shiite Hizballah has obviously decided the Assad regime is sinking.DEBKAfile’s military sources report the organization is preparing to pull its heavy, long-range weapons out of storage in Syrian military facilities – no longer sure they are safe there – and risk transporting them to Lebanon.
Last year, Syrian President Bashar Assad agreed to store Hizballah’s incoming Iran-made Fatah-110 surface missiles and its Syrian equivalent the M-600 and the mobile SA-8 (Gecko) anti-air battery which holds 18 warheads with a maximum range of 12 kilometers. Tehran paid for the upkeep of the Hizballah hardware on Syrian side of the border after Israel threatened to bomb these potential game-changers if they crossed over.
Deployed at Hizballah bases in Lebanon, the Fatah-110 and M-600 would place almost every corner of Israel within range of bombardment, while the SA-8 would seriously restrict Israeli Air Force operations over southern Lebanon and Galilee.
However, as the uprising against Assad rolls ever closer to Damascus, Hizballah see a very real threat of it infecting the Syrian army and has decided that now might be its last chance to get hold of the core arsenal it has standing by for war with Israel before events get out of hand in Syria.
Hizballah’s headquarters in Dahya, Beirut, became alarmed when they heard about strong resentment building up in the Syrian 11th Division over the Assad crackdown against the dissidents – among officers as well as other ranks.
The 11th Division, which is camped outside Aleppo, is the best trained and organized of all Syrian army units, equipped as its strategic reserve with the most advanced weaponry. If the unrest has reached this elite unit, Hizballah reckons there is no time to losing for pulling its missiles out of Syrian military safekeeping.
Meanwhile, top Hizballah and Iranian offices in Tehran are working on the best way to transport the missiles into Lebanon without exposing them to Israeli attack, DEBKAfile’s Iranian sources report. Some of them calculate that Israel would not venture to strike them while still on Syrian soil because it would lay itself open to interfering, or even getting in the way of, the revolt against President Assad and playing into his hands.
A security emergency might well take the wind out of protest movement’s sails.
But already, Tehran’s Lebanese surrogate is beginning to distance itself from Bashar Assad, its longtime strategic partner and arms supplier, having decided he has his back to the wall. April 28, the Hizballah-controlled Lebanese Al Akhbar newspaper started criticizing the Assad regime on its op-ed pages.
Leave a Comment » | afghanistan, African countries, Airforce, Amero - Islamic war, Aristocracy, Army, ATF, Burqa / Niqab, communist, communist / socialist / liberal / democrat, corruption, democrat, Dereliction of Duty, Egypt, ELITE, environmentalists, Fascist, Globalists, green, green peace, Greenies, illegals, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Islamification, Islamists, ISRAEL, jordan, Kenya, Kosovo, Kuwait, Lebanon, Lenanon, Libel, Liberal, Libya, Main Stream Media, Mao and Che Guevara, Maoist, Marxist, Marxist-Leninist, Middle East countries, Military, Napolitano, Navy, NEW WORLD ORDER, nuclear, Obama - the Muslim, Pakistan, Palestine, Pol Pot, Political corectness, political correctness, Politically Correct, Progressive, propaganda, propaganda, Republican, RINO, ROTC, Saudi Arabia, Sedition, Serbia, sharia, Social media, socialist, Somalia, Syria, Terrorist, terrorist or pirate, Turkey, Tyranny, useful idiots, voter fraud, Weapons, welfare, Women and Children used as FODDER by MUSLIMS | Tagged: Bahrain, Ban Ki-moon, Bashar al-Assad, Hassan Nasrallah, hezbollah, Iran, lebanon, Shia Islam, Sunni Islam, syria, United Nations | Permalink
Posted by txlady706
Osama is dead. Ding Dong, the witch is dead….
Meanwhile OZ is still pulling the strings and Hezbollah takes the lead.
This is like passing the football.
Osama killed but Hezbollah increasing its power in Lebanon
May 2nd, 2011 7:04 am ET
While millions of Americans are celebrating the killing of the world’s Number One terrorist, Osama bin Laden, the global war on terrorism is far from over. Intelligence reports coming out of Israel and Lebanon reveal some disturbing events taking place in Lebanon.
Since the Second Lebanon War in 2006, Hezbollah has increased its power in munitions and number of operatives with tens of thousands of weapons stored in civilian villages throughout southern Lebanon, a direct violation of UN Resolution 1701, according to an Israeli Defense Force intelligence report.
According to the IDF Spokesperson, the Hezbollah terrorist organization is spread out between as many as 1,000 facilities in southern Lebanon, located in 270 civilian villages. The organization continues to acquire munitions and strengthen, funded by Syria which is also smuggling weapons to it. This includes weapons which can reach populations in the center of Israel in cities such as Tel Aviv.
According to IDF intelligence, since the end of the Second Lebanon War in 2006, Hezbollah has built more that 500 bunkers in the southern Lebanon region, each one holding various weapons. In addition, the organization has built about 300 underground facilities and 100 storage units for munitions including rockets, missiles and other weapons.
The terrorist group has made certain these terror centers filled with explosives and munitions are located near hospitals, private homes and schools.
“Apparently this is Hezbollah’s way of taking advantage of the civilian population of Lebanon. And the sad thing is the news media and United Nations know this situation exists but they don’t allow the truth to stop them from condemning Israel when it must ‘take out” one of these facilities and there’s collateral damage,” said former Marine intelligence officer and police executive Mike Snopes.
According to the IDF Northern Command, Hezbollah militants have doubled in number since the end of the last war.
Today, Hezbollah is estimated to have an arsenal of more than 40,000 rockets. This being the case, if war breaks out, Hezbollah will be able to launch between 500 and 600 rockets at Israel every day. One of the organization’s main civilian centers for storing munitions is the village of Al Khiyam in southern Lebanon, where hundreds of rockets and mortar shells with varying ranges are stored. More than 100 Hezbollah militants operate in the village, including special forces ready for combat with IDF soldiers.
Hezbollah is thus trying to distort the balance of power in Lebanon and return to full, routine militant activity in southeast Lebanon, similar to its activity levels just prior to the war in 2006. Hezbollah militant activities are based in southern Lebanon, funded and maintained by Syria and Iran. All of these are in direct violation to the UN Security Council’s 1701 decision.
Jim Kouri, CPP, formerly Fifth Vice-President, is currently a Board Member of the National Association of Chiefs of Police, an editor for ConservativeBase.com, and he’s a columnist for Examiner.com. In addition, he’s a blogger for the Cheyenne, Wyoming Fox News Radio affiliate KGAB (www.kgab.com). Kouri also serves as political advisor for Emmy and Golden Globe winning actor Michael Moriarty. He’s former chief at a New York City housing project in Washington Heights nicknamed “Crack City” by reporters covering the drug war in the 1980s. In addition, he served as director of public safety at a New Jersey university and director of security for several major organizations. He’s also served on the National Drug Task Force and trained police and security officers throughout the country. Kouri writes for many police and security magazines including Chief of Police, Police Times, The Narc Officer and others. He’s a news writer and columnist for AmericanDaily.Com, MensNewsDaily.Com, MichNews.Com, and he’s syndicated by AXcessNews.Com. Kouri appears regularly as on-air commentator for over 100 TV and radio news and talk shows including Fox News Channel, Oprah, McLaughlin Report, CNN Headline News, MTV, etc.
To subscribe to Kouri’s newsletter write to COPmagazine@aol.com and write “Subscription” on the subject line.
Osama killed but Hezbollah increasing its power in Lebanon – National Law Enforcement | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/law-enforcement-in-national/osama-killed-but-hezbollah-increasing-its-power-lebanon#ixzz1LhQCHst7
1 Comment | afghanistan, Airforce, Amero - Islamic war, Aristocracy, Army, ATF, Burqa / Niqab, censorship, communist, communist / socialist / liberal / democrat, corruption, CZARS, democrat, Dereliction of Duty, Egypt, ELITE, environmentalists, Fascist, Flight 93, Memorials, Twin Towers, World Trade Center, Ft Hood, George Soros, Globalists, green, green peace, Greenies, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Iraq, Islamification, Islamists, ISRAEL, jordan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Lebanon, Lenanon, Libel, Liberal, Libya, Main Stream Media, Maoist, Marxist, Marxist-Leninist, Mexico and the Border war, Middle East countries, Military, Navy, NEW WORLD ORDER, Obama - the Muslim, OBAMA APPOINTMENTS, Pakistan, Palestine, Political corectness, political correctness, Politically Correct, Progressive, propaganda, propaganda, Republican, RINO, ROTC, Rupert Murdoch, Saudi Arabia, SECURITY ADVISOR, Sedition, Serbia, sharia, sick, Social media, socialist, Somalia, speaking against ISLAM or Muslims or Mohammed, Syria, Taqiyah lie, taqiyya, takiyah, takiyya, takiya, Terrorist, terrorist or pirate, Treason, Turkey, Tyranny, unconstitutional government policy, useful idiots, voter fraud, Weapons, welfare, Women and Children used as FODDER by MUSLIMS | Tagged: 2006 Lebanon War, Fox News Channel, hezbollah, ISRAEL, Israel Defense Forces, lebanon, osama bin laden, Southern Lebanon | Permalink
Posted by txlady706
OBAMA wants to PUSH for illegal alien amnesty – Hezbollah and Hamas agents can’t wait to be legalized.May 7, 2011
Sanctuary cities aren’t enough?
Mexico – Hezbollah and Hamas is partnered with drug cartels – ties to Lebanon – tunnels in San Diego
Terrorists are using Americans and Mexicans to conduct all sorts of operations and this idiot is wanting to OPEN the borders?
Obama to push immigration reform in Texas; Rep. Lamar Smith says it’s ‘unlikely he will succeed anytime soon’
Obama is traveling to El Paso where he will call on Congress to fix the nation’s broken immigration system and address the 11 million immigrants in this country illegally – including 1.6 million in Texas.
“I want to work with Republicans and Democrats to protect our borders, to enforce our laws and also to address the status of millions of undocumented workers,” Obama told Latino leaders at a “Cinco de Mayo” reception at the White House.
Immigration reform has stalled in Congress and Obama conceded that passing comprehensive legislation “is not going to be easy.”
“We’ve got to keep doing the hard work of changing minds and changing hearts and changing votes, one at a time,” said Obama, who will deliver his speech in El Paso on Tuesday before traveling to Austin for a fundraiser.
Republican leaders in the GOP-controlled House are opposed to measures that would grant citizenship or legal status to immigrants who entered the country illegally.
“The president wasn’t able to pass his version of immigration reform when he had large Democratic majorities in the House and Senate because of bipartisan opposition, so it’s unlikely he will succeed anytime soon,” said Rep. Lamar Smith, R-San Antonio, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.
The last sweeping immigration reform bill died in the Senate in 2007.
Republicans, like Texas Sen. John Cornyn said the president has failed to secure the border and failed to build consensus needed to pass reform legislation.
“What Sen. Cornyn is looking for President Obama cannot deliver with another speech or photo op, and that’s presidential leadership. Words matter little when there is no action,” said Kevin McLaughlin, a Cornyn spokesman.
But Obama’s trip to the Texas border to renew his commitment to immigration reform comes after three weeks of White House gatherings to get input from mayors, lawmakers and the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.
“I’m hoping the president can get more people thinking about it – the business community and Republicans – and convince them that the time is now. There should not be any political posturing,” said Rep. Charlie Gonzalez, D-San Antonio, Congressional Hispanic Caucus chairman.
Immigration advocates say the president has laid the groundwork for reform legislation, which would lead to more secure borders.
“We need to address the real threats of cash of drugs of guns that are smuggled and moved across our border that cause harm to our communities, not the imaginary threats of landscapers and nannies,” said Ali Noorani with the National Immigration Forum, a pro-immigration advocacy group.
Obama administration officials claim the U.S.-Mexico border is more secure than at any time in history, despite the raging war being waged by narcotics cartels just across the Rio Grande.
The Border Patrol has increased to 20,700 agents, more than double the number of agents in 2004, according to the Department of Homeland Security.
Illegal immigration has dropped due to increased enforcement and the economy, Obama administration officials claim.
The number of illegal immigrants in the country is estimated at 11 million by the Pew Hispanic Center, using U.S. Census data. That is down from an estimated 12 million in 2007.
There are roughly 1.6 million illegal immigrants in Texas, about 6.5 percent of the state’s population. Some 1 million illegal immigrants are in the state’s workforce, according to the Pew Hispanic Center.
Border Patrol is intercepting between 70 percent and 90 percent of illegal crossers on the Southwest border, said William Moore with the Texas Border Coalition, which represents cities and countries along the Rio Grande from Brownsville to El Paso.
“The strategy that the administration is put into place between the ports of entry is working,” Moore said.
The Texas Border Coalition is asking Congress and the administration to shift resources to upgrade border land ports to better screen and confiscate contraband without hampering trade between the United States and Mexico.
“Those land ports of entry are the doorways through which nearly all of the drug cartels’ product enters the United States,” Moore said.
3 Comments | Airforce, Amero - Islamic war, Aristocracy, Army, assembly, ATF, Black leaders/ Mental Plantations/ NAACP/ Jesse Jackson/ Al Sharpton, book bomb, Burqa / Niqab, car, communist, communist / socialist / liberal / democrat, corruption, democrat, Dereliction of Duty, Egypt, ELITE, environmentalists, FACEBOOK, Fascist, Flight 93, Memorials, Twin Towers, World Trade Center, Ft Hood, Fourteenth Amendment, Globalists, green, green peace, Greenies, gun, illegals, Iran, Islamification, Islamists, Lebanon, Libel, Liberal, Maoist, Marxist, Marxist-Leninist, Mexico and the Border war, Military, mortars, Napolitano, Navy, Pakistan, Palestine, Political corectness, political correctness, Politically Correct, Progressive, propaganda, propaganda, Republican, RINO, Sedition, Social media, socialist, Terrorist, terrorist or pirate, Treason, Turkey, twin towers, Tyranny, unconstitutional government policy, useful idiots, voter fraud, Weapons, welfare | Tagged: Barack Obama, Congressional Hispanic Caucus, Family of Barack Obama, John Cornyn, Mexico – United States border, National Immigration Forum, Republican, Republicans, Texas Border Coalition | Permalink
Posted by txlady706
Osama bin Laden – Blackout during the killing. Was the reason for the killing because Osama knew too much and was about to come out from hiding?May 5, 2011
Why the secrecy?
Why the confusion?
The truth is not confusing.
So, what is the truth here?
Was Osama looking to come out of the “closet?”
Was the tenth anniversary of the TWIN TOWERS collapse going to bring a new revelation from the ME? Was Osama going to deliver yet another blow?
Osama bin Laden dead: Blackout during raid on bin Laden compound
The head of the CIA admitted yesterday that there was no live video footage of the raid on Osama bin Laden’s compound as further doubts emerged about the US version of events.
Leon Panetta, director of the CIA, revealed there was a 25 minute blackout during which the live feed from cameras mounted on the helmets of the US special forces was cut off.
A photograph released by the White House appeared to show the President and his aides in the situation room watching the action as it unfolded. In fact they had little knowledge of what was happening in the compound.
In an interview with PBS, Mr Panetta said: “Once those teams went into the compound I can tell you that there was a time period of almost 20 or 25 minutes where we really didn’t know just exactly what was going on. And there were some very tense moments as we were waiting for information.
“We had some observation of the approach there, but we did not have direct flow of information as to the actual conduct of the operation itself as they were going through the compound.”
Mr Panetta also told the network that the US Navy Seals made the final decision to kill bin Laden rather than the president.
He said: “The authority here was to kill bin Laden. And obviously, under the rules of engagement, if he had in fact thrown up his hands, surrendered and didn’t appear to be representing any kind of threat, then they were to capture him. But they had full authority to kill him.
“To be frank, I don’t think he had a lot of time to say anything. It was a firefight going up that compound. And by the time they got to the third floor and found bin Laden, I think it – this was all split-second action on the part of the Seals.”
The President only knew the mission was successful after the Navy Seals commander heard the word “Geronimo” on the radio, a code word from commandos reporting that they had killed bin Laden.
The absence of footage of the raid has led to conflicting reports about what happened in the compound. According to Pakistani authorities one of bin Laden’s daughter’s, who was present during the raid, claimed that her father was captured alive before he was killed.
There was also growing doubt about the US claims that Pakistan’s intelligence agencies involved in the raid.
Lieutenant General Asad Durrani, former head of the ISI, Pakistan’s intelligence service, said it was “inconceivable” that his government was unaware of the US raid on Osama bin Laden’s compound.
He claimed his country was forced to deny any knowledge of the raid to avoid a domestic backlash. The ISI’s official line has been that bin Laden’s compound had “slipped off our radar” after it raided the building in 2003 while hunting for another senior al-Qaeda operative.The agency claims it was unaware that bin Laden was hiding there.
Lieutenant General Durrani, however, said that the denial was a “political” maneuver by the intelligence services to avoid claims that they were working too closely with the US.
He said: “It is more likely that they did know [about the raid]. It is not conceivable that it was done without the involvement of Pakistani security forces at some stage. They were involved and they were told they were in position.
“The army chief was in his office, the cordons had been thrown around that particular place. The Pakistani helicopters were also in the air so that indicates that it was involved.
“[There are] political implications back home. If you say that you are involved there is a large, vocal faction of Pakistani society that will get very upset because we are carrying out repeatedly these operations with the Americans.”
4 Comments | afghanistan, Airforce, Amero - Islamic war, Army, assembly, At the white house, ATF, Burqa / Niqab, communist, communist / socialist / liberal / democrat, corruption, democrat, Dereliction of Duty, environmentalists, Fascist, First Amendment and Freedom of speech foreign and domestic, Flight 93, Memorials, Twin Towers, World Trade Center, Ft Hood, gathering, Globalists, green, green peace, Greenies, Islamification, Islamists, Libel, Liberal, Main Stream Media, Maoist, Marxist, Marxist-Leninist, meeting, meeting, Middle East countries, Military, Mosque, Napolitano, Navy, NEW WORLD ORDER, Obama - the Muslim, Pakistan, Political corectness, political correctness, Politically Correct, Progressive, propaganda, propaganda, Republican, RINO, sick, Social media, socialist, speaking against ISLAM or Muslims or Mohammed, Taqiyah lie, taqiyya, takiyah, takiyya, takiya, Temple, Terrorist, Town Hall, townhall, townhall, Treason, Tyranny, UN general assembly, unconstitutional government policy, useful idiots, voter fraud, Weapons, welfare, Women and Children used as FODDER by MUSLIMS | Tagged: Al-Qaeda, Barack Obama, Leon Panetta, Osama BinLaden, Pakistan, United States, United States Navy SEALs, White House | Permalink
Posted by txlady706