Connecticut – Vernon – Hijab Jihad, Grievance Jihad, Litigation Jihad – Burqa’s are offensive and pose a safety risk.

This womans argument is that the HIJAB is worn for “PRIDE” and NOT for religion.

She says NOTHING about why the covering is “necessary”

It’s not to give reverence to G-d.  The Q’RAN says that it’s done because MEN have no ability to behave with respect.  It teaches men that WOMEN are NOT to be respected.  They are after all 1/4th of a MAN.

Ban the Burqa and the HIJAB

Ban Shariah!

Hijab Jihad, Grievance Jihad, Litigation Jihad

by SHEIKYERMAMI on NOVEMBER 24, 2010

“Revert” was asked to remove hijab at skating rink, sez she was “shocked”- so the Islamic grievance machine goes in top gear. Of course, if she had caused an accident (like here) she and her backers would have sued as well. Either which way we lose. Wanna bet that the skating ring backs off once the “racist-bigot-Islamophobic” accusations fly?

Woman Says Vernon Skating Rink’s Policy Discriminates Against Muslims

VERNON, Conn. (AP) — A Connecticut woman says a roller rink’s request that she either remove or cover her traditional Muslim head scarf was discriminatory.

“We couldn’t enter the facility because we had our scarves on,” said Rodriguez-Colon, who has worn the scarf, or hijab, for 16 years.

(Nothing “traditional” to see here. Just in-your-face Islamic supremacy. Islam tops your kafir laws, back off, infidel!)

Vodpod videos no longer available.
Hijab Jihad, Grievance Jihad, Litigation Jihad, posted with vodpod

Marisol Rodriguez-Colon of Windsor tells WTIC-TV that she and her sister-in-law went to the Ron-A-Roll indoor rink in Vernon on Sunday for her niece’s birthday party. She says inside, a woman who identified herself as a manager, told them they would have to either remove their hijabs or wear helmets. She was told the rink has a policy prohibiting headwear.

Rodriguez-Colon said removing her scarf was “not an option,” and they left.

Rink management issued a statement reiterating the no headwear policy and saying helmets are offered for safety purposes.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations says it has filed a complaint with the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities.

via – http://sheikyermami.com/2010/11/24/hijab-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-314007

 

My comment:

The policy is clear.If I walked in there with a veil or something that covers my ears, I would have been told to leave too.I think that WE should tell facilities that WE are offended by them and their “PRIDE”, which ofter over rides OUR FREEDOM or  safety in this case.  If the next time you go somewhere and there is a freak with a sack over her (or his head) leave and tell the facility that they are putting you in danger.  You will never know if you walk in to a Mall and some burqa wearing b!tch has explosives under her crap.  And no one would be able to ID the IT wearing the sack, because they are covered even the eyes sometimes.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: