It seems that BLACK WOMEN are especially exempt from scrutiny and JAIL.
Even when caught RED handed, white supervisor are so scared to be criticized as racists by the BLACKS who commit the crime, that they ALLOW for LAWS to be broken and NOT EVEN mentioned.
Political Correctness and Affirmative action IS discrimination. John Stossel’s bake sale proves that :
Discrimination, political correctness, affirmative action and Cupcakes – John Stosel’s affirmative action BAKE SALE
Yet, these tools are now WEAPONS. Blacks and women have obtained positions of SCRUTINY and yet due to their gender and color become ABOVE the LAW. The FEAR is what they smell. Like scavengers in the wild, the smell of FEAR attracts the vermin. I’m not calling BLACKS or WOMEN vermin, what I AM saying is that the vermin in those genders or colors seek out these situations and then USE the TOOLS of POLITICAL CORRECTNESS (weapons) to abuse the positions that they have garnered with those tools and NO one says anything about it, because if they do, then THEY are attacked as racists or sexists. They knew that they wouldn’t be examined, because they knew that the FEAR FACTOR would be there.
Maxine Waters and Eddie Bernice Johnson are 2 recent examples of BLACK WOMAN who believe that they are ENTITLED to be above the LAW. These woman are CRIMINALS and have USED their positions
Another Maxine Waters Scandal
As a congressional ethics panel prepares to try Maxine Waters for steering federal funds to her husband’s failing bank, a newspaper reports that the veteran Californialawmaker is embroiled in a separate corruption scandal involving her beloved hubby.
Citing federal records, the story says that a powerful lobbyist paid Waters’ banker husband (Sidney Williams) $15,000 in “consulting fees” as she co-sponsored a law aimed at saving a business that was among the lobbyist’s top clients. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) had determined that the real estate finance firm and others like it were “scams” and the congresswoman’s measure would have overturned a federal ban that would have allowed the shady enterprises to keep raking in lucrative profits.
For years the firms acted as a middleman to help sellers finance down payments so that low-income buyers could qualify for mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). The lobbyist who paid Waters’ husband represented the nation’s largest such middleman (Sacrament-based Nehemiah Corp.), which stood to lose hundreds of millions of dollars if the ban wasn’t reversed by friendly lawmakers like Waters.
Implemented in 2008, the federal ban was never overturned but not for lack of effort on Waters’ part. The ten-term congresswoman sponsored legislation three times to stop the ban or repeal it once it became law. She claims she did it because the program allowed hundreds of thousands of low-income families to become homeowners.
News of this latest scandal comes as the House Ethics Committee prepares to try Waters for using her influence to steer $12 million in federal bailout funds to a failing bank (that subsequently got shut down by the government) in which she and her board member husband held shares.
A few months ago the congresswoman got in trouble again for skirting federal elections rules with a crooked fundraising gimmick that allows her to receive unlimited amounts of donations from certain contributors. Instead of raising most of her campaign funds from individuals and political action committees, Waters sells her endorsement to other politicians and political causes for as much as $45,000 a pop, allowing her to rake in hundreds of thousands of dollars in short periods of time.
November 3rd, 2010
This woman has been beyond corrupt
She is down right CRIMMINAL
Misappropriation of funds would be NOTHING
Texas – Dallas – Eddie Johnson, a nine-term Democrat -”a veteran Texas lawmaker has illegally awarded thousands of dollars in college scholarships to relatives and the children of a top aide even though anti-nepotism rules expressly forbid it.”
She has not even apologized. She had the nerve to run for office again?
Are these people stupid?
Seriously. She just stole money from the tax payers and they have the nerve to RE -elect her? This is audacious. How dare she?
I live in Texas.
If I lived there I would be moving very quickly.
This really makes NO sense. It’s a slap in the face of Justice.
Then, there is the LEGAL VOTER FRAUD passed by policy- and although it says NY in the title, there are Texas cities that PRACTICE the SAME voter fraud legally:
New York – Voter Fraud – Whites and Blacks are now 1/6th of a person – on the instructions of a federal judge and the U.S. Department of Justice as part of a new election system crafted to help boost Hispanic representation.
I guarantee that this scholarship scandal is chump change to her and this is why she has not backed down. I bet that this is only the very surface of what lies in her murky depths.
She should be brought up on charges of LARCENY. If I had stolen that much money, I would be in jail. What makes HER above the law? Just because she is a “government official?” Places like cuba and Russia had these types. Do we want this to go unchecked?
Rep. Johnson Wins Re-election:
Updated 9:15 AM CDT, Wed, Nov 3, 2010
Nine-term Democratic Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson was re-elected to the 30th Congressional District, despite a scholarship scandal that had threatened to unseat her.
Johnson, who’d kept a low profile recently, arrived in good spirits to greet a crowd of supporters at the American Airlines Center on Election Night. She made no mention of her GOP opponent Stephen Broden, or of that scholarship scandal in which gave Congressional Black Caucusscholarships — intended for qualified students in her district — to ineligible relatives and friends.
Broden said he was proud to have offered voters some alternatives “to what has been the pattern.”
“I think she’s probably run a race that has been very successful for her, ” Broden said of Johnson. “She understands the district, she’s been there for 18 years, she knows how to rally her troops.”
Broden experienced controversy of his own in the days leading up to Election Day, after he made statements about violent revolution during an interview. On Election Night, after it was clear Johnson woud win, Broden resisted discussion of whether his comments turned some voters away.
“To what extent it did, I can’t measure that,” Broden said.