Ninth Circuit Court – UNCONSTITUTIONAL and TREASONOUS Ruling allowing 11 Foreign government to sue Arizona

Now that the elections are over, it’s time to look at what OUR Government has allowed under this CRIMINAL, Barack Hussein Obama.

Treason is the name of the game.

This is our Court ALLOWING foreign entities to have a say in how our STATE govern.

Would any other country, that is not Suicidal allow this?

When did AMERICA decide to KILL itself?

Why are Americans so docile?  Sovereignty is at stake.

This should never have been allowed.  This is an unconstitutional agenda of this court and it should be dismantled.  This court has become ROGUE!

section 4 of the US Constitution:

Section 4
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican
Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on
Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature
cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.




Jan Brewer gives a speech. | AP Photo

Jan Brewer is asking a federal court to disallow foreign governments from joining the federal lawsuit. | AP Photo Read more



Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer slams ‘foreign interference’ in immigration lawsuit:

By SCOTT WONG | 10/6/10 9:57 AM EDT Updated: 10/6/10 7:21 PM EDT


In a new twist in the fight over Arizona’s immigration law, Republican Gov. Jan Brewer on Tuesday asked a federal court to disallow foreign governments from joining the U.S. Department of Justice lawsuit to overturn the law.

The move comes in response to a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling issued Monday, allowing nearly a dozen Latin American countries — Mexico, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru and Chile — to submit friend-of-the-court briefs in Justice’s challenge to SB 1070, which Brewer signed into law in April and is considered one of the nation’s toughest immigration-enforcement measures.


“As do many citizens, I find it incredibly offensive that these foreign governments are using our court system to meddle in a domestic legal dispute and to oppose the rule of law,” the Republican governor said in a statement shortly after the state’s motion was filed Tuesday evening.

“What’s even more offensive is that this effort has been supported by the U.S. Department of Justice. American sovereignty begins in the U.S. Constitution and at the border,” she added. “I am confident the 9th Circuit will do the right thing and recognize foreign interference in U.S. legal proceedings and allow the State of Arizona to respond to their brief.”

Brewer and her supporters have said the state law is necessary because the federal government has failed to protect the border and enforce immigration laws. But the Justice Department — with strong backing from President Barack Obama — sued to block the Arizona law on constitutional grounds.

Responding to the suit, a federal judge in July put some of the most contested parts of the law on hold, including a provision that requires police officers to check the immigration status of individuals they stop for other offenses if there is “reasonable suspicion” they are in the country illegally.

Brewer, who has vowed to take the case to the Supreme Court, appealed the decision to the 9th Circuit Court, which will begin hearing arguments in San Francisco on Nov. 1, one day before the midterm elections.

The Arizona law is a top political issue nationally. Cities from San Francisco and Seattle to Baltimore have joined a friend of the court brief opposing the Arizona law, while 11 states — including Texas, Florida and Nebraska — filed an amicus brief backing the law.

In July, more than 80 Republican members of Congress signed their names to an amicus brief filed by the conservative Immigration Reform Caucus. They included Sens. Jim DeMint of South Carolina, David Vitter of Louisiana and John Barrasso of Wyoming, and Reps. Lamar Smith of Texas, Steve King of Iowa and Trent Franks of Arizona.

Brewer’s motion should resonate among conservative legal scholars worried about giving foreign legal systems a voice in American jurisprudence. These concerns are a reaction to a school of legal thought arguing that American judges should look to foreign laws and courts for assistance in interpreting the U.S. Constitution, particularly in regard to basic human rights issues. Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy is arguably the leading spokesperson for this approach, as noted in a 2005 New Yorker profile.

The state of Arizona’s motion could also strike a chord with those on the right who are convinced that President Barack Obama (and Bill Clinton before him) want to make U.S. laws subordinate to international courts, particularly the International Criminal Court in The Hague. Under Clinton, the United States signed a treaty to join the court weeks before leaving office in January 2001, though the Senate never ratified his action. Months later, President George W. Bush pulled the United States out of the treaty, saying he worried foreign governments would try to prosecute U.S. troops for alleged war crimes.

Read more:



4 Responses to Ninth Circuit Court – UNCONSTITUTIONAL and TREASONOUS Ruling allowing 11 Foreign government to sue Arizona

  1. Montana says:

    “Prop. 200”, “House Bill 2013″ and “SB1070″

    0 = Arizona
    3 = USA/ Our Constitution/ We the People of the United States

    We are a country that is ruled by the Constitution (with all Amendments), and the Declaration of Independence, not by the majority of the day. When the uneducated do not know the principles in these documents, therein lays the problem in losing, so no one should be surprised when the dullards lose in court after being smartly challenged.

    Last month of October 2010, our Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned Arizona’s requirement that people show proof of citizenship to register to vote or the 2004, “Prop. 200”. In the month of July 2010, our U.S. Federal courts have found the so called State of Arizona hate filled legislation namely “House Bill 2013″ and “SB1070″ Un-constitution (So much for the intellect of Jan Brewer, “Did you read the bills you signed?”). But we all know that they will go crying to the Supreme Court of the United States, please, please, please go. We will fight you in Arizona, any other state, and yes in Washington DC. We will not tire, we will not be silent and we will persevere, I promise you.

    In my opinion the Republican Party has been taken over the most extreme of clans; the Baggers, Birthers and Blowhards (people who love to push their beliefs and hate on others while trying to take away the rights of those they just hate) and that’s who they need to extract from their party if they real want to win in November. Good Luck, because as they said in WACO, “We Ain’t Coming Out”.

    I know the proponents of this law say that the majority approves of these laws, but the majority is not always right. Would women or non-whites have the vote if we listen to the majority of the day, would the non-whites have equal rights (and equal access to churches, housing, restaurants, hotels, retail stores, schools, colleges and yes water fountains) if we listen to the majority of the day? We all know the answer, a resounding, NO! You were all wrong then and you are wrong now!

    I hope that every American, regardless of where he lives, will stop and examine his conscience about this and other related incidents. This Nation was founded by men of many nations and backgrounds. It was founded on the principle that all men are created equal, and that the rights of every man are diminished when the rights of one man are threatened. All of us ought to have the right to be treated as he would wish to be treated, as one would wish his children to be treated, but this is not the case.

    Today we are committed to a worldwide struggle to promote and protect the rights of all who wish to be free. In a time of domestic crisis men of good will and generosity should be able to unite regardless of party or politics and do what is right, not what is just popular with the majority. Some men comprehend discrimination by never have experiencing it in their lives, but the majority will only understand after it happens to them.

  2. txlady706 says:

    Have you read the Constitution?
    Do you know the articles?
    This country was not founded to be governed by a central government.
    This country was founded for the EXACT opposite reason. The STATES govern themselves and the ONLY function of the Federal ARCH is the protection of the Sovereignty of the US. – And even then – the STATES, each, on their own, have a duty to protect their CITIZENS –
    “Section 10 – Powers prohibited of States

    No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

    No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it’s inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.

    No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War,

    ************unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.”******************

    The STATE of Arizona has every right to defend herself from the invasion of foreigners coming across her border FOR ANY REASON!

    There is more. But really. You make no VALID or FACTUAL case for yourself.

    By the way – READ this – OBAMA has never show proof of his native birth in Hawaii:
    “Section 4 – Disqualification

    The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
    Furthermore, the policies that he has passed and the CZARS overreaching their authorities by his direction, these things circumventing the Constitution are considered TREASON! Obama’s “circumventing the Constitution” means that he is creating the COLLAPSE of the CONSTITUTION. His policies created ANOTHER form of Government. This NEW government, resembles that of Communist China– READ CHINA’s Constitution, here —->
    Socialism becomes Communism very quickly. Communism is a OLIGARCHY of DICTATORS. The OLIGARCHY can’t survive long, it naturally yields a Dictatorship, a TYRANNY.
    This is not AMERICA. Her people and laws have been subverted.
    Obama should be IMPEACHED.
    OBAMA’s cabinet should be investigated for each category of TREASON that the Constitution refers to.
    The Democrats and the Republicans have been hijacked. The invaders are the Communists and Globalists, which have sabotaged the mechanism of our government.
    Montana, please, take your COMMUNIST rhetoric and examine it for what it is. YOU can’t control people. The TYRANT is the one who thinks he can.
    I don’t want anyone LORDING over ME.
    Even if it is a COMPASSIONATE TYRANNY.

  3. Montana says:

    Please, boring,snore, snore….Win in a US Court not just in your own mind, then and only then will people take you seriously

  4. txlady706 says:

    An exchange of ideas is not boring. If it was, then you would not partake in it. I am not an attorney, so I doubt that anyone would want to hear me in court. I am not rich, so I can’t afford to fight for OUR rights in court on my own. I would like to. It’s really quite sad that THAT is unrealistic now days. It’s very telling as to how far we have drifted from THE PEOPLE actually governing instead of the OLIGARCHY we know as the GOVERNMENT.
    So, argument is not boring and it’s disingenuous for you to say that. Maybe you mean that I am boring. Maybe thats true. But I AM thoughtful and truthful.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: