The Fourteenth Amendment – miss represented and lied about. The American government has been lying to the Citizens of the US of America regarding illegal anchor babies.

The Fourteenth amendment is a huge controversy.

The controversy revolves around two things: illegal aliens and diplomats.

The fact is that the American public has been lying to the people about this Amendment.

The reason why this amendment was initially ratified is because of slavery and foreigners (that gained legal entry, but were not yet provided citizenship).  One has to take in to account that there were no such things as “GREEN CARDS” back then.  There were also no such things as ILLEGAL ALIENS with any status.  They were illegal and expelled and there were no “labels” for them.

The reason for the clarification in the Constitution was to DEFINE who is LEGALLY entitled to citizenship.

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States …”

The highlighted in red is what has been mis represented ON PURPOSE.

“A citizen of the United States is held by the courts to be a person who was born within the limits of the United States and subject to their laws” Sen. Jacob Howard, R-Mich and author of the citizenship clause.

The bullets below were not OR, they connote AND.

  • is born in the United States
  • and
  • of parents who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of a foreign power
  • and
  • whose parents have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States
  • and
  • whose parents are there carrying on business and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity of the foreign power to which they are subject

The one I highlighted in blue is the most substantial.

The parents can’t have allegiance to another nation.

United States v. Wong Kim Ark:

In the case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), the Supreme Court ruled that a person who

  • is born in the United States
  • of parents who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of a foreign power
  • whose parents have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States
  • whose parents are there carrying on business and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity of the foreign power to which they are subject

becomes, at the time of his birth, a citizen of the United States by virtue of the first clause of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. Although any language inWong Kim Ark that suggests the Court’s opinion and rationale could be expanded to include the children of illegal immigrants would be mere dicta as Wong’s parents were in the country legally.[29] Children born to foreign diplomats or, hypothetically, to hostile enemy forces or born on U.S. territory while it is under the control of a foreign power, are not considered subject to U.S. jurisdiction and therefore are not citizens at birth.[30] The distinction between “legal” and “illegal” immigrants was not clear at the time of the decision of Wong Kim Ark.[31]

The Supreme Court has never explicitly ruled on whether children born in the United States to illegal immigrant parents are entitled to birthright citizenship via the 14th Amendment,[32] although it has generally been assumed that they are.[29] When accorded automatic birthright citizenship based on birth on American soil, a newborn’s status is generally unaffected by the legal status or citizenship of that individual’s mother or father.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthright_citizenship_in_the_United_States_of_America

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: