UK – Banning of individuals for “hate speech” from a country by it’s government is not doled out evenly. Savage banned while Che’s Daughter INVITED. “Hate speech” arbitrarily labeled and it’s consequences are LEGAL

An individual can’t fight a government.  It’s not fair.

The UK TOLERATES all sort of “hate speech,” but when the government chooses to penalize people for it, then WHO determines what is HATE Speech?

The UK has shown poor judgment.  Their bias is evident in this EXTREME case of a government using it’s body to malign someone reputation and to impede his mobility.

The government doesn’t like the judgments that Michael Savage casts, not the actual words he speaks.  Yet this government is OK with Muslims saying that they will kill Jews and Christians.  They are OK with that?  They invite people who say the things that the IRAN president has said.  Michael Savage has never advised mass murder, yet he is being banned.  An individual.  Why is HE so IMPORTANT?

Funny how a MAN who screams of FREEDOM and LIBERTY is banned from a country that the world community looks to for their moral compass.

The UK is a MONARCHY in more ways than one.  The Queens all for the NEW WORLD ORDER.  Just look at the Bilderberg LIST

GBR Agius, Marcus Chairman, Barclays Bank PLC
GBR Kerr, John Member, House of Lords; Deputy Chairman, Royal Dutch Shell plc.
GBR Micklethwait, John Editor-in-Chief, The Economist
GBR Oldham, John National Clinical Lead for Quality and Productivity
GBR Taylor, J. Martin Chairman, Syngenta International AG
GBR Williams, Shirley Member, House of Lords
GBR Bredow, Vendeline von Business Correspondent, The Economist
GBR Wooldridge, Adrian D. Business Correspondent, The Economist

Bilderberg Wants Americans Disarmed And Dependent On Government
Alex Jones: Bilderberg Is Running Scared
Bilderberg Agenda Revealed: Globalists In Crisis, Supportive Of Attack On Iran
Bill Gates To Attend 2010 Bilderberg Conference
Bilderberg See People With Income As “A Threat” To Their Agenda
Large Protests, Extensive Media Coverage Signifies Awakening To Bilderberg Agenda
Bilderberg 2010: Globalists Panic Over Euro Collapse
Bilderberg: The Open Conspiracy
Bilderberg To Prolong Global Financial Recession For Another Year

Here’s another gem from the United Kingdom:

England- BP confirmed today that it had lobbied the British government in late 2007 over a prisoner transfer agreement with Libya because it was concerned a slow resolution of it would affect an offshore drilling deal with Libya

Listen to Michael Savages Eloquent and well thought out response:


Britain Bans Michael Savage (Again), Welcomes Che’s Daughter:

Posted by Humberto Fontova Jul 13th 2010 at 9:33 am in New Media

General Franco is still dead and after a year of legal wrangling popular radio-host Michael Savage is still banned (in Britain.) The new Conservative British government of Prime Minister David Cameron is sticking by former Labor Home Secretary Jacqui Smith’s decision from May of last year. “Coming to the U.K. is a privilege,” explained the Home Secretary at the time, “and I refuse to extend that privilege to individuals who abuse our standards and values andwho foster extremist views as I want them to know that they are not welcome here. Mr. Savage engages in unacceptable behavior by seeking to provoke others to serious criminal acts and fostering hatred.”

michael_savage3The new British government informed Mr. Savage his exclusion stands because of “the absence of clear, convincing and public evidence that he has repudiated his previous statements.”

Instead of the false contrition, groveling and confessions that Stalin, Mao and Che Guevara demanded from the subjects they accused of “thought crimes,” (before murdering them) Michael Savage sought to repudiate his listing alongside terrorists and Nazis by resorting to the tenets of Western jurisprudence and presenting evidence to the contrary.

“His bad” some might quip regarding the strategy. In today’s Britain what’s left of the Magna Carta only work s in favor of actual Islamic terrorists.

One month after insulting and banning Michael Savage last summer, Britain opened her arms to Che Guevara’s daughter, Aleida. The occasion was a celebration in London titled Cuba50, billed as “the biggest European celebration in the 50th anniversary year of the Cuban Revolution.  “In London’s expansive Barbican Centre, Britain threw the continent’s biggest party commemorating fifty years of Castro’s Stalinist regime, which jailed political prisoners at a higher rate than Stalin’s, murdered political prisoners at a higher rate than pre-war Hitler’s, and came closest of anyone to plunging the world into nuclear war.

Che’s daughter was there to promote, in her own words: “my father’s ideals, his concerns, and his ambitions. I believe that my father is a banner to the world. If we could only follow his example, the world would be a much more beautiful place.”

Fine. Let’s have a look at Aleida’s father’s “ambitions,” keeping in mind that what got Michael Savage banned was his purported “fostering of extremist views” and his “hate speech.”

Hatred as the central element of our struggle!” raved Ernesto ‘Che’ Guevara in his 1966 Message to the Tricontinental Conference in Havana. “Hatred that is intransigent…hatred so violent that it propels a human being beyond his natural limitations, making him violent and cold- blooded killing machine…We reject any peaceful approach. Violence is inevitable. To establish Socialism rivers of blood must flow… The imperialist enemy must feel like a hunted animal wherever he moves. Thus we’ll destroy him! These hyenas (Americans) are fit only for extermination. We must keep our hatred alive and fan it to paroxysm! The victory of Socialism is well worth millions of atomic victims!”


No rational person would require much elasticity of definition to classify Aleida’s father’s—this “banner to the world!”—speech. And Aleida Guevara, in an interview with the Guardian during the visit, boasted of her fervent “fostering” of her father’s views.  “I want to be like Che and fight until final victory, then you feel elated! It is preferable to sink in the sea than to betray the glory that once lived!”

“Gay-bashing” seems to figure big in Britain’s definition of hate speech. But apparently when this bashing comes in the literal form, involving Soviet gun-butts and bayonets bashing a gay’s head until he dies from massive cerebral trauma, it fails to fall under her definition of “Hate Speech.”

The British government gives no indication that in the process of “promoting her fathers’ ideals” Aleida Guevara presented the slightest offense to Britain’s “standards and values.”

Listen to Michael Savages Eloquent and well thought out response:


$25, $50, $100 or even more
to help me fight for Free Speech.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: