Obama should not be president – Israel is thrown under the bus by POTUS, AND the US is also case asunder by proxy

May 21, 2011
Jonathan Schanzer: Hamas & Fatah, posted with vodpod

Jonathan Schanzer of the Jewish Policy Institute addressed the Center for Security Policy’s National Security Group on Capitol Hill. He is the author of Hamas vs. Fatah.

Obama’s Abandonment of America

Posted by Caroline Glick on May 20th, 2011 and filed under Daily MailerFrontPage.

Reprinted from carolineglick.com.

I was out sick yesterday so I was unable to write today’s column for theJerusalem Post. I did manage to watch President Obama’s speech on the Middle East yesterday evening. And I didn’t want to wait until next week to discuss it. After all, who knows what he’ll do by Tuesday?

Before we get into what the speech means for Israel, it is important to consider what it means for America.

Quite simply, Obama’s speech represents the effective renunciation of the US’s right to have and to pursue national interests. Consequently, his speech imperils the real interests that the US has in the region – first and foremost, the US’s interest in securing its national security.

Obama’s renunciation of the US national interests unfolded as follows:

First, Obama mentioned a number of core US interests in the region. In his view these are: “Countering terrorism and stopping the spread of nuclear weapons; securing the free flow of commerce, and safe-guarding the security of the region; standing up for Israel’s security and pursuing Arab-Israeli peace.”

Then he said, “Yet we must acknowledge that a strategy based solely upon the narrow pursuit of these interests will not fill an empty stomach or allow someone to speak their mind.”

While this is true enough, Obama went on to say that the Arabs have good reason to hate the US and that it is up to the US to put its national interests aside in the interest of making them like America. As he put it, “a failure to change our approach threatens a deepening spiral of division between the United States and Muslim communities.”

And you know what that means. If the US doesn’t end the “spiral of division,” (sounds sort of like “spiral of violence” doesn’t it?), then the Muslims will come after America. So the US better straighten up and fly right.

And how does it do that? Well, by courting the Muslim Brotherhood which spawned Al Qaeda, Hamas, Jamma Islamiya and a number of other terror groups and is allies with Hezbollah.

How do we know this is Obama’s plan? Because right after he said that the US needs to end the “spiral of division,” he recalled his speech in Egypt in June 2009 when he spoke at the Brotherhood controlled Al Azhar University and made sure that Brotherhood members were in the audience in a direct diplomatic assault on US ally Hosni Mubarak.

And of course, intimations of Obama’s plan to woo and appease the jihadists appear throughout the speech. For instance:

“There will be times when our short term interests do not align perfectly with our long term vision of the region.”

So US short term interests, like for instance preventing terrorist attacks against itself or its interests, will have to be sacrificed for the greater good of bringing the Muslim Brotherhood to power in democratic elections.

And he also said that the US will “support the governments that will be elected later this year” in Egypt and Tunisia. But why would the US support governments controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood? They are poised to control the elected government in Egypt and are the ticket to beat in Tunisia as well.

Then there is the way Obama abandoned US allies Yemen and Bahrain in order to show the US’s lack of hypocrisy. As he presented it, the US will not demand from its enemies Syria and Iran that which it doesn’t demand from its friends.

While this sounds fair, it is anything but fair. The fact is that if you don’t distinguish between your allies and your enemies then you betray your allies and side with your enemies. Bahrain and Yemen need US support to survive. Iran and Syria do not. So when he removes US support from the former, his action redounds to the direct benefit of the latter.

P Photo/US Navy, Kurt Eischen The USS New Orleans makes its way down the Mississippi River on March 5, 2007. The U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet says two of its vessels -- a submarine, the USS Hartford and an amphibious ship, the USS New Orleans -- collided in the Strait of Hormuz between Iran and the Arabian peninsula early Friday.

Beyond his abandonment of Bahrain and Yemen, in claiming that the US mustn’t distinguish between its allies and its foes, Obama made clear that he has renounced the US’s right to have and pursue national interests. If you can’t favor your allies against your enemies then you cannot defend your national interests. And if you cannot defend your national interests then you renounce your right to have them.

As for Iran, in his speech, Obama effectively abandoned the pursuit of the US’s core interest of preventing nuclear proliferation. All he had to say about Iran’s openly genocidal nuclear program is, “Our opposition to Iran’s intolerance – as well as its illicit nuclear program, and its sponsorship of terror – is well known.”

Well so is my opposition to all of that, and so is yours. But unlike us, Obama is supposed to do something about it. And by putting the gravest threat the US presently faces from the Middle East in the passive voice, he made clear that actually, the US isn’t going to do anything about it.

May 11, 2011

Palestinian State in September? Hamas Says No Way

http://www.viciousbabushka.com/2011/05/palestinian-state-in-september-hamas-says-no-way.html

Al-zahar

Palestinian Hamas leader Mahmoud Zahar walks on an Israeli flag while taking part in a rally to mark the upcoming 23rd anniversary since the group's foundation, in Gaza city, Thursday, Dec. 9, 2010. The arabic text reads: "For sure will be destroyed. Israel". AP Photo.

Gaza rulers say September most likely too soon to declare Palestinian independence, as too many questions pertaining to state’s viability remain unanswered

Senior Hamas official Mahmoud al-Zahar said Wednesday that the Islamist movement was somewhat skeptical as to the viability of Fatah’s September-bound bid for statehood.

Speaking with the Palestinian Ma’an News Agency, al-Zahar said that “all the talk of a Palestinian state is… an attempt to pacify us.”

He further wondered as to the nature of the Palestinian state, should it be declared in several months’ time: “Where is the land for this state? Are those living in the West Bank and Gaza to be its citizens? What will be the fate of the five million Palestinians in the diaspora? Are we to give up the right of return?”

He also said that anyone who thinks that a Palestinian state would be accepted by the international community without it recognizing Israel first, “does not understand the (political) landscape.”

Hamas, he said, is willing to accept a Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders, but will maintain its refusal to recognize Israel, since a formal recognition of Israel would “cancel the right of the next generations to liberate the lands.”

Read more at YNet.

Palestinians never miss an opportunity.

In short, every American who is concerned about the security of the United States should be livid. The US President just abandoned his responsibility to defend the country and its interests in the interest of coddling the US’s worst enemies.

AS FOR ISRAEL, in a way, Obama did Israel a favor by giving this speech. By abandoning even a semblance of friendliness, he has told us that we have nothing whatsoever to gain by trying to make him like us. Obama didn’t even say that he would oppose the Palestinians’ plan to get the UN Security Council to pass a resolution in support for Palestinian independence. All he said was that it is a dumb idea.

Obama sided with Hamas against Israel by acting as though its partnership with Fatah is just a little problem that has to be sorted out to reassure the paranoid Jews. Or as he put it, “the recent announcement of an agreement between Fatah and Hamas raises profound and legitimate questions for Israel.”

Hamas is a jihadist movement dedicated to the annihilation of the Jewish people, and the establishment of a global caliphate. It’s in their charter. And all Obama said of the movement that has now taken over the Palestinian Authority was, “Palestinian leaders will not achieve peace or prosperity if Hamas insists on a path of terror and rejection.”

Irrelevant and untrue.

It is irrelevant because obviously the Palestinians don’t want peace. That’s why they just formed a government dedicated to Israel’s destruction.

As for being untrue, Obama’s speech makes clear that they have no reason to fear a loss of prosperity. After all, by failing to mention that US law bars the US government from funding an entity which includes Hamas, he made clear that the US will continue to bankroll the Hamas-controlled Palestinian Authority. So too, the EU will continue to join the US in giving them billions for bombs and patronage jobs. The Palestinians have nothing to worry about. They will continue to be rewarded regardless of what they do.

Then of course there are all the hostile, hateful details of the speech:

He said Israel has to concede its right to defensible borders as a precondition for negotiations;

He didn’t say he opposes the Palestinian demand for open immigration of millions of foreign Arabs into Israel;

He again ignored Bush’s 2004 letter to Sharon opposing a return to the 1949 armistice lines, supporting the large settlements, defensible borders and opposing mass Arab immigration into Israel;

He said he was leaving Jerusalem out but actually brought it in by calling for an Israeli retreat to the 1949 lines;

He called for Israel to be cut in two when he called for the Palestinians state to be contiguous;

He called for Israel to withdraw from the Jordan Valley – without which it is powerless against invasion – by saying that the Palestinian State will have an international border with Jordan.

Conceptually and substantively, Obama abandoned the US alliance with Israel. The rest of his words – security arrangements, demilitarized Palestinian state and the rest of it – were nothing more than filler to please empty-headed liberal Jews in America so they can feel comfortable signing checks for him again.

Indeed, even his seemingly pro-Israel call for security arrangements in a final peace deal involved sticking it to Israel. Obama said, “The full and phased withdrawal of Israeli military forces should be coordinated with the assumption of Palestinian security responsibility in a sovereign, non-militarized state.”

What does that mean “with the assumption of Palestinian security responsibility?”

It means we have to assume everything will be terrific.

All of this means is that if Prime Minister Netanyahu was planning to be nice to Obama, and pretend that everything is terrific with the administration, he should just forget about it. He needn’t attack Obama. Let the Republicans do that.

But both in his speech to AIPAC and his address to Congress, he should very forthrightly tell the truth about the nature of the populist movements in the Middle East, the danger of a nuclear Iran, the Palestinians’ commitment to Israel’s destruction; the lie of the so-called peace process; the importance of standing by allies; and the critical importance of a strong Israel to US national security.

He has nothing to gain and everything to lose by playing by the rules that Obama is trying to set for him.

http://frontpagemag.com/2011/05/20/obamas-abandonment-of-america/


Obama should not be President – Obama is setting Israel up for a WAR and the same logic would lead to a WAR in the US – He is setting a DANGEROUS precedent

May 21, 2011

This President is dangerous to the US.  The logic that started the war in Libya has nothing to do with Gadhafi, per se.  It has to do with setting the stage.  This president is not a leader.  He IS an actor.  The stage is being prepared by others.  He is only the lead role at the moment.  And this is WHY he is dangerous.  Nothing is REAL.  It’s all staged.  No one that is a REAL player gets hurt, according to the globalists.

I’m convinced that there is a fracturing in the Globalists clique.  Some of them are Global Capitalists and others are Global Communists.  There is an ideological strife a foot. The reason I believe that is because there are leaks of information surfacing that would otherwise NOT be there.

Be that as it may, the other agents in play are the Muslims.  They are outmaneuvering the Globalists on some fronts and the Globalists are making hasty errors in judgement.  They are forced to move more quickly, but some have already made deals with the other side.  Those, I believe, are the Capitalists, because they have only one goal, money, but not money in that they have paper or stuff like that, but money in terms of true wealth and that is Control driven.  They have to get CONTROL of the commonly accepted currency, because in the end, that is their only truest commodity.

So, how does that correlate to Gadhafi and how does that set the stage for a war that the US be subjected to?

It’s the Logic.  The UN is the Global GUN.  The reason that Gadhafi was attacked is to begin to set the precedent and NO other reason.  The next casualty will be potentially Syria, in my opinion.  The following, and this may not occur until AFTER the election, is Israel.  And the reasoning is nice outlined below, in Gaffeney’s article.  However, I would take it a step farther.  The same situation is setting itself up here too, in the US.  The next casualty, may indeed be, the US.  Hezbollah and Hamas have set up shop in South America and Mexico.  They are taking over the cartels.  They got their FEET in the door by selling weapons and training the Cartels.  Now, they are tenured within those “armies.”  The same situation is setting itself up.  What difference is there in logic?  It is the same.  The Palestinian’s cry that they were removed from their land.  The Mexicans cry the same.  US children are being taught toward sedition and outright treason of their own country by “teachers” whose agenda is to overthrow the state that they teach.  Even the methods are the same between the Palestinians and what they are doing to Israel and what the “Mexican’s”  are doing to the US.   The similarities should not go unnoticed.  The fish ALWAYS stinks from the HEAD.

<thanks to Mandy for the Gaffney article.>

I would also like to mention that Obama sitting as the head of the UN security council is a direct violation of the nobility clause in Article 9 of the US CONSTITUTION.

The Senate Armed Services Committee should convene immediately to prevent Obama from using our people in his and the NWO’s war. The military should stand down.

The ATF who’s under the Homeland security, which the CIA is also under, is headed by a CZAR.  This agency is NOT steered by an elected official.  This is an appointment by the PRESIDENT.  These CZAR headed agencies have taken control of legitimate agencies and are run by executive fiat.  This is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.  How is it that they have been allowed these POWERS?  These agencies have seized control of America.  They overrule the Constitutional limitations of power.

Communist China may be bad, but America is going to be much worse, if this continues unchecked.

The Gadhafi precedent: Could attack on Libya set the stage for action against Israel?

By Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.

http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | There are many reasons to be worried about the bridge-leap the Obama administration has just undertaken in its war with Col. Moammar Gadhafi. How it will all end is just one of them.

Particularly concerning is the prospect that what we might call the Gadhafi precedent will be used in the not-too-distant future to justify and threaten the use of U.S. military forces against an American ally: Israel.

Here’s how such a seemingly impossible scenario might eventuate:

It begins with the Palestinian Authority seeking a United Nations Security Council resolution that would recognize its unilateral declaration of statehood. Three top female officials in the Obama administration reprise roles they played in the council’s recent action on Libya: U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice, a vehement critic of Israel, urges that the United States support (or at least not veto) the Palestinians’ gambit. She is supported by the senior director for multilateral affairs at the National Security Council, Samantha Power, who in the past argued for landing a “mammoth force” of American troops to protect the Palestinians from Israel. Ditto Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, whose unalloyed sympathy for the Palestinian cause dates back at least to her days as first lady.

This resolution enjoys the support of the other four veto-wielding Security Council members – Russia, China, Britain and France – as well as all of the other nonpermanent members except India, which joins the United States in abstaining. As a result, it is adopted with overwhelming support from what is known as the “international community.”

With a stroke of the U.N.’s collective pen, substantial numbers of Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and Israeli citizens find themselves on the wrong side of internationally recognized borders. The Palestinian Authority (PA) insists on its long-standing position: The sovereign territory of Palestine must be rid of all Jews.

The Israeli government refuses to evacuate the oft-condemned “settlements” now on Palestinian land or to remove the IDF personnel, checkpoints and facilities rightly seen as vital to protecting their inhabitants and, for that matter, the Jewish state itself.

Hamas and Fatah bury the hatchet (temporarily), forging a united front and promising democratic elections in the new Palestine. There, as in Gaza – and probably elsewhere in the wake of the so-called “Arab awakening” – the winner likely will be the Muslim Brotherhood, whose Palestinian franchise is Hamas.


The unified Palestinian proto-government then seeks international help to “liberate” its land. As with the Gadhafi precedent, the first to act is the Arab League. Its members unanimously endorse the use of force to protect the “Palestinian people” and end the occupation of the West Bank by the Israelis.

Turkey, which is still a NATO ally despite its ever-more-aggressive embrace of Islamism, is joined by Britain and France – two European nations increasingly hostile to Israel – in applauding this initiative in the interest of promoting “peace.” They call on the U.N. Security Council to authorize such steps as might be necessary to enforce the Arab League’s bidding.

Once again, Team Obama’s leading ladies – Mrs. Clinton, Ms. Power and Ms. Rice – align to support the “will of the international community.” They exemplify and are prepared to enforce the president’s willingness to subordinate U.S. sovereignty to the dictates of transnationalism and his personal hostility toward Israel. The concerns of Mr. Obama’s political advisers about alienating Jewish voters on the eve of the 2012 election are trumped by presidential sympathy for the Palestinian right to a homeland.

Accordingly, hard as it may be to believe given the United States’ long-standing role as Israel’s principal ally and protector, Mr. Obama acts in accordance with the Gadhafi precedent. He warns Israel that it must take steps immediately to dismantle its unwanted presence inside the internationally recognized state of Palestine lest it face the sort of U.S.- enabled “coalition” military measures now under way in Libya. In this case, they would be aimed at neutralizing IDF forces on the West Bank – and beyond, if necessary – in order to fulfill the “will of the international community.”

Of course, such steps would not result in the ostensibly desired endgame, namely “two states living side by side in peace and security.” If the current attack on Libya entails the distinct possibility of unintended (or at least unforeseen) consequences, application of the Gadhafi precedent to Israel seems certain to produce a very different outcome from the two-state “solution”: Under present and foreseeable circumstances, it will unleash a new regional war, with possible worldwide repercussions.

At the moment, it seems unlikely that the first application in Libya of the Gadhafi precedent will have results consistent with U.S. interests. Even if a positive outcome somehow is forthcoming there, should Mr. Obama and his anti-Israel troika of female advisers be allowed, based on that precedent, to realize the foregoing hypothetical scenario, they surely would precipitate a new international conflagration, one fraught with truly horrific repercussions – for Israel, the United States and freedom-loving people elsewhere.

A Congress that was effectively sidelined by Team Obama in the current crisis had better engage fully, decisively and quickly if it is to head off such a disastrous reprise.

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/gaffney032211.php3

- Here’s another article as food for thought -

WHY THE FRAMERS INCLUDED THE “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” CLAUSE

by Tom Deacon


The greatest defeat of the American Revolution was the fall of Charleston, SC to the British in 1780

(May 16, 2010) — Section 1 ofArticle II of the United States Constitution sets forth the eligibility requirements for serving as President of the United States:

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Try to understand this: At the time of the adoption of the Constitution there were no “natural born Citizens” (no country yet = no citizens, period?), so yes, the Founders wrote in a “grandfather” clause to allow those present (already born) at the time the Constitution was signed to qualify to be president.  However, if you weren’t born yet when the Constitution was adopted (that includes Obama), then you had to be a “natural born Citizen,” meaning both parents must be U.S. citizens. It is amazing how tough this is for some people to understand. The reason Congress “investigated” McCain was because he was not born in the USA. They concluded in their report that that was OK, because his “parents” (notice the plural form of “parents”) were both U.S. Citizens.  This is not true for Obama, and he clearly was not held to the same standard.

The Constitution says you must be a natural born Citizen, or a citizen at the time the Constitution was adopted. The Founders wanted the president to be a natural born Citizen, but they recognized that there were NO natural born Citizens until after the Constitution was adopted. They didn’t know that 200+ years from the signing, the education system would have dumbed down the USA’s population to the point that understanding it was an endangered ability.

Some may believe the natural born Citizen clause isn’t fair. The Founders of our nation believed it was the right thing to do because they had just fought a war with those who had allegiance to a country other than the one they were fighting to create….that country was the one they left to come to America, namely, England.  The Founders did not want to elect a newborn to the office of the president, nor did they want to wait 35 years for a natural born Citizen to meet the age requirement to be president. So they grandfathered themselves in with the statement “or a Citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution.” No doubt they trusted themselves and their children who were born prior to the signing of the Constitution to be loyal only to the USA, fighting a war with England would have had that effect on them.

Obama is the “poster child’ who proves once again that the wisdom of America’s Founders was impeccable.

You can make up excuses till the earth fries from global warming, but you can’t change the truth.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/05/16/note-to-obama-supporters-even-a-birth-in-hawaii-is-not-enough/


Obama Should Not Be President – OUR PRESIDENT has just called for the ETHNIC cleansing of the JEWS from their own land. This is not a “border” issue. This is ETHNIC CLEANSING

May 20, 2011

The arguments are the same.  The logic is equivalent.

If it is logical that Israel should give up their land then, the US should release the WEST to Mexico.

If the AZTECS want to CEDE from Mexico, because it was the SPANISH who came to Mexico, then should Mexico give up that portion of territory to them?  It was the Spaniards who unified a country of INDIANS and then settled it.  Doe that sound familiar?

Since the Jews would be cast out of their lives in their own country, then would that not indeed be the SAME as what occurred in Europe to the Czechs? and many other places where Jews and gypsies were driven out?

That is called ethnic cleansing.

OUR PRESIDENT has just called for the ETHNIC cleansing of the JEWS from their own land.

wiki defined ethnic cleansing:

Ethnic cleansing “is a purposeful policy designed by one ethnic or religious group to remove by violent and terror-inspiring means the civilian population of another ethnic or religious group from certain geographic areas. (Commission of Experts Established Pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 780)”.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_cleansing

This presidents logic, if transposed on our own situation, would create an ethnic cleansing here.  If he didn’t follow the SAME logic, then the WORLD would see America as a hypocrite.  Which, would not be favorable to all you appeasers out there.  It’s a LOOSE / LOOSE LOGIC.

This argument WILL come up and be used.  Mark my words.

Rabbi: ‘The President of the United States is Asking for Ethnic Cleansing’

Thursday, May 19, 2011
By Fred Lucas

Obama taxesPresident Barack Obama. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak, File)

(CNSNews.com) – President Barack Obama has made an unprecedented demand on Israel, Jewish leaders said Thursday, after the president called for Israel to redraw its borders to where they were in 1967 before the Six Day War. One rabbi said Obama was, in essence, asking for “ethnic cleansing” of thousands of Jewish families.

“It’s immoral in that basically the president of the United States is asking that 500,000 people who live, work, and raise families around Jerusalem – Jewish families – that they be uprooted, resettled, deported from their homes, have their families broken,” Rabbi Aryeh Spero, founder of Caucus for America, told CNSNews.com.

“The president of the United States is asking for ethnic cleansing,” said Rabbi Spero.  “It’s ironic that the president, who speaks in humanitarian tones regarding the Palestinians, doesn’t have any humanitarian concerns toward 500,000 Jewish people and families that will be uprooted and deported from their homes.”

Obama made the demand on Israel during a speech on the Middle East, delivered at the State Department on Thursday, as a way to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But Spero believes Obama was not being honest.

“Every time Israel relinquishes land on the altar of peace, it gets not peace but rockets,” Spero said. “This has been played over and over by the Palestinian Authority, then with Yasser Arafat, with Hamas. He knows what will happen with the Israelis, and yet it doesn’t seem to bother him.”

“I’m just very disappointed that my president seems to be so indifferent to the plight of the Jewish people in Israel,” he said.

Though Israel has given up land to Palestinians in the past because of pressure from the United States, no U.S. president has asked this much, said Rabbi Gershon Tannenbaum, director of the Rabbinical Alliance of America.

rabbi aryeh speroRabbi Aryeh Spero

“It’s par for the course, but not to this extent,” Tannenbaum told CNSNews.com. “In other words, other presidents have also pressured Israel with the hope of achieving some kind of peace. But considering the history and considering facts on the ground, no president has been as severe as President Obama.”

However, Tannenbaum thinks the proposal is a non-starter primarily because the borders have never been the issue.

“The suggestion is going to die, this is not going to work,” he said. “It won’t go anywhere. If you notice, there was an attack on all the borders of the state of Israel. There was an attack on the 1967 borders. The problem with Israel for the Palestinians is the very existence of the state of Israel — not its borders — but that it exists at all. They will not rest until there is no Israel.”

But Spero is not so sure the proposal will just go away, even without support from Congress.

“While he [Obama] can’t force the Jewish people out of their lands, he can certainly pressure Israel to the point where it finds itself in a very insecure state of affairs,” said Rabbi Spero. “He could without certain military weapons and parts that are needed for Israel’s defense. So, it’s a tremendous amount of intimidation and pressure.”

Israel expanded its territory after the Six Day War defeating Egypt, Jordan and Syria. Israel gained the West Bank, the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem, the Gaza Strip, and the Sinai Peninsula (the Sinai was returned to Egypt in a deal brokered in 1978). Since 1967, and most notably in the early 1990s, Israel gave up significant amounts of land for peace to the Palestinians. The conflict has nevertheless raged onward.

“The reason Israel today is bigger than it was in 1967 is because the Arab countries united in an attack against Israel,” Tannenbaum said. “Miraculously, Israel fought them off and won. Now Israel has returned a majority of the West Bank and Israel has returned the Gaza Strip. There still is no peace. So at this point, returning more land is counterproductive and is not the answer. And the president is wrong in his plan.”

IsraelIsrael

On the eve of a visit to the U.S. by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the timing of the announcement seemed calculating, said Rabbi Yehuda Levin, a spokesman for the Rabbinical Alliance of America.

“I’m not a political Zionist,” said the rabbi. “I have my problems with the state of Israel and the things that they do that flies in the face of our religious traditional heritage. Nevertheless, in terms of security for human beings, one has to be totally concerned. I have many family members and extended family members and fellow Jews in Israel and I’m concerned for their safety.”

“I’m just prayerful that the Congress of the United States will respond to the Jewish people and residents of Israel that the position of one human being as president does not reflect what the country feels,” Levin said.

Obama recognized the negotiations would be a challenge because of the agreement between the Fatah, the leading Palestinian political party and the terrorist group Hamas, but he reaffirmed America’s relationship with Israel.

Still the speech has sparked concern and widespread coverage.

“We welcome the president’s recognition of Israel’s security needs and that Hamas cannot be a partner in the peace process, but a call to a return to 1967 borders as the basis for negotiations, even with ‘land swaps’ is a non-starter, when at least half of the Palestinian rulers are committed to Israel’s destruction,” said Rabbis Marvin Hier and Abraham Cooper, founder of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in a written statement. “The road to peace has been clear for a long time — direct negotiations between parties who recognize each other’s legitimacy.”

Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla), in a statement released after the president’s speech, said: “This proposal is a slap in the face of our friend and democracy’s only ally in the Middle East: Israel. As a nation, we should support and promote freedom and democracy in the region, but we should not do so at the expense of Israel.  That land belongs to Israel – period.”

“Based on archeological evidence and historical right, that land belongs to Israel,” said Inhofe. “As I have outlined several times before, Israel is a strategic ally to the United States that acts as a roadblock to terrorism.  Every other country in that region hates Israel and would stop at nothing for Israel’s destruction just as they would stop at nothing to see our own destruction.”

“President Obama’s speech today kowtows to the very forces that hate us,” said the senator. “I will try to address all these issues on the Senate floor next week to refute President Obama’s message today.”

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/rabbis-respond-obama-speech-ethnic-clean


Canada – Geert Wilders – May 10 0211, free speech and the double standard for ISLAM – Muslim fundamentalists and the end of LIBERALS agendas

May 13, 2011

Great interview!

Geert Wilders interview Ottawa Canada May 10 2011

By EEYORE | Published: MAY 11, 2011

Last night, Geert Wilders spoke to a packed house in Ottawa Canada where he was greeted, I am proud to say, with a standing ovation as he walked into the room.

James Cohen who works extensively with the Free Thinking Film Society and with the International Free Press Society was able to get an interview with Geert yesterday afternoon at the club where the private reception for Geert took place. I am editing the video of the speeches from the National Arts Centre yesterday evening of Geert, Ezra Levant and Rabbi Jonathan Housman and hope to have those up sometime tomorrow. All were excellent. Meanwhile, here is the interview with Geert.Thanks again to IFPS-Canada as well as Fred Litwin’s Free Thinking Film Society for putting on this event.

Once again, Firefox users will have to click here and watch the interview over at bankoran.com while everyone else should be able to see the video here.

Geert Wilders interview Ottawa Canada May 10 2011, posted with vodpod

Interview with Geert Wilders. Ottawa May 10th 2011 from Vlad Tepes on Vimeo.

This entry was posted in CanadaFree Thinking Film SocietyFree Thinking Films,freedom of speechFreedomsGeert WildersIslam in EuropeIslam in the Americas,The NetherlandsWest fights back. Bookmark the permalinkPost a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Obama administrations LGBT initiative to redefine marriage and family by executive fiat.

May 7, 2011

By what authority does this government have to impose these barbaric regulations on this country?

Barbaric, correct.  This is barbaric.

The freeks don’t WANT to conform to society.  The rest of US have to conform to them?

How is this democratic?  When did the few and obnoxious get to MAKE the rules for the rest of us?  When was it decided that it was not the MAJORITY RULE but the MINORITY decree?

Why have we let these clowns destroy the family and morality?

This is not FREEDOM.  This is the immoral few setting the agenda for the many, because the majority have been told to sit down and – SHUT UP!

HOW is the below Constitutional?

For children to be taught this type of thing in school is against the perversion laws that are still on the books in many states and cities.

Kevin Jennings agenda is coming to the fro:

Seven year olds are shown graphic sex cartoon – as part of their education curriculum

This man is still working as the “SAFE SCHOOL” CZAR.

These CZAR things need to be abolished and these people arrested for child abuse.

—Here are some more that come to mind:

orthwestern U. – From the IVY league to the lowest depths of perversion -Sex show professor defends live demo for students
Skins – British, now American soft porn – another reason to get your kids an iPhone
Planned Parenthood – Launches new “initiative” to teach PARENTS how to PERVERT their kids. Margaret Sanger began PP as a Eugenics program.
Helena, Montana – Kindergarten SEX education is right out of the Kevin Jennings play book – Education CZAR, appointed by Obama, and who was the founder the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network.
Girls – as young as 7 years old are target markets for the sex industry. Parents complicit in the perversion of their own daughters
 

Sex Change You Can Believe In! Obama is the Most Pro-Transgender President Ever

Posted on May 5, 2011 by Ben Johnson

by Ben Johnson

Your Tax dollars at work: HUD’s new ad campaign promoting transgender rights.

Call it sex-change you can believe in. This author reported Tuesday that Barack Obama had held the first-ever White House transgender conference last Friday. The People’s House conducted this proud meeting in such complete secrecy that we know the identity of only one attendee, Mara Keisling of the National Center for Transgender Equality (NCTE), a group lobbying for “a comprehensive civil rights bill that protects people from discrimination based on gender identity.” The measure, which would forbid private individuals from refusing to do business with or rent a home to a cross-dresser, is but one of many extremist policies that earned NCTE a meeting with White House brass. The U.S. Civil Rights Commission is now planning to “hold its first-ever hearing to specifically address the civil rights of LGBT people.” Despite these “firsts,” the Obama administration has already advanced transgender interest groups through a series of executive fiats. If you don’t believe me, believe The Huffington Post. It remarked that a recent housing proposal “marks the latest in a string of Obama administration attempts to enhance gay rights through federal regulation.” Some of the administration’s actions literally redefine the government’s definition of the family, stifle any opposition to gender confusion, and encourage schoolchildren to think of transgender practices as normal and mainstream (or else).

The First Transgender Appointee?

Last January, Obama named Amanda Simpson the Senior Technical Advisor to the Commerce Department. Simpson, who served as a test pilot and longtime employee of Raytheon before becoming a “woman,” sits on NCTE’s board of directors. The move was thought to be the first-ever transgender presidential appointment.

During his budget showdown with John Boehner, Obama (and Boehner) managed to see thatLGBT programs escaped deep budget cuts. Aside from these two matters, Obama has chosen to act through federal regulation, having government agencies write new rules without sullying his own hands. His administration has proven indefatigable in pursuing transgender concerns.

Thoughtcrime, Obama-Style

Last Thursday, Labor Secretary Hilda Solis (an Open Borders advocate) issued the department’s new harassment policy, which applies not only to the department but to all its “contractors at every level.” It bans any “unwelcome conduct, verbal or physical, based on race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy and gender identity), national origin, age, disability, genetic information, parental status, or sexual orientation.” This includes “making jokes or remarks that are offensive,” with “offensive” defined by the offended. Any infraction will result in “corrective and disciplinary action, up to and including removal, against all persons who have been found to have engaged in that conduct.” Upon hearing of this, theTransgender Law Center thanked Solis and Obama.

Solis has been on the frontlines of advancing LGBT interests. Last June, the Department of Labor redefined the terms “son and daughter” to include homosexual non-relatives.

Unfortunately, this is not the only way LGBT activists are coming after your sons and daughters.

Mainstreaming Cross-Dressers in Public Schools

NCTE has seconded “Safe Schools” Czar Kevin Jennings’ efforts to promote the LGBT agenda under the guise of fighting “bullying.” In March, Harper Jean Tobin, an attorney and expert on transsexuality who serves as NCTE policy counsel, attended the National Summit on Gender-Based Violence Among Youth, sponsored by the U.S. Department of Education, Justice, and Health and Human Services (HHS). The NCTE told officials to force schools to:

Harper Jean noted that at the March summit on “bullying,” (s)he had a nice “inspiring” tête-à-tête with Russlyn Ali and Tom Perez, who head up civil rights enforcement at the Departments of Justice and Education.

Perez, the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, may have perjured himself before the U.S. Civil Rights Commission while testifying about the DoJ’s dismissal of the Black Panther voter intimidation case.

The LGBT activists and Obama administration officials know Americans differ sharply on the issues of homosexuality and cross-dressing, with traditional Christians rejecting both practicesin toto. They do not care. Their attitude seems to be, whatever parents believe, their children belong to The State eight hours a day and must adopt the Left’s amoral views during that time. Since children are especially impressionable and peer pressure is a defining factor for many children, The State is using the public schools to indoctrinate children into accepting lifestyles their parents find immoral.

Confirmation of Illegal Propaganda?

Tobin noted the “conference was used to announce the launch of no fewer than ten new anti-bullying campaigns and resources by participating organizations ranging from Facebook to the National PTA to StopBullying.gov, a federal website bringing together key resources, including resources on protecting LGBT youth.” This lends further confirmation that the Obama White House invites far-Left organizations to government events, then asks them to shill for its programs – a fact confirmed by left-wing activist Sally Kohn, who attended a series of outreach programs run by the White House’s Office of Public Engagement (OPE) headed by Valerie Jarrett. (Coincidentally, the NCTE’s blog has an entry shilling for ObamaCare, although the post has no specific content about transgender people.) Congressman Darrell Issa has demonstratedthis constitutes illegal covert propaganda.

Apparently, the propaganda runs both ways.

Federal Propaganda Campaign

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) celebrated April, “fair housing month,” by launching a year-long, $41 million campaign to fight “discrimination.” Its “Live Free” ad campaign singles out transgender people as an especially victimized class. (The campaign also prints Spanish language posters encouraging “victims” to report housing discrimination against “persons of foreign descent.”)

HUD is, well, proud its subservience to LGBT concerns has caused transgender “gender discrimination” complaints to skyrocket by more than 1,500 percent in one year.

'Offensive': Mrs Bullivant withdrew her daughter from the school after the graphic cartoon was shown to a class of seven-year-olds

'Offensive': Mrs Bullivant withdrew her daughter from the school after the graphic cartoon was shown to a class of seven-year-olds

Redefining the Term “Family”

The housing department is similarly pleased with a new rule in the Federal Register that this author exposed in January, which would literally redefine the term “family” to include gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender couples.

HUD Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing John Trasviña recently revealed the rule is moving full-steam ahead. “HUD is finalizing a federal rule to ensure that HUD housing and programs are open to all, irrespective of marital status, gender identify, and sexual orientation,” he said.Metro Weekly, a D.C.-area LGBT publication, has noted how radical this stroke-of-the-pen is, reporting the proposed rule would “expand the reach of sexual orientation and gender identity protections without changing that law because, as [HUD Secretary Shaun] Donovan said in January, the ‘[Federal Housing Administration] represents one-third of all mortgages in this country.’”

The covers 4.4 million HUD-financed housing units that accept funds from such programs as section 8 housing, public housing, Federal Housing Administration (FHA) programs, Community Development Block Grants, and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA). Ironically, Section 8 vouchers are often distributed through local churches, which will now be bound by this rule that violates its most sacred teachings about human sexuality.

Where it cannot pass or make laws, the Obama administration will simply pretend they exist. In July 2010, HUD announced it would enforce the Fair Housing Act as though it included sexual orientation and transgendered people – which it does not – arguing that discriminating against a man dressed as a woman could be construed as prejudice against women.

The Obama administration disregards the rule of law at will, now ignoring laws it wishes not to enforce (DOMA, voter intimidation against whites, illegal immigration laws), now drafting executive orders or regulations to make law from thin air, and sometimes twisting existing laws to apply to situations they clearly does not cover.

Rule by Executive Decree

Not surprisingly, transgender organizations are among those encouraging Obama to rule by executive orderThe Washington Blade reported sexual activists “have been pressing Obama to issue an executive order that would bar the federal government from contracting with companies that don’t have non-discrimination policies based on sexual orientation and gender identity for their workforce. Such a directive has been seen as an interim alternative while Republicans remain in control of the U.S. House to passing the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would bar job bias against LGBT people.” This is precisely what Hilda Solis implemented, albeit through federal regulation rather than an executive order. The impact is the same: a revolutionary cultural policy most Americans viscerally reject foisted upon them by liberal government decree. This disregard for the will of the people, this use of force to impose immorality from above, is the essence of modern liberalism.

Big Government and Immorality are Life-Partners

Few people believed Barack Obama’s protests when he insisted he did not want to own a car company. In fact, big government liberals want to own, control, or subsidize as much of the country as possible. The more the nation is dependent upon government, the more the liberals who control government can enforce their will. HUD pays the rent on 4.4 million housing units; now, with the stroke of a pen, the owners must open their doors to those they may consider perverts and sexual deviates.

First, liberals expand the reach of government. Second, they broaden the ability of the president to pass laws independent of Congress. Finally, they use this power to overturn traditional values as far as lies within their power.

Americans must combat this by rejecting government funds and returning to self-reliance, reviving traditional morality, and reducing the size and scope of government. Only when government is deprived of such power and purview can those who find such practices abhorrent rest assured they will not be forced to approve of them in their workplace, their schools, or their homes.

http://floydreports.com/sex-change-you-can-believe-in-obama-enacts-transgender-policies-by-executive-fiat/


The POLICE STATE – TSA announces check points to malls and other “soft” targets. YOU are the criminal and must be searched.

May 5, 2011

Due to the ineptitude created by the POLITICALLY CORRECT and other vehicles, you are now going to be the criminal.  YOU are checked.  We can’t say that MUSLIMS and people from the ME are potential enemies.  We can’t or we’ll be sued for libel or targeted by OUR OWN GOVERNMENT

TSA Security Checkpoints Coming To A “Soft” Spo…, posted with vodpod

I contend that this falls under the Fourth Amendment – illegal search and seizure.  This country will no longer be free, if we allow this.  The terrorists will find other ways, and YOU will be checkmated by YOUR government.  Criminals don’t follow the law.  These laws will only restrict YOUR freedom to move around and in that case, you are the criminal.

The UK is already targeting people for PRE – CRIME:

UK – England – People arrested for PRE – CRIME – “conspiracy to commit a crime” – first the thought police and now PRE CRIME

When they took guns away from the military bases, they left soldiers unable to defend themselves against the criminals who don’t follow the law.  These LAWS are not meant to protect YOU, they are meant to render YOU defenseless.

All you useful idiots are fodder to them.


UK – England – People arrested for PRE – CRIME – “conspiracy to commit a crime” – first the thought police and now PRE CRIME

May 4, 2011

Wow.

This is coming to America, unless we continue to stand by our freedoms.

England is no longer a democracy or a free people.  They are subjects to anyones “suspicions” and “allegations” for whatever they can dream up.

Welcome, to the new world order, indeed.

Charlie Veitch Arrested to Prevent Royal Wedding Protest [Video]

By DJ Pangburn Tuesday, May 03, 2011

Two things to consider: Protest is criminalized and it was done so with “Minority Report”-style pre-crime maneuvers.

Charlie Veitch was none too subtle.  After the London TUC protests on March 26th, Veitch and his group the Love Police announced that they would launch “Disruption Spectacular” at Prince William’s Wedding.

It should be known that Veitch and the Love Police are non-violent protesters, many of them (including Veitch) being anarchists, and the “Disruption Spectacular” rhetoric was delivered in the spirit of the Diggers or Abbie Hoffman and the Yippies, and was not made in the same vein as violent protests in North Africa and the Middle East.

Veitch became an anti-Royalist and anarchist after being made redundant at his banking job, which forced him to reassess both his life, as well as the political and economic circumstances of both London and the world-at-large.  Thus, when the Love Police announced their intention to spectacularly protest Prince William’s wedding, it was a symbolic action to demonstrate against royal opulence in the face of forced austerity which triggered the TUC protests.

In an attempt to prevent Veitch and the Love Police from protesting, London Police came to his flat and placed him under arrest for “suspicion of conspiracy to cause a public nuisance,” as well as “suspicion of aggravated trespass at Fortnum & Mason.”

Veitch’s girlfriend managed to tape the entire exchange with the arresting officers, in which Veitch asks, “is it okay if I bring a novel?”  The officer demurs and says, “Um… I don’t think so, no.  We have reading material at the station.”  Veitch, in a humorous reposte, says, “Yeah, I’ll bring a couple of books.”

If you’re going to be jailed, why not entertain yourself with some fiction. To quote the arresting officer, “Lovely.”

If this can happen in London, it can happen anywhere, including America. And as humorous as some of Veitch’s comments and actions are in the arrest video, remember that his right to free speech was violated to silence his political views, always expressed through street theater and never violent.

And, honestly, I almost feel bad for the primary arresting officer. He seems polite enough and a good listener. One can even sense the vague recognition that he is arresting one of his own, and doing it on behalf of the powerful and elite (and on behalf of a royal family that doesn’t give the slightest fuck about his own existence).

Another bit of humor—Veitch can be heard brushing his teeth, then comes out and starts talking with a mouthful of toothpaste.  In addressing the arresting officer statement about the trespassing at Fortnum & Mason’s, Veitch says, “They got nothing on me.  The police asked us to leave Fortnum & Mason’s.  We left.  They got nothing on me.”

Imagine how the world could be if the working class police didn’t do the bidding of the politically powerful and rich.

Royal Wedding Purge 2011: Charlie Veitch Arrest, posted with vodpod

http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/85139/charlie-veitch-arrested-to-prevent-royal-wedding-protest-video/


Washington, Tieton – Illegal alien with many felonies allowed to flourish and become “El Kilo” a respected member of Los Zetas

April 20, 2011

Why blame this guy?

He’s doing what ALL predators do.  He’s acting in his own best interest.

The bigger question is WHY did the state of Washington act as an accessory to this felon?  If they had knowledge of him being an illegal alien, then they had the OBLIGATION to remove him from the American society.  This obligation was not only skirmished, but in a way puts them into being accessories to crime.   They had first knowledge that he was a criminal and chose to let him walk.  They, then by allowing him to be free, allowed him to commit the subsequent multitude of crimes that he committed.  At the very least it’s a dereliction of duty.

Where is Napalitano regarding this?

What did they think these sanctuary policies were going to bring?  They had no idea that voter fraud would yield this sort of thing?  What?  They thought that people who break to law one way would not continue their LIE no matter what?  I guess they now see that this is not the best of logic.

AND IT’S STILL POLITICALLY INCORRECT TO SAY THAT NOT ALL ILLEGAL ALIENS COME HERE TO WORK?!!!

Mexican drug cartel suspect grew up in Tieton, WA

Updated 09:36 a.m., Wednesday, April 20, 2011
Members of the Navy escort Martin Omar Estrada Luna, center, alias "El Kilo," during a presentation to the press in Mexico City, Sunday, April 17, 2011. The Mexican Navy said Saturday it had captured Estrada Luna, the presumed leader of the San Fernando cell of the Zetas drug gang, suspected in the case of the mass graves found in Tamaulipas, as well as the migrant massacre last August in the violent border state across from Texas. Photo: Marco Ugarte / AP

Members of the Navy escort Martin Omar Estrada Luna, center, alias "El Kilo," during a presentation to the press in Mexico City, Sunday, April 17, 2011. The Mexican Navy said Saturday it had captured Estrada Luna, the presumed leader of the San Fernando cell of the Zetas drug gang, suspected in the case of the mass graves found in Tamaulipas, as well as the migrant massacre last August in the violent border state across from Texas. Photo: Marco Ug

YAKIMA, Wash. (AP) — A man accused of leading a violent drug cartel in Mexico grew up in central Washington and committed crimes in the town of Tieton before he was deported, the Yakima Herald-Republic reported Wednesday.

Martin Omar Estrada Luna, 34, is remembered by Tieton Police Chief Jeff Ketchum from the 1990s.

“I would label Martin as a career criminal. He got away with a lot of stuff. He got named in a lot of stuff, but you could never pin it on him,” Ketchum said.

Estrada Luna acknowledged being a gang member, Ketchum said. His nickname was “El Kilo,” according to court records.

Mexican authorities arrested Estrada Luna in a house Saturday in Ciudad Victoria, the capital of the state of Tamaulipas in northeastern Mexico. They presented him Sunday in Mexico City as a leader of the Los Zetas cartel, blamed for killing more than 200 people found in mass graves. Some of the victims were passengers pulled off buses, possibly as part of a forced recruitment effort.

Yakima County records show Estrada Luna falling into the gang life instead of making it to school with any sort of regularity. He could have graduated in 1995 but he pleaded guilty that year to second-degree burglary in connection with the theft of a car from the school district. The judge ordered him not to have any contact with district schools as part of the plea.

Yakima County Superior Court records listed him as unemployed.

Beside the burglary, his adult felony convictions in Yakima County include brandishing a knife in Tieton.

When Estrada Luna was sentenced in 2006 for an immigration violation, federal prosecutors pointed out that he had managed to amass 16 felony and misdemeanor convictions.

Estrada Luna was ultimately sentenced to 41 months for returning to the United States a third time after being deported twice before.

Immigrations and Customs Enforcement said Tuesday that he was deported in 2009 from Reno, Nev., after completing his sentence.

The ICE database shows no contact with Estrada Luna since that last deportation.

___

Information from: Yakima Herald-Republic, http://www.yakimaherald.com
http://www.seattlepi.com/news/article/Mexican-drug-cartel-suspect-grew-up-in-Tieton-WA-1344969.php#ixzz1K7AlFfjf


US – Downgraded! The OBAMA PLAN revealed. – Obama Should not be President.

April 18, 2011

His incompetence and illegal Presidency should be REDACTED.

This man has destabilized the country as the nail in the coffin.

Soros’ henchman is what he is.  The Communists (Globalists) tool.

He is in direct violation of Article 1 section 9 – nobility clause.

His birth is questionable

His actions are directly contrary to American security and sovereignty.

It’s said that one knows one by ones friends and associates.   Obama cavorts with thugs and thieves.  Truly, horrible people.  People who are terrorists and those who would seek to do harm to people in America and America ITSELF.  This is not an American President.  He is the Anti American President.  People from other countries come and have babies who take advantage of America.  Voter fraud is sanctioned through sanctuary cities.

This is EVIL

Stocks sink after US debt outlook downgrade

(AP) – 1 hour ago

NEW YORK (AP) — Stocks are falling sharply lower after Standard & Poor’s dropped its outlook on U.S debt quality to negative.

Even as it cut its outlook, the agency reaffirmed the U.S. debt rating itself at AAA.

International concerns are also weighing on stocks even after several companies reported earnings that beat expectations.

Traders are facing the renewed threat of a Greek debt default. China took another step to curb its runaway inflation.

In morning trading, the Dow Jones industrial average is down 175 points, or 1.4 percent. The Standard & Poor’s 500 is down 19, or 1.5 percent. The Nasdaq composite is down 40, or 1.5 percent.


Obama’s Birth certificate issue – Investigative reporter received notification of being “marked” – Alex Jones records that Madsen is NOT suicidal

April 18, 2011

The main stream media is not investigating.

The reason is because the government is covering this up.

Wow!  Is this soviet Russia?

Are we really living in a free country?

Wayne Madsen – Death Threat – April 13 2011 – p…, posted with vodpod

1st collector for Wayne Madsen – Death Threat – April 13 2011 – p…
Follow my videos on vodpod

HAT TIP

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/04/17/wayne-madsen-on-obama-white-houses-death-threats/


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 58 other followers

%d bloggers like this: