Obama’s solution – Israel should give up land for peace. Obama’s knowledge of history is stunted as is his logic.

Obama’s False Choice

By Jonathan Tobin

http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | In his address to AIPAC Sunday morning, President Obama doubled down on the points he made in his speech on Thursday. After a lengthy, and not entirely unjustified defense of his administration’s record of support for Israel’s security, he continued talking down to the Jewish state and its government as if he knew better than they about the situation in the Middle East.

Following the talking points that the administration has been furiously spinning since Thursday, Obama attempted to explain that there was nothing original or new in his attempt to lay down the 1967 lines as the starting point for future talks. It is true, as he asserted that his line bout “mutually agreed upon swaps” of territory means that the “borders will be different.” But contrary to his claim that this is what past administrations also support, the Bush 2004 letter let it be known that the United States supported Israel’s claims on Jerusalem and the major settlement blocs. Obama is neutral about Israel’s borders. That is why the Palestinians view his support of the 1967 borders as a green light for them to refuse to talk unless Israel agrees to surrender every inch of territory.

Even worse, Obama’s lecture about why Israel must make further concessions in spite of Arab intransigence was condescending and somewhat misleading. Obama said that demographics and technology mean the status quo can’t be sustained and implicitly accused Israel of “procrastination.” But Israel has already offered the Palestinians a state in virtually all of the West Bank, part of Jerusalem and Gaza and been turned down twice. Even the supposedly right-wing government of Benjamin Netanyahu has made its commitment to a two-state solution clear. Obama says Israel can’t wait “another decade or two or three decades” to make peace. But Israel has been trying to make peace for 63 years. The world may be “moving too fast” to wait for peace but why must he lecture the Israelis when it is the Palestinians who refuse to talk, let alone recognize the legitimacy of a Jewish state no matter where its borders are drawn?

 Road Map to Peace


Although Obama rightly declared that the United States would oppose attempts to bypass the peace process via the United Nations, his mention of the 1967 borders will be used, as it has already by the Palestinians, to buttress their attempt to get recognition for an independent state inside those lines with no recognition of Israel.

Like all Obama speeches, the president presented a false choice in which he said the “easy thing” would be to say nothing about the peace process rather than to confront it as he has done. Democratic Party donors will have the final word on how foolish his attempt to ambush Netanyahu this past week. But the real false choice is the notion that it is somehow in Israel’s power to magically create peace. That decision has always been in the hands of the Palestinians and the Arab world. So long as they ally themselves with terrorists and refuse to negotiate and to demand a “right of return” which would destroy Israel (and which Obama again failed to condemn) there will be no peace.

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0511/tobin052311.php3

About these ads

3 Responses to Obama’s solution – Israel should give up land for peace. Obama’s knowledge of history is stunted as is his logic.

  1. dzul says:

    BECAUSE BEFORE 1950 ISRAEL BRIGAND NEVER EXISTED IN PALESTINE

    PALESTINE GOVERNMENT HAS ALREADY THERE AS THE LEGAL OWNER OF LAND

    SO WHAT THE HELL
    U.S MADE
    JEWS REFUGEES TURN TO ISRAEL BRIGAND TO OCCUPIED LAND OF PALESTINE

    PALESTINE GOVERNMENT HAS THE RIGHTS TO KICK ALL ISRAEL BRIGAND OUT OF PALESTINE LAND

    &

    if 63 years old war in PALESTINE still go on

    &

    350 years old battle of ever more for your references history
    INDONESIANS WON WAR AGAINST COLLONIALSM
    THEN KICKED ALL BRIGAND OUT OF INDONESIANS LAND in 1945

    &

    COLLONIALSM WAS THE CAPITAL CRIME
    IT’S AGAINST HUMAN RIGHTS

    THAT’S WHY ALL COLLONIALSM MUST BE WIPE FROM THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH

    • txlady706 says:

      Dxul:
      Thanks for being clear in your logic. It’s as false as it can be and your facts have no reality in history.
      Palestine has no government. It is not a state. It’s existence has been the result of Israel’s sustenance. If Israel didn’t provide the water and electricity, the Palestinians are soooo helpless and useless that they are starve and die. This is evidenced by the fact that every place that had infrastructure and was given to the Palestinians was later turned in to a waste land. They have no capacity to TRY to take care of themselves. They destroy and suck dry everything around them.
      Indonesians? What are you talking about? What geographical perspective is this?
      You make no sense.

  2. [...] Obama’s solution – Israel should give up land for peace. Obama’s knowledge of hist… (txlady706.wordpress.com) [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 59 other followers

%d bloggers like this: