The LIB’s and DEM’s had to pass a RESOLUTION in a back door way of making OBAMA legal to be president.
I contend that this is in itself not constitutional nor legal and at the very least – IT DOESN’T PASS THE ETHICAL LITMUS TEST.
It smell and sounds like dirty pool to me. This is not what would be called “in the intent” of the constitution. It really doesn’t sound like it would pass any vein of Law.
YET AGAIN - WE THE PEOPLE ARE TOLD TO SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP!
This is right out of WIKI
On July 27, the House of Representatives passed a resolution commemorating the 50th anniversary of Hawaii’s statehood. The resolution, containing language recognizing Hawaii as President Obama’s birth state, passed by a vote of 378 to zero.[218] Some of the cosponsors of the Posey bill, namely Campbell, Carter, and Marchant, did not cast a vote.[219]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_citizenship_conspiracy_theories
Why doesn’t the mainstream media air this? It is not fluff. There are laws that were followed and the they not AMERICAN
Americans have broken the laws and it’s statesmen have lost the TRUST of the PEOPLE
Once again I ask———————-Why has no one in the ME called OBAMA an apostate?
“The Indonesian Citizenship Myth” – Part 1
by Jacob5742 of AR, Tue 2/9
I have read one post in BadFiction.com in detail about Obama’s Indonesian citizenship and must say, with all due respect, I disagree. Some very important parts were left out, which I do not believe was intentional. Thus, I would like to respond accordingly.
First, I am unsure as to where BadFiction obtained the Indonesian laws, I’m unsure as to the dates, etc. However, there are discrepancies.
BadFiction is correct in stating that if a woman married a foreign citizen they would have lost their U.S. citizenship status if married prior to September 22, 1922. However, there is more to this, see 8 U.S.C. Section 1435(a)(2) which states “on or after September 22, 1922, a women who lost United States citizenship by marriage to an alien ineligible to citizenship…” However, Indonesia also required Stanley Ann Dunham to relinquish her U.S. Citizenship, which is an affirmative act, therefore, Stanley Ann Dunham did not simply lose her U.S. Citizenship status by marriage alone.
BadFiction claims that a parent cannot expatriate a child’s U.S. citizenship, however, this is not correct. See The Nationality Act of 1940, revised 1952, Section 318(a) “A former citizen of the United States expatriated through the expatriation of such person’s parent or parents and who has not acquired the nationality of another country by any affirmative act other than the expatriation of his parent or parents may be naturalized upon filing a petition for naturalization before reaching age of twenty-five years and upon compliance with all requirements of the naturalization laws with the following exceptions: (b) No former citizen of the United States, expatriated through the expatriation of such person’s parent or parents shall be obliged to comply with the requirements of the immigration laws, if he has not not acquired the nationality of another country by any affirmative act other than the expatriation of his parent or parents, and if he has come or shall come to the United States before reaching the age of twenty-five years. (c) After his naturalization such person shall have the same citizenship status as if he had not been expatriated.”
Renewing an Indonesian Passport after the age of 18 is an affirmative act, as you are swearing allegiance to another Country. Soetoro/Obama renewed his Indonesian Passport when he traveled to Pakistan, that is why he had to stop in Indonesia first. Remember, in 1981, Dunham was divorcing Soetoro in Hawaii and was not in Indonesia. Obama/Soetoro admits to traveling to Indonesia first and then onto Pakistan. Soetoro/Obama claims in his book “Dreams from my father” that he stopped in Indonesia to visit his mother. But again, his mother was not in Indonesia, she was in Hawaii with Maya, divorcing Lolo Soetoro. In addition, the State Department has stated in response to a FOIA request that they do not have a U.S. Passport application on file for Barack H. Obama.
Despite the above however, Indonesia required Obama/Soetoro to do a bit more upon his 18th birthday. In fact the Indonesian law gives until the age of 21. Soetoro/Obama would have had to sign an Affidavit relinquishing his Indonesian citizenship and said Affidavit had to be sent to the Indonesian Government before reclaiming any U.S. citizenship he may have once held.
When it comes to the citizenship of individuals in other countries, we are prevented from interfering, Hague Convention 1930. Speaking of Indonesia, during the late 60’s all the way up until 2006 Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship. In 2006 they changed their laws to permit dual citizenship, however, Indonesia has had its battles with enforcing their new law permitting dual citizenship.
With this said, from the research we have done, it appears that Soetoro became an Indonesian citizen. When Soetoro/Obama was approximately four (4) years old his parents divorced and thereafter, Soetoro/Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia. Evidence points to the fact that Lolo Soetoro either signed a government form legally “acknowledging” Soetoro/Obama as his son or “adopted” Soetoro, either of which changed any citizenship status Soetoro/Obama had to a “natural” citizen of Indonesia.
At the time Barry Soetoro was in Indonesia, all Indonesian students were required to carry government identity cards or Karty Tanda Pendudaks, as well as family card identification called a Kartu Keluarga. The Kartu Keluarga is a family card which bears the legal names and citizenship status of all family members.
Soetoro/Obama was registered in a public school as an Indonesian citizen by the name of Barry Soetoro and his father was listed as Lolo Soetoro, M.A. Indonesia did not allow foreign students to attend their public schools in the late 1960’s or 1970’s, and any time a child was registered for a public school, the child’s name and citizenship status were verified through the Indonesian Government. See Constitution of Republic of Indonesia (Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945), Chapter 13, Law No. 62 of 1958 (all citizens of Indonesia have a right to education). The Indonesian school record, indicates that Soetoro/Obama’s name is “Barry Soetoro;” his nationality is “Indonesia” and his father “Lolo Soetoro, M.A. There was no way for Soetoro/Obama to have attended school in Jakarta, Indonesia legally unless he was an Indonesian citizen, as Indonesia was under tight rule and was a Police State. See Constitution of Republic of Indonesia (Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945), Law No. 62 of 1958. These facts indicate that Obama/Soetoro is an Indonesian citizen, and therefore he is not eligible to be President of the United States.
Under Indonesian law, when a male acknowledges a child as his son, it deems the son, in this case Soetoro/Obama, an Indonesian State citizen. See Constitution of Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 62 of 1958 concerning Immigration Affairs and Indonesian Civil Code (Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata) (KUHPer) (Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie).
Furthermore, under the Indonesian adoption law, once an Indonesian citizen adopts a child, the adoption severs the child’s relationship to the birth parents, and the adopted child is given the same status as a natural child and the child takes the name of his step-father, in this case, Soetoro. See Indonesian Constitution, Article 2.
The Indonesian citizenship law was designed to prevent apatride (stateless) or bipatride (dual) citizenship. Indonesian regulations recognized neither apatride nor bipatride (stateless or dual) citizenship. Since Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship; neither did the United States (since the United States only permitted dual citizenship when ‘both’ countries agree); and since Obama/Soetoro was a “natural” citizen of Indonesia, the United States would not step in or interfere with the laws of Indonesia. Hague Convention of 1930.
As a result of Soetoro/Obama’s Indonesian “natural” citizenship status, Soetoro/Obama could never regain U.S. “natural born” status, if he in fact he ever held such, which we doubt. Soetoro/Obama could have only become “naturalized” if the proper paperwork were filed with the U.S. State Department, after going through U.S. Immigration upon his return to the United States; in which case, Soetoro/Obama would have received a Certification of Citizenship indicating “naturalized.”
We are informed, believe and thereon allege Obama/Soetoro was never naturalized in the United States after his return. Soetoro/Obama was ten (10) years old when he returned to Hawaii to live with his grandparents. Soetoro/Obama’s mother did not return with him. Therefore, it appears that she did not apply for citizenship for Soetoro/Obama in the United States. If citizenship for Soetoro/Obama had been applied for in 1971, Soetoro/Obama would have a Certification of Citizenship. If Soetoro/Obama returned in 1971 to Hawaii without going through U.S. Immigration, today he would be an “illegal alien” – and obviously not able to serve as President, but also his term as a United States Senator from Illinois for nearly four (4) years was illegal. We further believe Soetoro might have reentered the United States at age ten (10) by showing a copy of his Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth, which he received when his birth was registered in Hawaii.
In addition, we have been unable to locate any legal documents wherein Soetoro’s name was legally changed from Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussein Obama. Soetoro/Obama’s silence on these issues is deafening and his refusal to release such records to prove that none of this occurred results in his status as Acting Commander in Chief at best, and a willful action on his part to deceive the American People and the Armed Forces of the United States so that he may wield power that is in non-compliance with the United States Constitution and the Holy Bible.
Served in Senate: 2003-
Mark Pryor
Senator, Democrat
Arkansas
Oh – but there’s more:
“The Indonesian Citizenship Myth” – Part 2
by Jacob5742 of AR, Tue 2/9
BadFiction states “The copy of Indonesian Law 62:1858 that I used is from the website of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). Full URL is:
http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,,,LEGISLATION,IDN,4562d8cf2,3ae6b4…
Thank you BadFiction for the Link, but I believe you meant, Law 62:1958 and not 1858.
Next, BadFiction talks about 8 U.S.C. §1435. BadFiction in their “The Indonesian Citizenship Myth – Part 1″ stated that the Nationality Act of 1940, Section 317(b), only pertained to loss of citizenship of a woman who marries a foreigner only pertained to marriages occurring before Sept. 22, 1922. I used 8 U.S.C. §1435(a)(2) to show BadFiction that a woman could still lose her U.S. citizenship as a result of marriage to an alien ineligible to U.S. citizenship. Just to reiterate, 8 U.S.C. §1435(a) states:
“a) Requirements:
Any person formerly a citizen of the United States who (1) prior
to September 22, 1922, lost United States citizenship by marriage
to an alien, or by the loss of United States citizenship of such
person’s spouse, or (2) on or after September 22, 1922, lost United
States citizenship by marriage to an alien ineligible to
citizenship, may if no other nationality was acquired by an
affirmative act of such person other than by marriage be
naturalized upon compliance with all requirements of this
subchapter, except -”In all fairness to BadFiction I did have 8 U.S.C. §1435(a)(2), the (2) was an accident, and I had meant to take that out.
But this aside, BadFiction claims that 8 U.S.C. 8 U.S.C. §1435(a) does not say what I claim it says. Regardless of the added (2), 8 U.S.C. §1435(a) in fact does say what I claimed in my response to his “The Indonesian Citizenship Myth – Part 1″ article, see above.
BadFiction next states “…neither Berg or any other birther have provided any evidence to support their claim that Stanley Ann Dunham ever gave up her US citizenship.” BadFiction then cites Law 62:1958. We disagree, despite this, it doesn’t matter what citizenship status Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro took on. The important issue here is Soetoro/Obama’s citizenship status. Not so fast, see 8 U.S.C. §1435(a). Was Lolo Soetoro eligible to become a U.S. “naturalized” citizen? BadFiction’s claim that Soetoro/Obama was born in the U.S. has been answered many times. What proof does BadFiction have? The image of the certification of live birth? Well Certification of Live Birth’s are given to children born abroad and registered by a parent also. Doesn’t Maya, who was born in Indonesia have a Certification of Live Birth? Regardless, where is Soetoro/Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth”? Certificate of Live Birth’s are given to children born in Hawaiian Hospitals. A Certification of Live Birth is different than a “Certificate of Live Birth”. Moreover, I.C.E. was investigating Hawaii for their flux of illegal immigrants. Certification of Live Births do not prove “natural born” U.S. citizenship status. See the Department of Homeland’s booklet, it states that a certification of Live birth is not even enough to prove Hawaiian heritage, but we are expected to accept it as “natural born” U.S. citizenship status?
Next is the argument regarding the Nationality Act of 1940 Revised 1952, Section 318. I used this section to show BadFiction contrary to his statements that a parent cannot expatriate a child’s citizenship status the Nationality Act says otherwise. Section 318 does nothing but talk about a child’s expatriation as a result of their parents actions. Now, lets straighten the rest of this out. Indonesia’s laws would govern, not the United States Laws.
As said time and time again by us, we believe that Soetoro/Obama was legally acknowledged and/or adopted by Lolo Soetoro. As stated in my previous post, which I have pasted below.
Soetoro/Obama was registered in a public school as an Indonesian citizen by the name of Barry Soetoro and his father was listed as Lolo Soetoro, M.A. Indonesia did not allow foreign students to attend their public schools in the late 1960’s or 1970’s, and any time a child was registered for a public school, the child’s name and citizenship status were verified through the Indonesian Government. See Constitution of Republic of Indonesia (Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945), Chapter 13, Law No. 62 of 1958 (all citizens of Indonesia have a right to education) – ** it does not say all children are entitled to an education, it specifies “all citizens” **. The Indonesian school record, indicates that Soetoro/Obama’s name is “Barry Soetoro;” his nationality is “Indonesia” and his father “Lolo Soetoro, M.A. There was no way for Soetoro/Obama to have attended school in Jakarta, Indonesia legally unless he was an Indonesian citizen, as Indonesia was under tight rule and was a Police State. See Constitution of Republic of Indonesia (Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945), Law No. 62 of 1958. These facts indicate that Obama/Soetoro is an Indonesian citizen, and therefore he is not eligible to be President of the United States.
Under Indonesian law, when a male acknowledges a child as his son, it deems the son, in this case Soetoro/Obama, an Indonesian State citizen. See Constitution of Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 62 of 1958 concerning Immigration Affairs and Indonesian Civil Code (Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata) (KUHPer) (Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie).
Furthermore, under the Indonesian adoption law, once an Indonesian citizen adopts a child, the adoption severs the child’s relationship to the birth parents, and the adopted child is given the same status as a natural child and the child takes the name of his step-father, in this case, Soetoro. See Indonesian Constitution, Article 2.
The Indonesian citizenship law was designed to prevent apatride (stateless) or bipatride (dual) citizenship. Indonesian regulations recognized neither apatride nor bipatride (stateless or dual) citizenship. Since Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship; neither did the United States (since the United States only permitted dual citizenship when ‘both’ countries agree); and since Obama/Soetoro was a “natural” citizen of Indonesia, the United States would not step in or interfere with the laws of Indonesia. Hague Convention of 1930.
At the time Barry Soetoro was in Indonesia, all Indonesian students were required to carry government identity cards or Karty Tanda Pendudaks, as well as family card identification called a Kartu Keluarga. The Kartu Keluarga is a family card which bears the legal names and citizenship status of all family members. See Asian Law Digests INDONESIA LAW DIGEST 9.02.
In addition, see the following Indonesian laws:
1 Asian Law Digests INDONESIA LAW DIGEST 4.02
4.02 CITIZENSHIP:
State citizens of Indonesia include: …(viii) children who are born outside of legal marriage from foreign state citizen mother who are acknowledged by father who is Indonesian State citizen as his children and that acknowledgment is made prior to children reaching 18 years of age or prior to marriage;
In event status of citizenship of Republic of Indonesia results in dual citizenship in relation to following categories of children, after age of 18 years or after aforementioned child has married, child must declare choice of one citizenship: …(iii) children who are born outside of legal marriage from foreign state citizen mother where child is acknowledged by father who is Indonesian State citizen as his child and that acknowledgment is conducted prior to child reaching 18 years of age or prior to marriage;…. (vi) Indonesian State citizen children who have not yet reached age of five years who are lawfully adopted by foreign state citizens based upon court decision.
Declaration of choice of citizenship is to be made in writing and delivered to official with attachment of documents which are stipulated by regulations of law.
1 Asian Law Digests INDONESIA LAW DIGEST 13.04
13.04 INFANTS
Citizenship Matters.
Children are deemed Indonesian citizens if they are born outside of legal marriage from foreign State citizen mother who is acknowledged by father who is Indonesian State citizen as his child and that acknowledgment is made prior to child reaching 18 years of age or prior to marriage. Children are deemed Indonesian citizens if they are born outside of legal marriage, have not yet reached age of 18 years, have not yet married and are legally acknowledged by father who has foreign citizenship.
BadFiction next states “There is no evidence to support the claim that Obama had at any time an Indonesian passport.”, well BadFiction, there certainly is not any evidence to support he didn’t nor is there any evidence to support he maintained a U.S. passport.
But, BadFiction next states “Stanley Ann Dunham left Lolo Soetoro in 1972 and came back to Hawaii for several years. She returned to Indonesia for her field work, and spent time in both locations. The Soetoro-Dunham divorce was on 20 August 1980. Since her field work in her degree was related to Indonesia, there’s no reason why she couldn’t be living as a US expat in Indonesia and have her legal US residence be in Hawaii.” This all sounds great with one exception. Maya was approx. 11 years old, a minor still in school full time, Maya would not be able to travel back and forth from Indonesian to Hawaii and vice versa. Plus, Stanley Ann would have been required to appear for Court in her divorce. Moreover, it was my understanding that Stanley Ann Dunham went back to Indonesia later in the 80’s to take care of Lolo Soetoro who had been diagnosed with cancer. Lolo Soetoro died in or about 1987.
Interesting enough, next BadFiction attempts to use the filings in the Strunk Case in D.C. He cites out what the U.S. DOJ states in their court filing. It is important to note, the document that BadFiction linked to is nothing more than “Affirmative Defenses” and “General Denials” which is common practice in all civil litigation. It means nothing at this stage of the Strunk litigation. In the case of Jablonski v. Ford Motor Co., Case# 03-L-2027, Madison County, MO. Ford Motor Company was sued, they too filed “Affirmative Defenses” and “General Denials”. The case went to trial and the jury returned a verdict for the Jablonski’s in the amount of $43 Million Dollars. Defendants in any type of case must answer a lawsuit, unless it is dismissed, when they answer, they deny all allegations, just as the DOJ did in the Strunk case and just like Ford Motor Company did in the Jablonski case.
BadFiction goes into great detail regarding adoptions, Lolo Soetoro’s religion or lack thereof, his claims that U.S. law prevails over the issues pertaining to Indonesia, not only is this rhetorical, but I have addressed most of this in my first response and again above.
The next move on BadFiction’s part is he covers what the Indonesian Constitution states regarding education. In fact BadFiction states:
“Constitution of Indonesia of 1945 first: (asnic.utexas.edu)
Chapter XIII. Education
Article 31″“1. Every citizen has the right to education.”
“2. The government shall establish and conduct a national educational system which shall be regulated by law.”
Thank you BadFiction, you point out what I had stated, the Indonesian constitution you posted says it all. Notice, it says every citizen. It does not say every child, it does not mention non citizens, etc.
It just gets better. BadFiction now states that the Indonesia school record is considered prima facia evidence. He then states it does not prove citizenship. I beg to differ BadFiction, what does the front of the document say? Yes, it says child’s name is Barry Soetoro; citizenship status: Indonesian; Father, Lolo Soetoro, M.A.
Now what exactly is prima facie evidence? Prima Facie evidence is a Latin legal term which means evidence that is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact or to establish the fact in question. prima facie is used in modern legal English to signify that on first examination, a matter appears to be self-evident from the facts. A prima-facie case is a lawsuit that alleges facts adequate to prove the underlying conduct supporting the cause of action and thereby prevail. After the Plaintiff has established a prima facie case, the burden of production shifts to the Defendant, in this case Soetoro/Obama. A plaintiff can also establish a prima facie case by “offering evidence adequate to create an inference”. Most legal proceedings require a prima facie case to exist, following which proceedings may then commence to test it, and create a ruling.
BadFiction is incorrect, the Indonesian School Record is prima facie evidence all right, but not just the fact Soetoro/Obama attended the Indonesia School, which Soetoro/Obama admits. It is also prima facia evidence of Soetoro/Obama’s name; citizenship status; and father’s name which indicates either a legal acknowledgment or adoption.
Next is the rhetoric about Hawaii, how Soetoro/Obama was born in Hawaii. BadFiction even states that the Indonesian School Record states that Soetoro/Obama was born in Hawaii and he is correct. However, Soetoro/Obama has a Certification of Live birth which was also furnished back in the early 1960’s to children born abroad whose births were registered in Hawaii, they then were issued a Certification of Live Birth. Moreover, if a child was born in a Hawaii hospital, they were issued a Certificate of Live Birth. Why doesn’t Soetoro/Obama have a Certificate of Live Birth? We have been provided copies of other individuals Certificate of Live Birth’s that were born around the same time as Soetoro/Obama. A Certification of Live Birth and a Certificate of Live Birth are two (2) completely different documents.
Regardless of where Soetoro/Obama was born, the Indonesian issues is what is prominent. Once Soetoro/Obama became Barry Soetoro, an Indonesian state citizen, the birth place is completely moot. This is not conjecture, BadFiction said it himself, the Indonesian School Record is prima facie evidence.BadFiction states a minor could not have been removed from the Country without a U.S. passport. Not true BadFiction. You are not checked for a passport leaving the country. Further, back in the early 1960’s there were family passports. At age 2, Soetoro/Obama would have been traveling on his mother’s passport.
BadFiction states, and I must quote:
“Article 3. (1)A child outside a marriage of a mother who is a citizen of the Republic of Indonesia or a child out of a legal marriage, but who has in a case of divorce been assigned to the care of its mother, a citizen of the Republic of Indonesia, who follows the nationality of the father, a foreigner, may present a petition to the Minister of Justice in order to acquire the citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia, if, after, having acquired the citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia, it possesses no other nationality or states at the same time to have released another nationality according to the procedure stipulated by the legal provisions of the country of origin. and/or according to the procedure stipulated by the agreement on the settlement of the bi-nationality between the Republic of Indonesia and the country in question”
Article 3 does not pertain to Soetoro/Obama. Soetoro/Obama’s mother was not a citizen of Indonesia at the time of her marriage to Lolo Soetoro or at the time of the birth of Soetoro/Obama. Lolo Soetoro is not the foreign parent. Lolo Soetoro was an Indonesian citizen who legally acknowledged and or adopted Soetoro/Obama. The child follows the citizenship status of the father, in this case Lolo Soetoro.
As I continue reading through BadFiction’s post, he addresses the adoption issue and states that Indonesia is 86.1% Muslim and therefore under Islamic law Soetoro/Obama would not take the name Soetoro if adopted. BadFiction then sites the Qu’ran. Not so BadFiction.
Nowhere can I find in the Indonesian laws anything about a child not taking the Indonesian adoptive father’s last name. See 1 Asian Law Digests Indonesia Law Digest13.01; Martindale-Hubbell(R) Law Digest – Asian Law Digests; 1 Indonesia Law Digest; Section 13 Family.
BadFiction asks “And do you have a copy of this Kartu Keluarga by any chance?? If not, you can’t infer anything on it.” Ummmm, BadFiction, it was and is the law in Indonesia, all families had to see Asian Law Digests INDONESIA LAW DIGEST 9.02. Indonesian citizens are required to complete civil registration, implementation of which includes completing formalities for and obtaining family identity cards and recordation concerning every change which arises.
BadFiction states “Customs officials don’t look at birth certificates, they look at passports. In addition, the US State Department accepts the Hawaiian COLB as Prima Facie evidence of US birth and citizenship. Even if he lost his US passport in Indonesia, his mother could have provided the info for the US Embassy in that country to provide him a new one.” My fault BadFiction, what the statement was supposed to say was we believe Soetoro/Obama returned from Indonesia as Barry Soetoro, however, was enrolled in his private school as Barack H. Obama and his Certification of Live Birth was used for identification purposes. Sorry BadFiction, my bad. LOL!
BadFiction claims, according to an article which does not specify any dates, “The regime sided with the assimilationist perspective of the LPKB, instead of the integrationist approach that Baperki had propounded. Chinese Indonesians who had joined the anti-communist movement and who were close to the regime viewed assimilation as the best option. The New Order regime consequently adopted policies to eliminate the distinctions marking Chinese Indonesians from other Indonesian citizens. It banned alien schools and urged all Chinese (citizens and non-citizens) to attend Indonesian national schools.” – Page 65 The date of this statement is very important why? See below:
Assimilation into the New Order (1965–1998)
In the 1960s, many government regulations, such as PP 10/1959, restricted Chinese Indonesians from the rural areas and forced many to relocate to big cities.
President Suharto became a strong advocate for Chinese assimilation rather than integration. As part of 1967’s ‘Basic Policy for the Solution of the Chinese Problem’ and other measures, all but one Chinese-language papers were closed, all Chinese religious expressions had to be confined to their homes, Chinese-language schools were phased out, Chinese script in public places was banned, and Chinese were encouraged to take on Indonesian-sounding names, Schwarz, A. (1994). A Nation in Waiting: Indonesia in the 1990s. Westview Press. p. 106. ISBN 1-86373-635-2. Most of this legislation were revoked following Suharto’s resignation in 1998.
Political pressures in the 1970s and 1980s restricted the role of the Chinese Indonesian in politics, academics, and the military. As a result, they were thereafter constrained professionally to becoming entrepreneurs and professional managers in trade, manufacturing, and banking. In the 1970s, following the failed alleged Communist coup attempt in 1965, there was a strong sentiment against the Chinese Indonesians, who were accused of being Communist collaborators.
See McGregor, Katharine E., History in Uniform. Military Ideology and the Construction of Indonesia’s Past, Leiden 2007; Hadiz, Vedi R., The Left and Indonesia’s 1960s: the politics of remembering and forgetting.
One last note BadFiction, the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia you linked to is dated Republic of Indonesia 1989 and states in the first paragraph “The translation of the current publication of “The 1945 Constitution” is a provisional revision to that of the previous editions which were based on the translation of its first edition published by the then Yogyakarta-based Information Ministry of the Republic of Indonesia in 1950″
You did a great job BadFiction trying to discredit the Indonesian issues.
AND MORE ———————————————-
“The Indonesian Citizenship Myth” – Part 3
by Jacob5742 of AR, Tue 2/9
In response to BadFiction’s “The Indonesian Citizenship Myth – Part 3, BadFiction makes the following statements, which I again, I completely disagree with. So, I will again respond accordingly.
BadFiction states “In either case, anything that affected Stanley Ann Dunham’s citizenship after Barack Obama was born would not change Barack Obama’s citizenship.”
Not so, as I have disputed in Part 1 and Part 2, I will again dispute here as well. Section 318 of the Nationality Act of 1940 revised 1952 does nothing but talk about a child’s expatriation as a result of their parents actions.
As said time and time again by us, we believe that Soetoro/Obama was legally acknowledged and/or adopted by Lolo Soetoro. As stated in my previous post, which I have pasted below.
Under Indonesian law, when a male acknowledges a child as his son, it deems the son, in this case Soetoro/Obama, an Indonesian State citizen. See Constitution of Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 62 of 1958 concerning Immigration Affairs and Indonesian Civil Code (Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata) (KUHPer) (Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie).
The Indonesian citizenship law was designed to prevent apatride (stateless) or bipatride (dual) citizenship. Indonesian regulations recognized neither apatride nor bipatride (stateless or dual) citizenship. Since Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship; neither did the United States (since the United States only permitted dual citizenship when ‘both’ countries agree); and since Obama/Soetoro was a “natural” citizen of Indonesia, the United States would not step in or interfere with the laws of Indonesia. Hague Convention of 1930.
Moreover, the Indonesian School Record shows the name of the child as “Barry Soetoro”; Citizenship: Indonesia; and Parent: Lolo Soetoro, M.A. The Soetoro Divorce shows the parties of the marriage having two (2) children, one under the age of eighteen (18) and one over the age of eighteen (18) (Soetoro/Obama) who was a full time student. See divorce papers below. In divorces, you do not name a child as the child of the parents, like in the Soetoro Divorce, unless the child is legally the child of the divorcing parents. In otherwords, if Lolo Soetoro was only a step-parent with no legal ties to Soetoro/Obama, then Soetoro/Obama would have never been named in the Soetoro Divorce.
Article 4 of The Hague Convention on Certain Questions Relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws, 1930 says “a state may not afford diplomatic protection to one of its nationals against a state whose nationality such person also posses”. What this means is Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship and therefore neither did the United States. Under Indonesia law, once Soetoro/Obama became an Indonesian State Citizen by virtue of adoption and/or legal acknowledgment by Lolo Soetoro, he (Soetoro/Obama) could not lose that status without relinquishing his citizenship in writing, under oath. If he did that, the government of Indonesia would have those records. If he did not do so by age 21, Obama is to this day still considered an Indonesian citizen by that country. His place of birth or the nationality of his mother is irrelevant; Indonesian law takes precedence under The Master Nationality Rule of Article 4 of the Hague Convention on 1930.
Next, BadFiction states “2) Records in the Honolulu newspapers at the time announcing the birth” However, what is left out here is private investigators went out to the resident in the newspaper announcements, only to learn that Barack Obama, Sr.; Stanley Ann Dunhum; nor infant Soetoro/Obama ever resided at the address. In addition, anyone can call in a birth announcement, anyone. No one has been able to verify exactly who it was that called in the birth Announcements of Soetoro/Obama.
BadFiction again addresses the Indonesian School record, In fact, BadFiction says “3) The Indonesian School Record that the birthers cite as proof of Indonesian Citizenship, Adoption, and Religion, ALSO gives a birthplace of Honolulu, Hawaii. If they accept that document as Prima Facie evidence in other matters, then logically they should also accept it for birthplace as well”
However, I have stated many times, once Soetoro/Obama acquired his Indonesian citizenship it did not matter where he was born. However, I would like to further my statement. As said many times, we believe and it appears that Soetoro/Obama was in fact born in Kenya and his birth was registered by a family member in Hawaii, thus he obtained a “Certification of Live Birth”. So it would seem that was the reason, Soetoro/Obama’s birth was listed as “Hawaii” on the Indonesian School Record. In addition, Stanley Ann Dunham may have told Lolo Soetoro that Soetoro/Obama was born in Hawaii, the birth place of the child was not checked by the Indonesian Government, only the name and citizenship status to ensure the child’s name matched that of his father, and his citizenship status was Indonesian. Again, Lolo Soetoro, M.A. was listed as the parent of Barry Soetoro on the Indonesian School Record.
Now, BadFiction raises the issue of the interview with Sarah Obama, Soetoro/Obama’s grandmother. We received the tape of the conversation and the translation of the Interview with the phone records from Bishop Ron McRae, as well as Affidavits from Bishop Ron McRae and as noted in the affidavits Brother Kweli Shuhudia, who conducted the actual interview. There is no reason Bishop Ron McRae would not tell the truth and we have not been given any reason to doubt him I understand BadFiction obtained the audio and transcript from other locations, however, I am disturbed at the fact that the link is NOT of the transcript provided to us and we have NO idea who the person is that transcribed the one on the scribed link nor what audio was used for the transcription. This is concerning because it is not honest for anyone to state that this “supposed” translation on scribed is of the actual audio of the telephone interview. The scribed link referred to by BadFiction is based on speculative statements of the supposed “translator” used in the document and again we do not know what audio was used. The audio says otherwise. The person this scribed linked document has as “Ogombe” is actually another grandson of Sarah Obama, of course this was left out. In the audio after Sarah Obama said yes that Soetoro/Obama was born in Kenya and she was present for the birth, there is scuffling in the tape and you can NOT hear what is being said, nor can you understand it. Next, Sarah Obama’s grandson who is helping with the interview translation states “no no no Obama born in America” there is other statements made by this grandson that are very difficult to hear. It was NOT Sarah Obama making those statements and the “shock” was due to the fact that Sarah Obama told Bishop Ron McRae of Soetoro/Obama’s real birth place in Kenya. That is why Bishop Ron McRae stated when he went out to Kenya in December he wanted to meet with Sarah Obama and see the birth place of Soetoro/Obama. You may also recall, after this interview, police were stationed at Sarah Obama’s house and no one was allowed to interview her.
BadFiction next assumes when I mention the registration of birth in Hawaii that I am talking about Hawaii Statute §338-17.8. BadFiction is correct in what that statute states, he is in wrong in his assumptions. §338-17.8 is a 1982 Revision and does not apply to Soetoro/Obama’s registration. The law that applied at the time of Soetoro/Obama’s registration of Birth in Hawaii is the 1955 Laws, Chapter 57 “Vital Statistics”, Section §57-8 Compulsory registration of births; §57-9 Local registrar to prepare birth certificate. These sections are outlined below.
“§ 57-8 Compulsory registration of births”
“Within the time prescribed by the board, a certificate of every birth shall be filed with the local registrar of the district in which the birth occurred, by the physician, midwife or other legally authorized person in attendance at the birth; or if not so attended, by one of the parents. [R.L. 1945, s. 3100.09; add. L. 1949, c. 327, s.9.]
And
“§57-9 Local registrar to prepare birth certificate.”
“(a) If neither parent of the newborn child whose birth is unattended as above provided is able to prepare a birth certificate, the local registrar shall secure the necessary information from any person having knowledge of the birth and prepare and file the certificate.”
“(b) The board shall prescribe the time within which a supplementary report furnishing information omitted on the original certificate may be returned for the purpose of completing the certificate. Certificates of birth completed by a supplementary report shall not be considered as “delayed” or “altered.” [R.L. 1945, s. 3100.10; add. L. 1949, c. 327, s. 10.]
I have asked our webmaster to post the above laws. As you can see from the laws that apply to Soetoro/Obama’s registration of birth; if the birth was not attended by a Physician or Midwife, the parents or anyone having knowledge of the birth, are who fills out the birth certificate or supplies the information to the registrar who in turn fills out the birth certificate. This means a child could have been born anywhere, and the parent only has to claim the child was born in Hawaii. In addition pursuant to §57-18 a person’s birth can be registered up to a year after the actual birth. See also Part II. Certificates of Hawaiian Birth, §57-40 Issuance; procedure.
A poster on the blog who goes by the name “Greg” also stated that Soetoro/Obama’s name was never changed because Hawaii never recognized it, that Hawaii was aware that they lost a citizen (Soetoro/Obama) in 1967 however that citizen returned in 1971 (I’m not quoting him word for word, just summarizing his statement). However, my rebuttal was how would Hawaii have known Soetoro/Obama left and how would Hawaii know when that child returned, if he returned. In addition, others stated that if Soetoro/Obama was in fact legally acknowledged and/or adopted Hawaii would have been aware of it. I disagreed with them and said not necessarily. Pursuant to the 1955 statutes, Chapter 57, §57-23 Adoptions, it sates:
“§57-23 Adoptions”
“(a) In case of the adoption of any person born int he Territory, the bureau of public health statistics, upon receipt of a properly certified copy of the adoption decree, or certified abstract thereof on a form approved by the board, shall prepare a supplemental certificate in the name of the adopted person…”
As you can see, if the legal acknowledgment or adoption which took place in Indonesia was never submitted to Hawaii, Hawaii would never know about it.
Now, BadFiction next states that Hawaiian statute §338-20.5 mandates that the true or probable country of birth must be stated and shall be known as the place of birth and the date of birth. BadFiction then states that §338-20.5 is statute enacted in 1982. Note to the readers, §338-20.5 was enacted 21 years after Soetoro/Obama’s birth. BadFiction then states “The new certificate of birth shall show the true or probable foreign country of birth and then says this law was passed in 1979, amended in 1990. Yes BadFiction, it is a 1979 statute amended in 1990 and a 1982 statute, not applicable to Soetoro/Obama’s birth or registration which took place in 1961. I do not see in the statute anywhere that it is retroactive, thus it is inapplicable to Soetoro/Obama. The Hawaiian statutes of 1955 are what is applicable to Soetoro/Obama.
BadFiction then states “So there is no evidence that the State of Hawaii would issue certificates to people born out of state before HRS §338-17.8 was passed.” Yes there is BadFiction, see the 1955 Hawaiian Laws above.
Next is the issue of Maya’s birth being registered in the State of Hawaii and a Certification of Live Birth being issued by Hawaii. Just like Soetoro/Obama, if this is the case the Hawaiian Laws of 1955 would apply as Maya Soetoro was born in 1970, so all the parent has to do is state the child was born in Hawaii. But, BadFiction claims this came from “techdude”. Not so BadFiction. See “The Obama File” at http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaFamily.htm. It states”
“Obama’s half-sister, Maya Kassandra Soetoro, was born on August 15, 1970, in Jakarta, Indonesia. Anna registered her birth as “born in Honolulu” shortly after her birth, as well. Maya would have a State of Hawaii Certification of Live Birth (COLB), just like the one Obama posted on the Internet.”
“Maya would also attend the private Punahou School.”
“It was Maya, who has said that Obama was legally adopted by her father, Lolo Soetoro, and Maya also said, ‘There was always a joke between my mom and Barack that he would be the first black president.’”
The Obama File at http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaFamily.htm also states:
“Obama arrived in Indonesia at about the age of five according to most accounts, although it was possible he arrived at the age of six, according to a few sources. If Lolo Soetoro adopted Obama at age five or younger, then Obama would automatically have become an Indonesian citizen according to the country’s laws in the 1960’s, which stipulated any child aged five or younger adopted by an Indonesian father is immediately granted Indonesian citizenship upon completion of the adoption process.”
“According to Indonesian legal experts, only Indonesian citizens could attend state-operated public schools.”
And
“‘The Indonesian Citizenship Law states that children’s citizenship is derived solely from the citizenship of the father. Children of citizen mothers and foreign fathers are considered foreigners and require visas to remain in the country until the age of 18, at which time they may apply for citizenship. They are prohibited from attending public schools and must attend private, international schools, which usually are more expensive.’” and credits this information to the U.S. State Department.
You can also find this information in The Obama Timeline by Don Fredrick located at http://www.colony14.net/id41.html or in his book sold at Amazon and located at http://www.amazon.com/Obama-Timeline-Birth-Through-Office/dp/1440150737/…
Lets see what else BadFiction has to say. BadFiction next goes into the Department of Home Lands (DHHL). I raised this issue and we filed the information supplied by the DHHL in the Hollister case early 2009. A copy of the DHHL book we used when citing the information in the Hollister is located on our website at http://obamacrimes.com/?p=419 “Obama Crimes responds to BadFiction – Part 2a. The only reason we raised this issue was because DHHL stated in the booklet:
“In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.” [emphasis added]
“When requesting a certified copy of your birth certificate from the Vital Records Section of DOH, let the clerk know you are requesting it “For DHHL Purposes,” and that you need a copy of the original Certificate of Live Birth and not the computer-generated Certification. If mailing in your request form, please fill in “For DHHL Purposes” in the “Reason for Requesting a Certified Copy” section. (See example on page 6.)” [emphasis added]
BadFiction is attempting to argue that the DHHL only pertains to heritage. My point is and was if the Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth is not sufficient to prove Hawaiian Heritage, then why should “we the people” accept an image of a Certification of Live Birth as constitutional eligibility to serve as United States President? We should not. However, BadFiction goes on and on about the DHHL and other statutes enacted in 1982, missing the entire point of our arguments. It should be noted, after we filed the references to the DHHL booklet in the Hollister Case, Hawaii rushed and amended its requirements to buy lands in Hawaii on or about June 2009.
BadFiction then states “Hague Convention of 1930, Article 1 “It is for each State to determine under its own law who are its nationals” Therefore, US law would be used to determine US citizenship.” Wrong again, Soetoro/Obama lost all U.S. citizenship status when he became a citizen of Indonesia, thus Indonesia Law takes precedence under The Master Nationality Rule of Article 4 of the Hague Convention of 1930, see above also.
BadFiction for the third times states “Second off, Chapter 13 states that all citizens have a right to an education. It doesn’t say anywhere that non-citizens are prohibited from one.” So BadFiction, for the third time I too will reiterate the Indonesian Constitution which you are using was revised in 1989, so it is not the genuine Indonesian Constitution of 1945, next as you point out the Indonesian Constitution states ALL CITIZENS, It does not say every child, it does not mention non citizens, etc.
Next, BadFiction cites “the book (jstor.org) “New Indonesian Marriage Law: A Mirror of Indonesia’s Political, Cultural, and Legal Systems,” by June and Ronald Katz” and BadFiction states Islamic law rules. WRONG. BadFiction then uses laws revised in 1974, which I do not see where these laws are retroactive and thus do not apply to Soetoro/Obama. However, the unfortunate part is what BadFiction has posted as their response confuses the readers. Nice attempt BadFiction.
BadFiction again goes into Indonesian Law versus U.S. Law. BadFiction states “Nor could Indonesia step in or interfere with the laws of the United States, since Obama was a natural-born citizen of the United States under US law. Again, the Hague Convention of 1930 also states that “It is for each State to determine under its own law who are its nationals.” and “Any question as to whether a person possesses the nationality of a particular State shall be determined in accordance with the law of that State”. However, BadFiction is missing the point, missing the facts and confusing the laws. In fact, BadFiction has it all backwards. As I stated above:
“Article 4 of The Hague Convention on Certain Questions Relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws, 1930 says “a state may not afford diplomatic protection to one of its nationals against a state whose nationality such person also posses”. What this means is Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship and therefore neither did the United States. Under Indonesia law, once Soetoro/Obama became an Indonesian State Citizen by virtue of adoption and/or legal acknowledgment by Lolo Soetoro, he (Soetoro/Obama) could not lose that status without relinquishing his citizenship in writing, under oath. If he did that, the government of Indonesia would have those records. If he did not do so by age 21, Obama is to this day still considered an Indonesian citizen by that country. His place of birth or the nationality of his mother is irrelevant; Indonesian law takes precedence under The Master Nationality Rule of Article 4 of the Hague Convention of 1930.”
BadFiction also raises the issues regarding a legal “acknowledgment” which we claim was signed by Lolo Soetoro acknowledging Soetoro/Obama as his birth son or adopted Soetoro/Obama. BadFiction seems to think that only biological father’s acknowledge their children and then cites the Asian law digests that talk about the Indonesian laws pertaining to a legal acknowledgment signed by an Indonesian citizen father and a foreign mother, in this case regarding the legal acknowledgment, the foreign mother would be Stanley Ann. In fact BadFiction goes on to state “Barack Obama, Sr. and Stanley Ann Dunham were married. Therefore, this would not apply. The context seems to be talking about the biological father acknowledging paternity anyway, not a stepfather.” The fact that Obama, Sr. and Stanley Ann were at one time married doesn’t matter. We are unsure whether Soetoro/Obama was actually adopted or if a legal acknowledgment was signed. If Lolo Soetoro signed a legal acknowledgment then he is telling the Indonesian Government that he is the biological father of Soetoro/Obama, so BadFiction’s arguments fail. A lot of men who are not the biological father of children have signed legal acknowledgment forms claiming the child as their biological child. Regardless, the Indonesian laws regarding an Indonesian Citizen male acknowledging a child pertains to Lolo Soetoro if Lolo Soetoro legally acknowledged Soetoro/Obama instead of adopting him.
In my last response (The Indonesian Citizenship Myth – Part 2), I stated “Interesting enough, next BadFiction attempts to use the filings in the Strunk Case in D.C. He cites out what the U.S. DOJ states in their court filing. It is important to note, the document that BadFiction linked to is nothing more than “Affirmative Defenses” and “General Denials” which is common practice in all civil litigation.”
BadFiction’s response to me on this part three is “True. However, I will point out that under that practice, the agency in question has to affirm if they hold the information in question in their records. To cite Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, III (Pleadings and Motions), Rule 11: (cornell.edu)”
I must point out, in the Strunk Case where he references the Governments Answer of the lawsuit on behalf of Soetoro/Obama, the Government does NOT say they affirm that they hold any documents. BadFiction points out regarding the above rule that the agency would be required to do so, but again, they have not. Also, please note, several posters who disagree with us continue to say that with the Strunk case, the United States State Department admits in their filing that Soetoro/Obama is in fact a U.S. Citizen. This is NOT true, the State Department has never said any such thing and they certainly have NOT filed anything in any of the court cases. BadFiction then goes into the Federal Rule regarding the requirements of affirmative defenses and answers. The attorney who prepares the general denials and the affirmative defenses can do so based on what they have been told by their client. Unfortunately, clients don’t always tell the truth.
BadFiction again brings up the Indonesian school record, claiming it does not prove anything except what was provided to the Indonesian public school. Not so BadFiction, your statement is completely wrong.
Soetoro/Obama was registered in a public school as an Indonesian citizen by the name of Barry Soetoro and his father was listed as Lolo Soetoro, M.A. Indonesia did not allow foreign students to attend their public schools in the late 1960’s or 1970’s, and any time a child was registered for a public school, the child’s name and citizenship status were verified through the Indonesian Government. See Constitution of Republic of Indonesia (Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945), Chapter 13, Law No. 62 of 1958 (all citizens of Indonesia have a right to education) – ** it does not say all children are entitled to an education, it specifies “all citizens” **. The Indonesian school record, indicates that Soetoro/Obama’s name is “Barry Soetoro;” his nationality is “Indonesia” and his father “Lolo Soetoro, M.A. There was no way for Soetoro/Obama to have attended school in Jakarta, Indonesia legally unless he was an Indonesian citizen, as Indonesia was under tight rule and was a Police State. See Constitution of Republic of Indonesia (Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945), Law No. 62 of 1958. These facts indicate that Obama/Soetoro is an Indonesian citizen, and therefore he is not eligible to be President of the United States.
BadFiction then says that I should not read things into what he is saying. I can only take what you say BadFiction at face value. Below I posted what I stated in our response to BadFiction in the Indonesian Citizenship Myth – Part 2
My response:
“It just gets better. BadFiction now states that the Indonesia school record is considered prima facie evidence. He then states it does not prove citizenship. I beg to differ BadFiction, what does the front of the document say? Yes, it says child’s name is Barry Soetoro; citizenship status: Indonesian; Father, Lolo Soetoro, M.A.
Now what exactly is prima facie evidence? Prima Facie evidence is a Latin legal term which means Evidence that is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact or to establish the fact in question. prima facie is used in modern legal English to signify that on first examination, a matter appears to be self-evident from the facts. A prima-facie case is a lawsuit that alleges facts adequate to prove the underlying conduct supporting the cause of action and thereby prevail. After the Plaintiff has established a prima facie case, the burden of production shifts to the Defendant, in this case Soetoro/Obama. A plaintiff can also establish a prima facie case by “offering evidence adequate to create an inference”. Most legal proceedings require a prima facie case to exist, following which proceedings may then commence to test it, and create a ruling.
BadFiction is incorrect, the Indonesian School Record is prima facie evidence all right, but not just the fact Soetoro/Obama attended the Indonesia School, which Soetoro/Obama admits. It is also prima facia evidence of Soetoro/Obama’s name; citizenship status; and father’s name which indicates either a legal acknowledgment or adoption.” End of my response to BadFiction in “The Indonesian Citizenship Myth – Part 2.
You see BadFiction, you stated that the Indonesian School Record on its face is prima facie evidence. I responded accordingly stating that if the document itself is prima facie evidence, everything on that document is prima facie evidence and I stand by it. If that is not what you meant, then that is a different story.
BadFiction goes on to say “I do understand why “paralegal” – and Berg – are so strongly defending their theory on this. Much of their claims – even down to the “Soetoro” name – are based on the Indonesian citizenship claim. Not only their claims, but those birthers who have borrowed/stolen Berg’s arguments (such as Dr. Orly Taitz, and Stephen Pidgeon, since much of their original cases are word-for-word copies of Berg’s claims)” My response to BadFiction is Thank you.
In all fairness to BadFiction, reading of the Laws is interpretation. When you work in law, you understand and you look to see how the Court’s previously interpreted the laws you are questioning. This is why we also have Appellate Courts and the United States Supreme Courts. It gets even more difficult when you are dealing with other Countries laws as well. But BadFiction, we worked with an Indonesian Law Firm to assist us with the Indonesian Laws. In addition, we do not speak the language in Indonesia, so we had to rely on the Indonesian Law Firm to translate the Laws into English to ensure we understood them.
I too appreciate BadFiction’s courtesy in our debate over the issues. However, contrary to what BadFiction believes, we have proven our case!
http://www.numbersusa.com/content/node/5252
http://static.politifact.com.s3.amazonaws.com/graphics/birthCertObama.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Two_of_the_United_States_Constitution
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_citizenship_conspiracy_theories
Posted by txlady706 
